Anna Andreeva

Dr. Anna Andreeva

Department of Logopedics, South-West University "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2023 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Galya Georgieva-TsanevaGalya Georgieva-Tsaneva
Galya Georgieva-Tsaneva
Anna AndreevaAnna Andreeva
Anna Andreeva
PTPaulina Tsvetkova
Paulina Tsvetkova
ALAnna Lekova
Anna Lekova
MSMiglena Simonska
Miglena Simonska
IKIva Kostadinova
Iva Kostadinova
The use of innovative technology in the field of Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) has gained significant attention nowadays. Despite being a promising research area, Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) have not been thoroughly studied and used in SLT. This paper makes two main contributions: firstly, providing a comprehensive review of existing research on the use of SARs to enhance communication skills in children and adolescents. Secondly, organizing the information into tables that categorize the interactive play scenarios described in the surveyed papers. The inclusion criteria for play scenarios in the tables are based only on their effectiveness for SLT proven by experimental findings. The data, systematically presented in a table format, allow readers to easily find relevant information based on various factors, such as disorder type, age, treatment technique, robot type, etc. The study concludes that the despite limited research on the use of social robots for children and adolescents with communication disorders (CD), promising outcomes have been reported. The authors discuss the methodological, technical, and ethical limitations related to the use of SARs for SLT in clinical or home environments, as well as the huge potential of conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a secondary assistive technology to facilitate speech and language interventions.

22 June 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PPPanayiota Polycarpou
Panayiota Polycarpou
Anna AndreevaAnna Andreeva
Anna Andreeva
Andri IoannouAndri Ioannou
Andri Ioannou
PZPanayiotis Zaphiris
Panayiotis Zaphiris

29 May 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Anna AndreevaAnna Andreeva
Anna Andreeva
ALAnna Lekova
Anna Lekova
MSMiglena Simonska
Miglena Simonska
TTTanio Tanev
Tanio Tanev

