Michael Rosemann

Michael Rosemann

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Michael Rosemann

Queensland University of Technology

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2018 in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJan Mendling
Jan Mendling
IWIngo Weber
Ingo Weber
Wil M.P. van der AalstWil M.P. van der Aalst
Wil M.P. van der Aalst
JBJan Vom Brocke
Jan Vom Brocke
CCCristina Cabanillas
Cristina Cabanillas
LZLiming Zhu
Liming Zhu
Blockchain technology offers a sizable promise to rethink the way interorganizational business processes are managed because of its potential to realize execution without a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). To stimulate research on this promise and the limits thereof, in this article, we outline the challenges and opportunities of blockchain for business process management (BPM). We first reflect how blockchains could be used in the context of the established BPM lifecycle and second how they might become relevant beyond. We conclude our discourse with a summary of seven research directions for investigating the application of blockchain technology in the context of BPM.

1 August 2000 in Information Systems Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHelmut Klaus
Helmut Klaus
MRMichael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann
GGGuy G. Gable
Guy G. Gable

1 March 2007 in Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRM. Rosemann
M. Rosemann
Wil M.P. van der AalstWil M.P. van der Aalst
Wil M.P. van der Aalst

1 March 2008 in MIS Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann
IVIris Vessey
Iris Vessey
This paper takes a first step in aiding researchers to improve the relevance of their research to practice. By proposing that Information Systems researchers conduct applicability checks with practitioners on the research objects (for example, theories, models, frameworks, processes, technical artifacts, or other theoretically based IS artifacts) they either produce or use in theory-focused research, our paper presents an actionable, systematic approach to evaluating, establishing, and further improving research relevance. Furthermore, because it is an approach that can be conducted as an additional step either at the beginning or the end of the traditional research life cycle, it leaves untouched the rigorous methods used to conduct the study, that is, it does not compromise traditional research models. The approach we propose is based on the analyses of three dimensions of relevance that are critical to practitioners’ attempts to internalize IS research findings (importance, accessibility, and suitability), and a comprehensive set of solutions that can be used to address them. Our analysis reveals that the most critical dimension for practice is the importance of the research to the needs of practice. The solution we propose to address that need is to conduct an applicability check on the research objects of interest. The applicability check forms an integral part of the research process, either prior to or following engagement in a typical research process. We present principles and criteria for the conduct and evaluation of an applicability check, which is primarily based on the focus group method, and secondarily on a modified nominal group technique.

11 April 2014
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
MRMichael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann
JBJan Vom Brocke
Jan Vom Brocke

1 September 2006 in Data & Knowledge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIslay Davies
Islay Davies
PGPeter Green
Peter Green
MRMichael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann
MIMarta Indulska
Marta Indulska
SGStan Gallo
Stan Gallo