Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada; Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information
Jenia Vassileva
Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada; Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
In interventional cardiology, a wide variation in patient dose for the same type of procedure has been recognised by different studies. Variation is almost due to procedure complexity, equipment performance, procedure protocol and operator skill. The SENTINEL consortium has performed a survey in nine european centres collecting information on near 2000 procedures, and a new set of reference levels (RLs) for coronary angiography and angioplasty and diagnostic electrophysiology has been assessed for air kerma-area product: 45, 85 and 35 Gy cm2, effective dose: 8, 15 and 6 mSv, cumulative dose at interventional reference point: 650 and 1500 mGy, fluoroscopy time: 6.5, 15.5 and 21 min and cine frames: 700 and 1000 images, respectively. Because equipment performance and set-up are the factors contributing to patient dose variability, entrance surface air kerma for fluoroscopy, 13 mGy min−1, and image acquisition, 0.10 mGy per frame, have also been proposed in the set of RLs.
Background There is lack of guidance on specific CT protocols for imaging patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Purpose To assess international variations in CT utilization, ...
18 February 2008 in Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Patient doses for a few common fluoroscopy-guided procedures in interventional radiology (IR) (excluding cardiology) were collected from a few radiological departments in 13 European countries. The major aim was to evaluate patient doses for the basis of the reference levels. In total, data for 20 procedures for about 1300 patients were collected. There were many-fold variations in the number of IR equipment and procedures per population, in the entrance dose rates, and in the patient dose data (total dose area product or DAP, fluoroscopy time and number of frames). There was no clear correlation between the total DAP and entrance dose rate, or between the total DAP and fluoroscopy time, indicating that a number of parameters affect the differences. Because of the limited number of patients, preliminary reference levels were proposed only for a few procedures. There is a need to improve the optimisation of IR procedures and their definitions and grouping, in order to account for their different complexities.