VUILLEMIN, A., J-M. OPPERT, F. GUILLEMIN, L. ESSERMEANT, A-M. FONTVIEILLE, P. GALAN, A. M. KRISKA, and S. HERCBERG. Self-administered questionnaire compared with interview to assess past-year physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1119–1124, 2000. The Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) is a physical activity questionnaire shown to be both valid and reliable and was initially designed to be interviewer-administered. After translation and adaptation into French, the objective of the study was to compare past-year physical activity data obtained by self-administration of this questionnaire and by interviewer-administration. 84 subjects (22 men, 62 women, age 36–63 yr) enrolled in an ongoing prospective study in France (the SUpplémentation en VItamines et Minéraux AntioXydants or SU.VI.MAX study) completed both versions of the questionnaire in a randomized order with a mean (SD) delay of 7.9 (5.8) d between the two modes. Past-year leisure and occupational physical activity were expressed as both h·wk−1 and MET-h·wk−1 of activity, and television watching was expressed as h·d−1. Analysis of variance on ranks was used to compare activity variables obtained by self-administration and interview. Agreement was assessed by nonparametric intraclass correlation coefficients. A significant effect of the mode of administration was found only for past-year leisure physical activity with lower values reported in self-administered conditions compared with interview. However, a high level of concordance between the two modes of administration was observed for all variables as shown by the intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.90 for leisure physical activity (h·wk−1), 0.82 for occupational activity (h·wk−1), 0.83 for total (leisure and occupational combined) physical activity (h·wk−1), and 0.97 for television viewing (h·d−1). The agreement between the two modes of administration of the questionnaire suggests that the self-administered version of the MAQ is a valuable tool to assess past-year physical activity and inactivity in self-administered conditions. This instrument could be used in large-scale population studies investigating the relationships between physical activity and health outcomes.
Although weight, lean mass, fat mass and muscular strength are often found to be intercorrelated, the respective role of each parameter in bone mineral density (BMD) remains unknown in older women. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between body weight and composition and quadriceps strength on femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD in healthy postmenopausal women. The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength measured by Biodex and BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was studied in 56 women aged 60–81 (70.5 ± 6.2) years in multiple regression models adjusted for age, body composition and menopausal treatment. Weight and age were associated with femoral neck BMD (33 and 10% of variance accounted for, respectively) and lumbar spine BMD (23 and 8% of its variance). When body weight and quadriceps strength were excluded from the model, lean mass and age were associated with femoral neck BMD (29 and 14% of variance explained, respectively) and lumbar spine BMD (28 and 11% of variance explained, respectively). When quadriceps strength was entered into the model, it was strongly associated with femoral neck BMD (30% of variance accounted for), in addition to lean mass (9%) and age (7%), whereas it was not associated with lumbar spine BMD. In conclusion, lean mass explains a great part of the strong association between body weight and femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD. Quadriceps strength explains a great part of the association between lean mass and BMD at the femoral neck site but not at the lumbar spine site. These results suggest a site-specific effect of muscular strength on bone and a potential role of the age-related decline of muscle strength in age-related bone loss in postmenopausal women.
Faced with the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, regulatory measures aiming to prevent interpersonal contaminations have been undertaken and among these, lockdown. Due to strong restrictions out-of-home movements, we hypothesize that overall physical activity will decrease and sedentary behavior increase. This could result in highest exposure to the well-known risk related to insufficient physical activity. To mitigate physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors health-related risks related to children and adolescents lockdown and school closure, Anses (French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety) has adapted, within the first days of the public authorities’ prescription, its former benchmarks. This paper supports and comments Anses’ Opinion by raising the questions of whether, why, and how to deal with short- or medium-term lockdown-related physical inactivity and sedentary behavior increases. Short-term and unknown long term-impacts on mental health and well-being, physical fitness and eating behaviors clearly appearing for children and adolescents as being the main issues of concern are highlighted. Targeting the compensations of the physical inactivity increase, the types, frequencies and durations of physical activity, are adapted to restricted environment. Sedentary behavior limitation and frequent interruptions becomes a priority. Overall, considering children and adolescents, the emerging risk justifies proposing specific adaptations and type of activities in order to ensure maintaining health underpinned, at least partly, by physiological equilibrium and physical fitness and avoid the installation of new unhealthy habits or routines that young people could keep after lockdown.