Patrick T. Ryan

Patrick T. Ryan

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Patrick T. Ryan

Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2013 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DÓDiarmuid S. Ó’mAoiléidigh
Diarmuid S. Ó’mAoiléidigh
SWSamuel E. Wuest
Samuel E. Wuest
LRLiina Rae
Liina Rae
ARAndrea Raganelli
Andrea Raganelli
PRPatrick T. Ryan
Patrick T. Ryan
FWFrank Wellmer
Frank Wellmer
The floral organ identity factor AGAMOUS (AG) is a key regulator of Arabidopsis thaliana flower development, where it is involved in the formation of the reproductive floral organs as well as in the control of meristem determinacy. To obtain insights into how AG specifies organ fate, we determined the genes and processes acting downstream of this C function regulator during early flower development and distinguished between direct and indirect effects. To this end, we combined genome-wide localization studies, gene perturbation experiments, and computational analyses. Our results demonstrate that AG controls flower development to a large extent by controlling the expression of other genes with regulatory functions, which are involved in mediating a plethora of different developmental processes. One aspect of this function is the suppression of the leaf development program in emerging floral primordia. Using trichome initiation as an example, we demonstrate that AG inhibits an important aspect of leaf development through the direct control of key regulatory genes. A comparison of the gene expression programs controlled by AG and the B function regulators APETALA3 and PISTILLATA, respectively, showed that while they control many developmental processes in conjunction, they also have marked antagonistic, as well as independent activities.

6 April 2017 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKevin Goslin
Kevin Goslin
BZBeibei Zheng
Beibei Zheng
ASAntonio Serrano-Mislata
Antonio Serrano-Mislata
LRLiina Rae
Liina Rae
PRPatrick T. Ryan
Patrick T. Ryan
EGEmmanuelle Graciet
Emmanuelle Graciet
LEAFY and APETALA1/CAULIFLOWER have partially antagonistic activities in the control of floral initiation.

13 May 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRémi de Marchi
Rémi de Marchi
MSMaud Sorel
Maud Sorel
BMBrian Mooney
Brian Mooney
IFIsabelle Fudal
Isabelle Fudal
KGKevin Goslin
Kevin Goslin
EGEmmanuelle Graciet
Emmanuelle Graciet
To efficiently counteract pathogens, plants rely on a complex set of immune responses that are tightly regulated to allow the timely activation, appropriate duration and adequate amplitude of defense programs. The coordination of the plant immune response is known to require the activity of the ubiquitin/proteasome system, which controls the stability of proteins in eukaryotes. Here, we demonstrate that the N-end rule pathway, a subset of the ubiquitin/proteasome system, regulates the defense against a wide range of bacterial and fungal pathogens in the model plantArabidopsis thaliana. We show that this pathway positively regulates the biosynthesis of plant-defense metabolites such as glucosinolates, as well as the biosynthesis and response to the phytohormone jasmonic acid, which plays a key role in plant immunity. Our results also suggest that the arginylation branch of the N-end rule pathway regulates the timing and amplitude of the defense program against the model pathogenPseudomonas syringaeAvrRpm1.

1 July 2015 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPatrick T. Ryan
Patrick T. Ryan
DÓDiarmuid S. Ó’mAoiléidigh
Diarmuid S. Ó’mAoiléidigh
HDHajk-Georg Drost
Hajk-Georg Drost
KKKamila Kwaśniewska
Kamila Kwaśniewska
AGAlexander Gabel
Alexander Gabel
FWFrank Wellmer
Frank Wellmer
The formation of flowers is one of the main model systems to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that control developmental processes in plants. Although several studies have explored gene expression during flower development in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana on a genome-wide scale, a continuous series of expression data from the earliest floral stages until maturation has been lacking. Here, we used a floral induction system to close this information gap and to generate a reference dataset for stage-specific gene expression during flower formation. Using a floral induction system, we collected floral buds at 14 different stages from the time of initiation until maturation. Using whole-genome microarray analysis, we identified 7,405 genes that exhibit rapid expression changes during flower development. These genes comprise many known floral regulators and we found that the expression profiles for these regulators match their known expression patterns, thus validating the dataset. We analyzed groups of co-expressed genes for over-represented cellular and developmental functions through Gene Ontology analysis and found that they could be assigned specific patterns of activities, which are in agreement with the progression of flower development. Furthermore, by mapping binding sites of floral organ identity factors onto our dataset, we were able to identify gene groups that are likely predominantly under control of these transcriptional regulators. We further found that the distribution of paralogs among groups of co-expressed genes varies considerably, with genes expressed predominantly at early and intermediate stages of flower development showing the highest proportion of such genes. Our results highlight and describe the dynamic expression changes undergone by a large number of genes during flower development. They further provide a comprehensive reference dataset for temporal gene expression during flower formation and we demonstrate that it can be used to integrate data from other genomics approaches such as genome-wide localization studies of transcription factor binding sites.

23 February 2016 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHajk-Georg Drost
Hajk-Georg Drost
JBJulia Bellstädt
Julia Bellstädt
DÓDiarmuid S. Ó'MAoiléidigh
Diarmuid S. Ó'MAoiléidigh
ASAnderson T. Silva
Anderson T. Silva
AGAlexander Gabel
Alexander Gabel
MQMarcel Quint
Marcel Quint
The historic developmental hourglass concept depicts the convergence of animal embryos to a common form during the phylotypic period. Recently, it has been shown that a transcriptomic hourglass is associated with this morphological pattern, consistent with the idea of underlying selective constraints due to intense molecular interactions during body plan establishment. Although plants do not exhibit a morphological hourglass during embryogenesis, a transcriptomic hourglass has nevertheless been identified in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, we investigated whether plant hourglass patterns are also found postembryonically. We found that the two main phase changes during the life cycle of Arabidopsis, from embryonic to vegetative and from vegetative to reproductive development, are associated with transcriptomic hourglass patterns. In contrast, flower development, a process dominated by organ formation, is not. This suggests that plant hourglass patterns are decoupled from organogenesis and body plan establishment. Instead, they may reflect general transitions through organizational checkpoints.

8 June 2015 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DÓDiarmuid S. Ó'MAoiléidigh
Diarmuid S. Ó'MAoiléidigh
BTBennett Thomson
Bennett Thomson
ARAndrea Raganelli
Andrea Raganelli
SWSamuel E. Wuest
Samuel E. Wuest
PRPatrick T. Ryan
Patrick T. Ryan
FWFrank Wellmer
Frank Wellmer