PURPOSE: Meningiomas are the most frequent primary intracranial tumors. Patient outcome varies widely from benign to highly aggressive, ultimately fatal courses. Reliable identification of risk of progression for individual patients is of pivotal importance. However, only biomarkers for highly aggressive tumors are established ( CDKN2A/B and TERT), whereas no molecularly based stratification exists for the broad spectrum of patients with low- and intermediate-risk meningioma.METHODS: DNA methylation data and copy-number information were generated for 3,031 meningiomas (2,868 patients), and mutation data for 858 samples. DNA methylation subgroups, copy-number variations (CNVs), mutations, and WHO grading were analyzed. Prediction power for outcome was assessed in a retrospective cohort of 514 patients, validated on a retrospective cohort of 184, and on a prospective cohort of 287 multicenter cases.RESULTS: Both CNV- and methylation family–based subgrouping independently resulted in increased prediction accuracy of risk of recurrence compared with the WHO classification (c-indexes WHO 2016, CNV, and methylation family 0.699, 0.706, and 0.721, respectively). Merging all risk stratification approaches into an integrated molecular-morphologic score resulted in further substantial increase in accuracy (c-index 0.744). This integrated score consistently provided superior accuracy in all three cohorts, significantly outperforming WHO grading (c-index difference P = .005). Besides the overall stratification advantage, the integrated score separates more precisely for risk of progression at the diagnostically challenging interface of WHO grade 1 and grade 2 tumors (hazard ratio 4.34 [2.48-7.57] and 3.34 [1.28-8.72] retrospective and prospective validation cohorts, respectively).CONCLUSION: Merging these layers of histologic and molecular data into an integrated, three-tiered score significantly improves the precision in meningioma stratification. Implementation into diagnostic routine informs clinical decision making for patients with meningioma on the basis of robust outcome prediction.

Molecular data integration plays a central role in central nervous system (CNS) tumor diagnostics but currently used assays pose limitations due to technical complexity, equipment and reagent costs, as well as lengthy turnaround times. We previously reported the development of Rapid-CNS², an adaptive-sampling-based nanopore sequencing workflow. Here we comprehensively validated and further developed Rapid-CNS² for intraoperative use. It now offers real-time methylation classification and DNA copy number information within a 30-min intraoperative window, followed by comprehensive molecular profiling within 24 h, covering the complete spectrum of diagnostically and therapeutically relevant information for the respective entity. We validated Rapid-CNS² in a multicenter setting on 301 archival and prospective samples including 18 samples sequenced intraoperatively. To broaden the utility of methylation-based CNS tumor classification, we developed MNP-Flex, a platform-agnostic methylation classifier encompassing 184 classes. MNP-Flex achieved 99.6% accuracy for methylation families and 99.2% accuracy for methylation classes with clinically applicable thresholds across a global validation cohort of more than 78,000 frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples spanning five different technologies. Integration of these tools has the potential to advance CNS tumor diagnostics by providing broad access to rapid, actionable molecular insights crucial for personalized treatment strategies.

An obstacle to effective uniform treatment of glioblastoma, especially at recurrence, is genetic and cellular intertumoral heterogeneity. Hence, personalized strategies are necessary, as are means to stratify potential targeted therapies in a clinically relevant timeframe. Functional profiling of drug candidates against patient-derived glioblastoma organoids (PD-GBO) holds promise as an empirical method to preclinically discover potentially effective treatments of individual tumors. Here, we describe our establishment of a PD-GBO-based functional profiling platform and the results of its application to four patient tumors. We show that our PD-GBO model system preserves key features of individual patient glioblastomas in vivo. As proof of concept, we tested a panel of 41 FDA-approved drugs and were able to identify potential treatment options for three out of four patients; the turnaround from tumor resection to discovery of treatment option was 13, 14, and 15 days, respectively. These results demonstrate that this approach is a complement and, potentially, an alternative to current molecular profiling efforts in the pursuit of effective personalized treatment discovery in a clinically relevant time period. Furthermore, these results warrant the use of PD-GBO platforms for preclinical identification of new drugs against defined morphological glioblastoma features.

Purpose: Primary central nervous system (CNS) gliomas can be classified by characteristic genetic alterations. In addition to solid tissue obtained via surgery or biopsy, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an alternative source of material for genomic analyses. Experimental Design: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of CSF cfDNA in a representative cohort of 85 patients presenting at two neurooncological centers with suspicion of primary or recurrent glioma. Copy-number variation (CNV) profiles, single-nucleotide variants (SNV), and small insertions/deletions (indel) were combined into a molecular-guided tumor classification. Comparison with the solid tumor was performed for 38 cases with matching solid tissue available. Results: Cases were stratified into four groups: glioblastoma (n = 32), other glioma (n = 19), nonmalignant (n = 17), and nondiagnostic (n = 17). We introduced a molecular-guided tumor classification, which enabled identification of tumor entities and/or cancer-specific alterations in 75.0% (n = 24) of glioblastoma and 52.6% (n = 10) of other glioma cases. The overlap between CSF and matching solid tissue was highest for CNVs (26%–48%) and SNVs at predefined gene loci (44%), followed by SNVs/indels identified via uninformed variant calling (8%–14%). A molecular-guided tumor classification was possible for 23.5% (n = 4) of nondiagnostic cases. Conclusions: We developed a targeted sequencing workflow for CSF cfDNA as well as a strategy for interpretation and reporting of sequencing results based on a molecular-guided tumor classification in glioma.

Background: Advances in our technological capacity to interrogate CNS tumor biology have led to the ever increasing use of genomic sequencing in diagnostic decision making. Presently, CNS tumors are classified based on their epigenetic signatures, leading to a paradigm shift in diagnostic pathways. Such testing can be performed so rapidly using nanopore sequencing that results can be provided intraoperatively. This information greatly improves the fidelity of smear diagnosis and can help surgeons tailor their approach, balancing the risks of surgery with the likely benefit. Nevertheless, full integrated diagnosis may require subsequent additional assays to detect pathognomonic somatic mutations and structural variants, thereby delaying the time to final diagnosis. Methods: Here, we present ROBIN, a tool based on PromethION nanopore sequencing technology that can provide both real-time, intraoperative methylome classification and next-day comprehensive molecular profiling within a single assay. ROBIN utilizes 3 methylation classifiers to improve diagnostic performance in the intraoperative setting. Results: We demonstrate classifier performance on 50 prospective intraoperative cases, achieving a diagnostic turnaround time under 2 hours and generating robust tumor classifications within minutes of sequencing. Furthermore, ROBIN can detect single nucleotide variants, copy number variants, and structural variants in real time, and is able to inform a complete integrated diagnosis within 24 hours. Classifier performance demonstrated concordance with final integrated diagnosis in 90% of prospective cases. Conclusion: Nanopore sequencing can greatly improve turnaround times for standard-of-care diagnostic testing and is furthermore able to reliably provide clinically actionable intraoperative tumor classification.