Rebecca M. Pearson

Rebecca M. Pearson

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Rebecca M. Pearson

Manchester Metropolitan University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlan Stein
Alan Stein
RPRebecca M Pearson
Rebecca M Pearson
SGSherryl H Goodman
Sherryl H Goodman
ERElizabeth Rapa
Elizabeth Rapa
ARAtif Rahman
Atif Rahman
CPCarmine M Pariante
Carmine M Pariante

1 October 2014 in JAMA Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGolam M. Khandaker
Golam M. Khandaker
RPRebecca M. Pearson
Rebecca M. Pearson
SZStanley Zammit
Stanley Zammit
GLGlyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis
PJPeter Martin Jones
Peter Martin Jones
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide.1 It affects approximately 16% of Americans during their lifetime, with approximately 25% of these cases beginning before age 20 years.2,3 Psychotic disorders (including schizophrenia) are some of the most enduring neuropsychiatric illnesses, with a lifetime risk of 1% to 2% in the United States.4 Globally, schizophrenia is an important cause of disability among young people and is associated with premature death, largely from heart disease.5,6 Longitudinal studies7-11 have linked higher levels of circulating inflammatory markers such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), with subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart disease. These chronic physical conditions often occur concomitantly with depression and psychotic disorders12,13 and may share pathophysiologic mechanisms.

1 December 2013 in JAMA Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRebecca M. Pearson
Rebecca M. Pearson
JEJonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans
DKDaphne Kounali
Daphne Kounali
GLGlyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis
JHJon Heron
Jon Heron
ASAlan Stein
Alan Stein
Some small studies suggest that maternal postnatal depression is a risk factor for offspring adolescent depression. However, to our knowledge, no large cohort studies have addressed this issue. Furthermore, only 1 small study has examined the association between antenatal depression and later offspring depression. Understanding these associations is important to inform prevention. To investigate the hypothesis that there are independent associations between antenatal and postnatal depression with offspring depression and that the risk pathways are different, such that the risk is moderated by disadvantage (low maternal education) with postnatal depression but not with antenatal depression. Prospective investigation of associations between symptoms of antenatal and postnatal parental depression with offspring depression at age 18 years in a UK community-based birth cohort (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children) with data from more than 4500 parents and their adolescent offspring. Diagnosis of offspring aged 18 years with major depression using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Antenatal depression was an independent risk factor. Offspring were 1.28 times (95% CI, 1.08-1.51; P = .003) more likely to have depression at age 18 years for each standard deviation increase in maternal depression score antenatally, independent of later maternal depression. Postnatal depression was also a risk factor for mothers with low education, with offspring 1.26 times (95% CI, 1.06-1.50; P = .01) more likely to have depression for each standard deviation increase in postnatal depression score. However, for more educated mothers, there was little association (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88-1.36; P = .42). Analyses found that maternal education moderated the effects of postnatal but not antenatal depression. Paternal depression antenatally was not associated with offspring depression, while postnatally, paternal depression showed a similar pattern to maternal depression. The findings suggest that treating maternal depression antenatally could prevent offspring depression during adulthood and that prioritizing less advantaged mothers postnatally may be most effective.

30 April 2014 in Depression and Anxiety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLexine Stapinski
Lexine Stapinski
LBLucy Bowes
Lucy Bowes
DWDieter Wolke
Dieter Wolke
RPRebecca M. Pearson
Rebecca M. Pearson
LMLiam Mahedy
Liam Mahedy
RARicardo Araya
Ricardo Araya
Background Peer victimization is ubiquitous across schools and cultures, and has been suggested as one developmental pathway to anxiety disorders. However, there is a dearth of prospective studies examining this relationship. The purpose of this cohort study was to examine the association between peer victimization during adolescence and subsequent anxiety diagnoses in adulthood. A secondary aim was to investigate whether victimization increases risk for severe anxiety presentations involving diagnostic comorbidity. Methods The sample comprised 6,208 adolescents from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children who were interviewed about experiences of peer victimization at age 13. Maternal report of her child's victimization was also assessed. Anxiety disorders at age 18 were assessed with the Clinical Interview Schedule–Revised. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between victimization and anxiety diagnoses adjusted for potentially confounding individual and family factors. Sensitivity analyses explored whether the association was independent of diagnostic comorbidity with depression. Results Frequently victimized adolescents were two to three times more likely to develop an anxiety disorder than nonvictimized adolescents (OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.62–3.85). The association remained after adjustment for potentially confounding individual and family factors, and was not attributable to diagnostic overlap with depression. Frequently victimized adolescents were also more likely to develop multiple internalizing diagnoses in adulthood. Conclusions Victimized adolescents are at increased risk of anxiety disorders in later life. Interventions to reduce peer victimization and provide support for victims may be an effective strategy for reducing the burden associated with these disorders.

