Ankur Desai

Prof. Ankur Desai

University of Wisconsin-Madison
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 July 2020 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGilberto Pastorello
Gilberto Pastorello
CTCarlo Trotta
Carlo Trotta
ECEleonora Canfora
Eleonora Canfora
HCHousen Chu
Housen Chu
DCDanielle Christianson
Danielle Christianson
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
The FLUXNET2015 dataset provides ecosystem-scale data on CO2, water, and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere, and other meteorological and biological measurements, from 212 sites around the globe (over 1500 site-years, up to and including year 2014). These sites, independently managed and operated, voluntarily contributed their data to create global datasets. Data were quality controlled and processed using uniform methods, to improve consistency and intercomparability across sites. The dataset is already being used in a number of applications, including ecophysiology studies, remote sensing studies, and development of ecosystem and Earth system models. FLUXNET2015 includes derived-data products, such as gap-filled time series, ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic uptake estimates, estimation of uncertainties, and metadata about the measurements, presented for the first time in this paper. In addition, 206 of these sites are for the first time distributed under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license. This paper details this enhanced dataset and the processing methods, now made available as open-source codes, making the dataset more accessible, transparent, and reproducible.

1 December 2007 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAntje M. Moffat
Antje M. Moffat
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
DHDavid Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger
ARAndrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson
VSVanessa J. Stauch
Vanessa J. Stauch

27 September 2011 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAndrew Richardson
Andrew Richardson
RARyan S. Anderson
Ryan S. Anderson
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain
ABAlan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr
GBGil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer
YXYongkang Xue
Yongkang Xue

1 July 2010 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WYWenping Yuan
Wenping Yuan
SLShuguang Liu
Shuguang Liu
GYGuirui Yu
Guirui Yu
JBJean-Marc Bonnefond
Jean-Marc Bonnefond
JCJiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen
SVShashi B. Verma
Shashi B. Verma

26 June 2006 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHF.A. Heinsch
F.A. Heinsch
MZMaosheng Zhao
Maosheng Zhao
SRS.W. Running
S.W. Running
JKJ.S. Kimball
J.S. Kimball
RNR.R. Nemani
R.R. Nemani
LFL.B. Flanagan
L.B. Flanagan
The Moderate Resolution Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor has provided near real-time estimates of gross primary production (GPP) since March 2000. We compare four years (2000 to 2003) of satellite-based calculations of GPP with tower eddy CO2 flux-based estimates across diverse land cover types and climate regimes. We examine the potential error contributions from meteorology, leaf area index (LAI)/fPAR, and land cover. The error between annual GPP computed from NASA's Data Assimilation Office's (DAO) and tower-based meteorology is 28%, indicating that NASA's DAO global meteorology plays an important role in the accuracy of the GPP algorithm. Approximately 62% of MOD15-based estimates of LAI were within the estimates based on field optical measurements, although remaining values overestimated site values. Land cover presented the fewest errors, with most errors within the forest classes, reducing potential error. Tower-based and MODIS estimates of annual GPP compare favorably for most biomes, although MODIS GPP overestimates tower-based calculations by 20%-30%. Seasonally, summer estimates of MODIS GPP are closest to tower data, and spring estimates are the worst, most likely the result of the relatively rapid onset of leaf-out. The results of this study indicate, however, that the current MODIS GPP algorithm shows reasonable spatial patterns and temporal variability across a diverse range of biomes and climate regimes. So, while continued efforts are needed to isolate particular problems in specific biomes, we are optimistic about the general quality of these data, and continuation of the MOD17 GPP product will likely provide a key component of global terrestrial ecosystem analysis, providing continuous weekly measurements of global vegetation production

20 April 2020 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Joshua FisherJoshua Fisher
Joshua Fisher
BLBrian Lee
Brian Lee
APAdam J. Purdy
Adam J. Purdy
GHGregory Halverson
Gregory Halverson
MDMatthew B. Dohlen
Matthew B. Dohlen
SHSimon Hook
Simon Hook
The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) was launched to the International Space Station on 29 June 2018 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The primary science focus of ECOSTRESS is centered on evapotranspiration (ET), which is produced as Level‐3 (L3) latent heat flux (LE) data products. These data are generated from the Level‐2 land surface temperature and emissivity product (L2_LSTE), in conjunction with ancillary surface and atmospheric data. Here, we provide the first validation (Stage 1, preliminary) of the global ECOSTRESS clear‐sky ET product (L3_ET_PT‐JPL, Version 6.0) against LE measurements at 82 eddy covariance sites around the world. Overall, the ECOSTRESS ET product performs well against the site measurements (clear‐sky instantaneous/time of overpass: r2 = 0.88; overall bias = 8%; normalized root‐mean‐square error, RMSE = 6%). ET uncertainty was generally consistent across climate zones, biome types, and times of day (ECOSTRESS samples the diurnal cycle), though temperate sites are overrepresented. The 70‐m‐high spatial resolution of ECOSTRESS improved correlations by 85%, and RMSE by 62%, relative to 1‐km pixels. This paper serves as a reference for the ECOSTRESS L3 ET accuracy and Stage 1 validation status for subsequent science that follows using these data.