Robin E. Dodson

Robin E. Dodson

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Robin E. Dodson

Silent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada St, Newton, MA, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2012 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
LPLaura J. Perovich
Laura J. Perovich
Adrian CovaciAdrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci
NENele Van Den Eede
Nele Van Den Eede
AIAlin C. Ionas
Alin C. Ionas
RRRuthann A. Rudel
Ruthann A. Rudel
Higher house dust levels of PBDE flame retardants (FRs) have been reported in California than other parts of the world, due to the state’s furniture flammability standard. However, changing levels of these and other FRs have not been evaluated following the 2004 U.S. phase-out of PentaBDE and OctaBDE. We analyzed dust collected in 16 California homes in 2006 and again in 2011 for 62 FRs and organohalogens, which represents the broadest investigation of FRs in homes. Fifty-five compounds were detected in at least one sample; 41 in at least 50% of samples. Concentrations of chlorinated OPFRs, including two (TCEP and TDCIPP) listed as carcinogens under California’s Proposition 65, were found up to 0.01% in dust, higher than previously reported in the U.S. In 75% of the homes, we detected TDBPP, or brominated “Tris,” which was banned in children’s sleepwear because of carcinogenicity. To our knowledge, this is the first report on TDBPP in house dust. Concentrations of Firemaster 550 components (EH-TBB, BEH-TEBP, and TPHP) were higher in 2011 than 2006, consistent with its use as a PentaBDE replacement. Results highlight the evolving nature of FR exposures and suggest that manufacturers continue to use hazardous chemicals and replace chemicals of concern with chemicals with uncharacterized toxicity.

1 July 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
MNMarcia Nishioka
Marcia Nishioka
LSLaurel J. Standley
Laurel J. Standley
LPLaura J. Perovich
Laura J. Perovich
JBJulia Green Brody
Julia Green Brody
RRRuthann A. Rudel
Ruthann A. Rudel
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

12 November 2014 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
NENele Van Den Eede
Nele Van Den Eede
Adrian CovaciAdrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci
LPLaura J. Perovich
Laura J. Perovich
JBJulia Green Brody
Julia Green Brody
RRRuthann A. Rudel
Ruthann A. Rudel
Phosphate flame retardants (PFRs) are abundant and found at the highest concentrations relative to other flame retardant chemicals in house dust; however, little is known about the biological levels of PFRs and their relationship with house dust concentrations. These relationships provide insight into major exposure pathways and potential health risks. We analyzed urine samples from 16 California residents in 2011 for 6 chlorinated and nonchlorinated dialkyl or diaryl phosphates (DAPs), the expected major metabolites of the most prominent PFRs, and qualitatively screened for 18 other metabolites predicted from in vitro studies. We detected all 6 DAPs within the range of previously reported levels, although very few comparisons are available. We found weakly positive nonsignificant correlations between urine and dust concentrations and maxima urine corresponding to maxima dust for the pairs bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP)-tris(1,3-dichloro-isopropyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) and bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (BCEP)-tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP). Metabolite levels of PFRs were correlated for many PFR combinations, suggesting they commonly co-occur. As far as we know, this is the first study to measure these 6 DAP metabolites simultaneously and to detect other PFR metabolites in US urine samples. We recommend biomonitoring studies include these 6 DAPs as well as several additional compounds detected through qualitative screening and previous ADME studies. PFRs represent a class of poorly studied commercial chemicals with widespread exposure and raise concerns for health effects including carcinogenicity and neurotoxicity.

6 May 2021 in Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
BCBethsaida Cardona
Bethsaida Cardona
AZAmi R. Zota
Ami R. Zota
JFJanette Robinson Flint
Janette Robinson Flint
SNSandy Navarro
Sandy Navarro
BSBhavna Shamasunder
Bhavna Shamasunder

9 December 2014 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
DCDavid E. Camann
David E. Camann
RMRachel Morello-Frosch
Rachel Morello-Frosch
JBJulia G. Brody
Julia G. Brody
RRRuthann A. Rudel
Ruthann A. Rudel
Residential exposure can dominate total exposure for commercial chemicals of health concern; however, despite the importance of consumer exposures, methods for estimating household exposures remain limited. We collected house dust and indoor air samples in 49 California homes and analyzed for 76 semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs)—phthalates, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and pesticides. Sixty chemicals were detected in either dust or air and here we report 58 SVOCs detected in dust for the first time. In dust, phthalates (bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate) and flame retardants (PBDE 99, PBDE 47) were detected at the highest concentrations relative to other chemicals at the 95th percentile, while phthalates were highest at the median. Because SVOCs are found in both gas and condensed phases and redistribute from their original source over time, partitioning models can clarify their fate indoors. We use empirical data to validate air-dust partitioning models and use these results, combined with experience in SVOC exposure assessment, to recommend residential exposure measurement strategies. We can predict dust concentrations reasonably well from measured air concentrations (R2 = 0.80). Partitioning models and knowledge of chemical Koa elucidate exposure pathways and suggest priorities for chemical regulation. These findings also inform study design by allowing researchers to select sampling approaches optimized for their chemicals of interest and study goals. While surface wipes are commonly used in epidemiology studies because of ease of implementation, passive air sampling may be more standardized between homes and also relatively simple to deploy. Validation of passive air sampling methods for SVOCs is a priority.

1 September 2020 in International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RDRobin E. Dodson
Robin E. Dodson
KBKatherine E. Boronow
Katherine E. Boronow
HSHerbert Susmann
Herbert Susmann
JUJulia O. Udesky
Julia O. Udesky
KRKathryn M. Rodgers
Kathryn M. Rodgers
RRRuthann A. Rudel
Ruthann A. Rudel
Nearly all Americans have detectable concentrations of endocrine disrupting chemicals from consumer products in their bodies, and expert panels recommend reducing exposures. To inform exposure reduction, we investigated whether consumers who are trying to avoid certain chemicals in consumer products have lower exposures than those who are not. We also aimed to make exposure biomonitoring more widely available. We enrolled 726 participants in a crowdsourced biomonitoring study. We targeted phenolic compounds-specifically parabens, bisphenol A (BPA) and analogs bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS), the UV filter benzophenone-3, the anti-microbial triclosan, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and 2,5-dichlorophenol-and collected survey data on consumer products, cleaning habits, and efforts to avoid related chemicals. We investigated associations between 68 self-reported exposure behaviors and urine concentrations of ten chemicals, and evaluated whether associations were modified by intention to avoid exposures. A large majority (87%) of participants reported taking steps to limit exposure to specific chemicals, and, overall, participants achieved lower concentrations than the general U.S. population for parabens, BPA, triclosan, and benzophenone-3 but not BPF and BPS. Participants who reported avoiding all four ingredient groups-parabens, triclosan, bisphenols, and fragrances-were twice as likely as others to be in the lowest quartile of cumulative exposure. Avoiding certain products and reading ingredient labels to avoid chemicals was most effective for parabens, triclosan, and benzophenone-3. Avoiding BPA was not effective for reducing bisphenol exposures. Avoiding certain chemicals in products was generally associated with reduced exposure for chemicals listed on labels. Greater ingredient transparency will help consumers who read labels to reduce their exposure to a wider range of potentially harmful chemicals. In order to more equitably address public health, labeling policies should be complemented by regulations that exclude harmful chemicals from consumer products.