Mohamed S. Hassanane

Mohamed S. Hassanane

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Mohamed S. Hassanane

Cell biology Department, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2011 in Molecular Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARachele Antonacci
Rachele Antonacci
MMMicaela Mineccia
Micaela Mineccia
Marie-Paule LefrancMarie-Paule Lefranc
Marie-Paule Lefranc
HAHassan M.E. Ashmaoui
Hassan M.E. Ashmaoui
CLCecilia Lanave
Cecilia Lanave
SCSalvatrice Ciccarese
Salvatrice Ciccarese

31 August 2001 in Livestock Production Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMB. Moioli
B. Moioli
AGA. Georgoudis
A. Georgoudis
FNF. Napolitano
F. Napolitano
GCG. Catillo
G. Catillo
EGE. Giubilei
E. Giubilei
MHM. Hassanane
M. Hassanane

1 November 2017 in Developmental & Comparative Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARachele Antonacci
Rachele Antonacci
MBMariagrazia Bellini
Mariagrazia Bellini
APAngela Pala
Angela Pala
MMMicaela Mineccia
Micaela Mineccia
MHMohamed S. Hassanane
Mohamed S. Hassanane
SMSerafina Massari
Serafina Massari

1 January 2001 in Reproduction Nutrition Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAida El makawy
Aida El makawy
MHMohamed S. Hassanane
Mohamed S. Hassanane
EAEl-Sayed A.M. Abd Alla
El-Sayed A.M. Abd Alla
Reproduction Nutrition Development, formerly Annales de Biologie Animale Biochimie Biophysique

7 September 2012 in European Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GVGiovanna Vaccarelli
Giovanna Vaccarelli
RARachele Antonacci
Rachele Antonacci
GTGianluca Tasco
Gianluca Tasco
FYFengtang Yang
Fengtang Yang
LGLuca Giordano
Luca Giordano
SCSalvatrice Ciccarese
Salvatrice Ciccarese
In jawed vertebrates theV‐(D)‐Jrearrangement is the main mechanism generating limitless variations of antigen‐specific receptors, immunoglobulins (IGs), andT‐cell receptors (TCRs) from few genes. Once the initial diversity is established in primary lymphoid organs, further diversification occurs inIGs by somatic hypermutation, a mechanism from which rearrangedTCRgenes were thought to be excluded. Here, we report the locus organization and expression of theT‐cell receptor gamma (TCRG) genes in theArabian camel (Camelus dromedarius). Expression data provide evidence that dromedary utilizes only twoTCRG V‐Jgenomic arrangements and, as expected,CDR3 contributes the major variability in theVdomain. The data also suggest that diversity might be generated by mutation in the productively rearrangedTCRGVgenes. As forIGgenes, the mutational target is biased towardGandCbases and (A/G/T)G(C/T)(A/T) motif (orDGYW). The replacement and synonymous substitutions (R/S) ratios inTCRGVregions are higher forCDRthan for framework region, thus suggesting selection toward amino acid changes inCDR. Using the counterpart humanTCRγδ receptor as a template, structural models computed adopting a comparative procedure show that nonconservative mutations contribute to diversity inCDR2 and at the γδVdomain interface.

15 November 2011 in Drug and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMohamed S. Hassanane
Mohamed S. Hassanane
NHNaglaa Hafiz
Naglaa Hafiz
WRWalaa Radwan
Walaa Radwan
AEAkmal A. El-Ghor
Akmal A. El-Ghor
Tryptizol® [amitriptyline HCl (AT); El-Kahira Pharmacological and Chemical Co., Cairo, Egypt], a widely used antidepressant drug in Egypt, was evaluated for its genotoxicity. The evaluation was performed in somatic (bone marrow) and germ (spermatocytes) cells, as well as well as the sperm morphology (i.e., head and tail) and count of the resulting sperm. Three doses were tested (low, medium, and high); they were chosen according to the drug manufacturer. The low-dose group received orally 1 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) daily for a total period of 1 month; the medium-dose group received 1 mg/kg b.w. daily for 15 days and 2 mg/kg b.w. daily for another 15 days; and the high-dose group received 1 mg/kg b.w. daily for 10 days, then 2 mg/kg b.w. daily for another 10 days and, finally, 4 mg/kg b.w. daily for 10 more days. The results showed that AT treatment induced structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities in somatic cells (bone marrow) and germ cells (spermatocytes). Moreover, AT significantly reduced both the mitotic index and meiotic activity after the different treatments used. AT was found to increase significantly the incidence of sperm-cell head and tail abnormalities. The sperm-cell count was also significantly decreased with the 3 doses tested. In general, results of chromosome abnormalities in both somatic and germ cells as well as sperm morphology and count showed that the effect of AT was dose dependent. The results of the current study showed that AT is a genotoxic agent for both somatic and germ cells and should be taken under special precautions and medical supervision.