1 November 2015 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLauren Carson
Lauren Carson
VGVivette Glover
Vivette Glover
RPRebecca M. Pearson
Rebecca M. Pearson
JEJonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans
TOThomas G. O’connor
Thomas G. O’connor
PRPaul G. Ramchandani
Paul G. Ramchandani
Maternal antenatal depression and anxiety are associated with increased risk of childhood behavioural and emotional problems in offspring; it remains unclear to what extent this is due to a maternal biological impact on foetal development. Here, we compare associations between maternal and paternal antenatal depression and anxiety with offspring anxiety disorders, thus controlling for some genetic and shared environmental factors. We used data from the ALSPAC population cohort including measures of antenatal parental depression and anxiety. At 18 years, offspring completed the CIS-R interview, yielding diagnoses for anxiety disorders. Results were adjusted for confounding variables including parental postnatal depression and anxiety. Children of women with antenatal depression (18 weeks gestation), had an increased risk of anxiety disorders at 18 years of age (11.1% vs. 6.2%; adj. OR 1.75 (1.19, 2.58); p=0.01). Children of women with antenatal anxiety had increased risk of co-morbid anxiety and depression (adj. OR 1.39 (1.06, 1.82); p=0.02). No such associations were found with paternal antenatal depression or anxiety. There was a high attrition rate from the original cohort to the CIS-R completion at 18 years postpartum. Parental mood was only assessed together at one time point during the antenatal period. The differences in the association between maternal and paternal mood during pregnancy and child outcomes supports the hypothesis that foetal programming may account, at least in part, for this association. We highlight the potential opportunity for preventative intervention by optimising antenatal mental health.

29 November 2015 in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRebecca M. Pearson
Rebecca M. Pearson
MBMarc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein
MCMiguel Cordero
Miguel Cordero
GSGaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif
LMLiam Mahedy
Liam Mahedy
ASAlan Stein
Alan Stein
Background: Elucidating risk pathways for under‐achieving at school can inform strategies to reduce the number of adolescents leaving school without passing grades in core subjects. Maternal depression can compromise the quality of parental care and is associated with multiple negative child outcomes. However, only a few small studies have investigated the association between perinatal maternal depression and poor academic achievement in adolescence. The pathways to explain the risks are also unclear. Method: Prospective observational data from 5,801 parents and adolescents taking part in a large UK population cohort (Avon‐Longitudinal‐Study‐of‐Parents‐and‐Children) were used to test associations between maternal and paternal depression and anxiety in the perinatal period, executive function ( EF ) at age 8, and academic achievement at the end of compulsory school at age 16. Results: Adolescents of postnatally depressed mothers were 1.5 times (1.19, 1.94, p = .001) as likely as adolescents of nondepressed mothers to fail to achieve a ‘pass’ grade in math; antenatal anxiety was also an independent predictor of poor math. Disruption in different components of EF explained small but significant proportions of these associations: attentional control explained 16% (4%, 27%, p < .001) of the association with postnatal depression, and working memory explained 17% (13%, 30%, p = .003) of the association with antenatal anxiety. A similar pattern was seen for language grades, but associations were confounded by maternal education. There was no evidence that paternal factors were independently associated with impaired child EF or adolescent exams. Conclusion: Maternal postnatal depression and antenatal anxiety are risk factors for adolescents underachieving in math. Preventing, identifying, and treating maternal mental health in the perinatal period could, therefore, potentially increase adolescents’ academic achievement. Different aspects of EF partially mediated these associations. Further work is needed, but if these pathways are causal, improving EF could reduce underachievement in math.