Alexander Brand

Dr. Alexander Brand

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in Cement and Concrete Composites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
JRJeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler

1 March 2015 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
JRJeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler
ASAndres Salas
Andres Salas

1 January 2017 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
JRJeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler

1 January 2017 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
JRJeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler

19 November 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
EFEbenezer Fanijo
Ebenezer Fanijo
The type of steel furnace slag (SFS), including electric arc furnace (EAF) slag, basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag, ladle metallurgy furnace (LMF) slag, and argon oxygen decarburization (AOD) slag, can significantly affect the composite properties when used as an aggregate or as a supplementary cementitious material in bound applications, such as concretes, mortars, alkali-activated materials, and stabilized soils. This review seeks to collate the findings from the literature to express the variability in material properties and to attempt to explain the source(s) of the variability. It was found that SFS composition and properties can be highly variable, including different compositions on the exterior and interior of a given SFS particle, which can affect bonding conditions and be one source of variability on composite properties. A suite of tests is proposed to better assess a given SFS stock for potential use in bound applications; at a minimum, the SFS should be evaluated for free CaO content, expansion potential, mineralogical composition, cementitious composite mechanical properties, and chemical composition with secondary tests, including cementitious composite durability properties, microstructural characterization, and free MgO content.

1 February 2018 in Cement and Concrete Composites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alexander BrandAlexander Brand
Alexander Brand
JRJeffery R. Roesler
Jeffery R. Roesler