30 June 2020 in Специална педагогика и логопедия
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anna AndreevaAnna Andreeva
Anna Andreeva
Andri IoannouAndri Ioannou
Andri Ioannou
Robots become very popular in research on learning, education and rehabilitation especially for children with disabilities. Our paper presents a study of a robot-assisted speech and language therapy session with eleven hearing-impaired children who use cochlear implant(s). The study explores the opportunity of using a humanoid robot for the development of speech, language and listening skills. NAO cannot articulate, therefore, children cannot do lip-reading. We considered that this special characteristic of the robot would provoke the participating children to use actively their listening. Results showed how NAO assisted speech and language therapy sessions with hearing-impaired children who use two different communication modalities – total communication and auditory-oral. References: Arendsen, J., Janssen, J. B., Begeer, S.& Stekelenburg F. C. (2010). The use of robots in social behavior tutoring for children with ASD. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 371-372). New York: ACM. Bacciu, A., Pasanisi, E., Vincenti, V., Ormitti, F., Di Lella, F., Guida, M., Berghenty, M. & Bacciu, S. (2009). Cochlear implantation in children with cerebral palsy. A preliminary report. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 73 (5), 717-721. Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., De Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., Neerincx, M., Baroni, I. & Zelati, M. C. (2013). Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. In: International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 452-459). Cham: Springer. Cifuentes, C.A., Pinto, M.J., Céspedes, N.& Munera, M. (2020). Social Robots in Therapy and Care. Current Robotics Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00009-2. Cooper, H., & Craddock, L. (2006). Cochlear implants: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons. Crowe, K., McLeod, S., McKinnon, D. H., & Ching, T. Y. C. (2014). Speech, sign, or multilingualism for children with hearing loss: Quantitative insights into caregivers' decision-making. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 234-247. doi:10.1044/2014_LSHSS-12-0106. Estabrooks, W., Maclver-Lux, K., & Rhoades, E.A. (2016). Auditory-verbal therapy: For young children with hearing loss and their families, and the practitioners who guide them. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing. Estabrooks, W., Morrison, H.M.C. & MacIver-Lux, K. (2020). Auditory-Verbal Therapy: Science, Research, and Practice. Plural Publishing, Incorporated. Fitzpatrick, E. M., Hamel, C., Stevens, A., Pratt, M., Moher, D., Doucet, S. P., Neuss, D.,.... Na, E. (2016). Sign Language and Spoken Language for Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics, 137(1), 10.1542/peds.2015-1974. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1974. Flaherty, M. (2015). What We Can Learn from Hearing Parents of Deaf Children. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 67-84. doi:10.1017/jse.2014.19. Hamzah, M. S. J., Shamsuddin, S., Miskam, M. A., Yussof, H., Hashim, K. S. (2014). Development of Interaction Scenarios Based on pre-school Curriculum in Robotic Intervention for Children with Autism. International Conference on Robot PRIDE 2013-2014 - Medical and Rehabilitation Robotics and Instrumentation, ConfPRIDE 2013-2014, Procedia Computer Science, 42, 214–221, Elsevier. Homburg, D., Thieme, M. S., Völker, J., Stock, R. (2019). RoboTalk – Prototyping a Humanoid Robot as Speech-to-Sign Language Translator. Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 118839, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL). Hummes, L. E, Bess, F. H. (2008). Audiology and Communication Disorders: An Overview. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Ioannou, A., & Andreeva, A. (2019). Play and Learn with an Intelligent Robot: Enhancing the Therapy of Hearing-Impaired Children. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (pp. 436-452). Cham: Springer. Ioannou, A., Kartapanis, I. & Zaphiris, P. (2015). Social Robots as Co-Therapists in Autism Therapy Sessions: A Single-Case Study. In: Social Robotics, vol. 9388 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 255-263. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. Kitani, M., Hara, T., & Sawada, H. (2011). Voice articulatory training with a talking robot for the auditory impaired. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJDHD.2011.012. Kitani, M., Hayashi, Y., & Sawada, H. (2008). Interactive training of speech articulation for hearing impaired using a talking robot. Kose-Bagci, H. & Yorganci, R. (2011). Tale of a robot: Humanoid Robot Assisted Sign Language Tutoring. In: 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 105-111. IEEE, Bled Slovenia. Lee, H. W., & Hyun, E. J. (2015). The Intelligent Robot Contents for Children with Speech-Language Disorder. Educational Technology & Society, vol.18, No 3, p. 100–113. Malik, N. A., Yussof, H., & Hanapiah, F. A. (2014). Development of imitation learning through physical therapy using a humanoid robot. Procedia Computer Science, 42, 191-197. Marshark, M. & Hauser, P. C. (2012). How Deaf Children Learn: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know. Oxford University Press. Nalin, M., Baroni, I., Kruijff-Korbayová, I., Cañamero, L., Lewis, M., Beck, A., Cuayáhuitl, H., & Sanna, A. (2012). Children's adaptation in multi-session interaction with a humanoid robot. 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 351-357). Paul, P. V., & Whitelaw, G. M. (2010). Hearing and deafness. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Polycarpou, P., Andreeva, A., Ioannou, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2016). Don’t read my lips: assessing listening and speaking skills through play with a humanoid robot. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 255-260), Springer, Cham. Robins,...

1 January 2024 in International Journal of Games and Social Impact
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAnna Lekova
Anna Lekova
PTPaulina Tsvetkova
Paulina Tsvetkova
Anna AndreevaAnna Andreeva
Anna Andreeva
Brain health is a critical part of well-being because it is a foundation for the ability to communicate, make decisions and solve real-life problems. Virtual reality games involve motor and sensory activities that can help to improve brain connectivity by providing an immersive and interactive experience that engages multiple brain regions simultaneously. Reinforcing sensorimotor activities influences cognitive skills and improves brain health. Sensorimotor play in virtual reality is a relatively new concept that is gaining attention as a tool for promoting brain health and cognitive abilities. It is believed that this type of play can have positive impact on brain health and cognitive function, such as improving memory, enhancing focus, and reducing stress and anxiety. The aims of the current paper are (1) – to present evidence, based on neuro correlates, of the importance of the sensorimotor play to the brain health and (2) – to propose a conceptual model for a personalized VR game design using neurocognitive feedback obtained through Brain-Computer Interface that assesses brain areas during sensorimotor stimulation.