Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are pervasive organic pollutants in the environment that are formed as an outcome of partial combustion of organic matter. PAHs pose a significant threat to ecological systems and human health due to their cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. Therefore, an immediate need for effective PAH remediation methods is crucial. Although nanomaterials are effective for remediation of PAHs, concerns regarding environmental compatibility and sustainability remains. Therefore, this study emphasizes integration of nanomaterials with bioremediation methods, which might offer a more sustainable and ecofriendly approach to PAHs remediation. A systematic search was conducted through scholarly databases from 2013 to 2023. A total of 360 articles were scrutinized, among which 26 articles were selected that resonated with the application of nano-bioremediation. These literatures comprise both comparative analysis of bioremediation only as well as nano-bioremediation. There is an elevation of 18.9 % in PAHs removal of liquid-phase samples, when comparing bioremediation (52.2 %) with nano-bioremediation (71.1 %). A consistent trend was observed in soil samples, with bioremediation and nano-bioremediation that successfully remove PAHs, with 60.8 % and 75.1 % respectively, indicating a 14.3 % improvement. Furthermore, the review elaborated on the various features of nanomaterials that led to their efficiency in the bioremediation of PAH. The review also discussed the strategies of nano-bioremediation namely nanomaterial-assisted microbial degradation, nanomaterial-assisted enzyme-enhanced microbial activity, nanomaterial-immobilized microbial cells, nanomaterial-facilitated electron transfer, and even some eco-green approaches to remediate PAHs, like biogenic nanomaterial for PAHs.

The current investigation explores biogas production from water hyacinth (WH) and fish waste (FW) with cow dung (CD) as an inoculum source in two scenarios. In the first scenario, the optimization of mono-digestion was performed where the effect of WH/FW (substrates) with CD (inoculum) in varied ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 2:1, and 3:1 was observed to enhance the biogas production. In the second scenario, the optimization of co-digestion using both FW and WH as substrates in different ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 2:1) with a fixed amount of inoculum was studied. The experiments were conducted in 500 mL digesters in duplicate under mesophilic conditions. Under mono-digestion conditions for FW, the digester operating with FW/CD in a 1:2 ratio demonstrated the highest biogas yield of 970 ± 14.1 mL/g VS, containing 610 CH₄ mL/g VS, while in WH, the WH/CD ratio of 1:1 exhibited the highest biogas yield of 925 ± 49.4 mL/g VS, with a methane content of 440 CH₄ mL/g VS. The co-digestion of the WH/FW ratio (1:1) showcased the highest biogas production of 1655 ± 91.92 mL/g VS, accompanied by 890 ± 70.7 CH₄ mL/g VS. This was followed by the 1:2 and 2:1 ratio, yielding 1400 ± 56.5 and 1140 ± 169.7 mL/g VS. of biogas and 775 and 585 CH₄ mL/g VS, respectively. The CD and WH mixture at a 1:1 ratio demonstrated the most significant decrease in chemical oxygen demand (COD), reaching 91.68%. COD reductions over 80% in all combinations were observed in all instances. Anaerobic digestion (AD) simulations were validated using the Gompertz model, with high correlation coefficient values (R-squared) above 0.99 for all of the studied ratios, depicting a significant correlation between experimental data and model predictions. The propionic to acetic acid ratio did not cross the threshold level, indicating no inhibition of methane production. ANOVA analysis of biogas production between the co-digestion and mono-digestion of substrates showed non-significant results (p > 0.310 and p > 0.824, respectively), while overall digestion was significant (p < 0.024), indicating efficiency variations among substrates. Paired sample t-tests revealed substantial differences between co-digestion ratios, which were also significant.