To determine the strength of evidence for preoperative statin use for prevention of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. After literature search in major databases, 19 studies were identified [three RCT (randomized prospective clinical trials), 16 observational] that reported outcomes of 31 725 cardiac surgery patients with (n = 17 201; 54%) or without (n = 14 524; 46%) preoperative statin therapy. Outcomes that were analysed included early all-cause mortality (30-day mortality), myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and renal failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were reported using fixed or random effect models and publication bias was assessed. Preoperative statin therapy resulted in a 1.5% absolute risk reduction (2.2 vs. 3.7%; P < 0.0001) and 43% odds reduction for early all-cause mortality (OR 0.57; 95%CI: 0.49–0.67). A significant reduction (P < 0.01) in statin pretreated patients was also observed for AF (24.9 vs. 29.3%; OR 0.67, 95%CI: 0.51–0.88), stroke (2.1 vs. 2.9%, OR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.60–0.91), but not for MI (OR 1.11; 95%CI: 0.93–1.33) or renal failure (OR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.46–1.31). Funnel plot and Egger’s regression analysis (P = 0.60) excluded relevant publication bias. Our meta-analysis provides evidence that preoperative statin therapy exerts substantial clinical benefit on early postoperative adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery patients, but underscores the need for RCT trials.

Nutrition support is a necessary therapy for critically ill cardiac surgery patients. However, conclusive evidence for this population, consisting of well-conducted clinical trials is lacking. To clarify optimal strategies to improve outcomes, an international multidisciplinary group of 25 experts from different clinical specialties from Germany, Canada, Greece, USA and Russia discussed potential approaches to identify patients who may benefit from nutrition support, when best to initiate nutrition support, and the potential use of pharmaco-nutrition to modulate the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Despite conspicuous knowledge and evidence gaps, a rational nutritional support therapy is presented to benefit patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

In the present systematic review with meta-analysis, we sought to determine the current strength of evidence for or against off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with regard to hard clinical end-points, graft patency and cost-effectiveness. We performed a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials (RCT) which reported at least one of the desired end-points including: (i) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (ii) all-cause mortality, (iii) myocardial infarction, (iv) cerebrovascular accident, (v) repeat revascularization, (vi) graft patency and (vii) cost-effectiveness. The pooled treatment effects [odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs)] were assessed using a fixed or random effects model. A total of 16 904 patients from 51 studies were identified after literature search of the major databases using a predefined keyword list. The incidence of MACCE did not differ between the groups, neither during the first 30 days (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.04) nor for the longest available follow-up (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.92–1.12). While the incidence of mid-term graft failure (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09–1.72) and the need for repeat revascularization (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.33–1.80) was increased after off-pump surgery, on-pump surgery was associated with an increased occurrence of stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58–0.95), renal impairment (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.71–0.89) and mediastinitis (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31–0.62). There was no difference with regard to hard clinical end-points between on- or off-pump surgery, including myocardial infarction or mortality. The present systematic review emphasizes that both off- and on-pump surgery provide excellent and comparable results in patients requiring surgical revascularization. The choice for either strategy should take into account the individual patient profile (comorbidities, life expectancy, etc.) and importantly, the surgeon's experience in performing on- or off-pump CABG in their routine practice.

This paper describes the anatomic spiral arrangement of the cardiac interventricular septum that results in a twisting action that contributes to the forceful ejection of blood from both ventricles during systole. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction seen in various clinical settings is discussed with reference to the septum and its mechanism of function. The role of the septum in the interdependence of ventricular function is described. The structure/function relationships of the septum are related to maintenance of its oblique fiber orientation and midline configuration; disruption of this spatial relationship is the lynchpin of the concept that 'left heart failure begets right heart failure.' The importance of recognizing how alterations in septal anatomy affect biventricular performance is related to improved understanding of the clinical manifestations of septal dysfunction, designing a management scheme, and determining how to prevent septal injury.