Philip W. Stevens

Philip W. Stevens

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Philip W. Stevens

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMichael J. Osland
Michael J. Osland
PSPhilip W. Stevens
Philip W. Stevens
MLMargaret M. Lamont
Margaret M. Lamont
RBRichard C. Brusca
Richard C. Brusca
KHKristen Hart
Kristen Hart
JSJeffrey A. Seminoff
Jeffrey A. Seminoff

1 October 2006 in Wetlands Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPhilip W. Stevens
Philip W. Stevens
SFSandra L. Fox
Sandra L. Fox
CMClay L. Montague
Clay L. Montague


1 December 2006 in Estuaries and Coasts
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPhilip W. Stevens
Philip W. Stevens
DBDavid A. Blewett
David A. Blewett
JCJ. Patrick Casey
J. Patrick Casey

18 August 2016 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSP. W. Stevens
P. W. Stevens
DBD. A. Blewett
D. A. Blewett
RBR. E. Boucek
R. E. Boucek
JRJ. S. Rehage
J. S. Rehage
BWB. L. Winner
B. L. Winner
RPR. Paperno
R. Paperno
For species that are closely managed, understanding population resilience to environmental and anthropogenic disturbances (i.e., recovery trajectories across broad spatial areas) can guide which suite of management actions are available to mitigate any impacts. During January 2010, an extreme cold event in south Florida caused widespread mortality of common snook, Centropomus undecimalis, a popular sport fish. Interpretation of trends using fishery‐independent monitoring data in five south Florida estuaries showed that changes in catch rates of adult snook (>500 mm standard length) varied between no effects postevent to large effects and 4‐yr recoveries. The reasons for the variation across estuaries are unknown, but are likely related to differences in estuary geomorphology and habitat availability (e.g., extent of deep rivers and canals) and differences in the proportions of behavior contingents (i.e., segments of the population that use divergent movement tactics) that place snook in different areas of the estuary during winter. Emerging awareness of the presence of behavior contingents, identification of overwintering sites, and improvements of abundance indices in remote nursery habitats should provide a better understanding of population resilience to disturbance events for snook. Given that changes in the frequency of short‐lived, severe cold events are currently unknown, the findings and management actions described here for a tropical species living at the edge of its distribution should be useful to scientists forecasting the effects of climate change.

1 December 2018 in Fisheries Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPhilip W. Stevens
Philip W. Stevens
RBRoss E. Boucek
Ross E. Boucek
ATAlexis A. Trotter
Alexis A. Trotter
JRJared L. Ritch
Jared L. Ritch
EJEric R. Johnson
Eric R. Johnson
JRJennifer S. Rehage
Jennifer S. Rehage