Pierre Bize

Pierre Bize

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Pierre Bize

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2009 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPierre Bize
Pierre Bize
FCFrançois Criscuolo
François Criscuolo
NMNeil B Metcalfe
Neil B Metcalfe
LNLubna Nasir
Lubna Nasir
PMPat Monaghan
Pat Monaghan
Despite accumulating evidence from in vitro studies that cellular senescence is linked to telomere dynamics, how this relates to whole-organism senescence and longevity is poorly understood and controversial. Using data on telomere length in red blood cells and long-term survival from wild Alpine swifts of a range of ages, we report that the telomere length and the rate of telomere loss are predictive of life expectancy, and that slow erosion of relatively long telomeres is associated with the highest survival probabilities. Importantly, because telomere dynamics, rather than chronological age, predict life expectancy, our study provides good evidence for a mechanistic link between telomere erosion and reduced organism longevity under natural conditions, chronological age itself possibly not becoming a significant predictor until very old ages beyond those in our sample.

1 September 2008 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPierre Bize
Pierre Bize
GDGodefroy Devevey
Godefroy Devevey
PMPatricia Monaghan
Patricia Monaghan
BDBlandine Doligez
Blandine Doligez
PCPhilippe Christe
Philippe Christe

13 August 2018 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMaxime Cauchoix
Maxime Cauchoix
PCPizza Ka Yee Chow
Pizza Ka Yee Chow
JHJayden van Horik
Jayden van Horik
CAC. M. Atance
C. M. Atance
EBE. J. Barbeau
E. J. Barbeau
JMJ. Morand-Ferron
J. Morand-Ferron
Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability ( R ) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities’.

30 November 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PVPierre de Villemereuil
Pierre de Villemereuil
ACAnne Charmantier
Anne Charmantier
DADebora Arlt
Debora Arlt
PBPierre Bize
Pierre Bize
PBPatricia Brekke
Patricia Brekke
LCLuis-Miguel Chevin
Luis-Miguel Chevin
Significance: Many ecological and evolutionary processes strongly depend on the way natural selection varies over time. However, a gap remains when trying to connect theoretical predictions to empirical work on this question: Most theory assumes that adaptation involves tracking a moving optimum phenotype through time, but this is seldom estimated empirically. Here, we have assembled a large database of wild bird and mammal populations, to estimate patterns of fluctuations in the optimum breeding date and its influence on the variability of natural selection. We find that optimum fluctuations are prevalent. However, their influence on temporal variance in natural selection is partly buffered by tracking of the optimum phenotype through individual phenotypic plasticity.

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Zoology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAntoine Stier
Antoine Stier
SRSophie Reichert
Sophie Reichert
SMSylvie Massemin
Sylvie Massemin
PBPierre Bize
Pierre Bize
FCFrançois Criscuolo
François Criscuolo
One central concept in evolutionary ecology is that current and residual reproductive values are negatively linked by the so-called cost of reproduction. Previous studies examining the nature of this cost suggested a possible involvement of oxidative stress resulting from the imbalance between pro- and anti-oxidant processes. Still, data remain conflictory probably because, although oxidative damage increases during reproduction, high systemic levels of oxidative stress might also constrain parental investment in reproduction. Here, we investigated variation in oxidative balance (i.e. oxidative damage and antioxidant defences) over the course of reproduction by comparing female laboratory mice rearing or not pups.

1 October 2015 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJames A. Mills
James A. Mills
CTCeline Teplitsky
Celine Teplitsky
BABeatriz Arroyo
Beatriz Arroyo
ACAnne Charmantier
Anne Charmantier
PBPeter. H. Becker
Peter. H. Becker
AZAndreas Zedrosser
Andreas Zedrosser
The recent trend for journals to require open access to primary data included in publications has been embraced by many biologists, but has caused apprehension amongst researchers engaged in long-term ecological and evolutionary studies. A worldwide survey of 73 principal investigators (Pls) with long-term studies revealed positive attitudes towards sharing data with the agreement or involvement of the PI, and 93% of PIs have historically shared data. Only 8% were in favor of uncontrolled, open access to primary data while 63% expressed serious concern. We present here their viewpoint on an issue that can have non-trivial scientific consequences. We discuss potential costs of public data archiving and provide possible solutions to meet the needs of journals and researchers.