Owen Randlett

Owen Randlett

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Owen Randlett

Laboratoire MeLiS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - CNRS UMR5284 - Inserm U1314, Institut NeuroMyoGène, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, Lyon, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2015 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROwen Randlett
Owen Randlett
CWCaroline Wee
Caroline Wee
ENEva A Naumann
Eva A Naumann
ONOnyeka Nnaemeka
Onyeka Nnaemeka
DSDavid Schoppik
David Schoppik
ASAlexander F Schier
Alexander F Schier
Z-Brain is an atlas of the larval zebrafish brain. It can be combined with pERK-based neural-activity measurements from freely behaving zebrafish to identify brain regions involved in generating behavior. In order to localize the neural circuits involved in generating behaviors, it is necessary to assign activity onto anatomical maps of the nervous system. Using brain registration across hundreds of larval zebrafish, we have built an expandable open-source atlas containing molecular labels and definitions of anatomical regions, the Z-Brain. Using this platform and immunohistochemical detection of phosphorylated extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) as a readout of neural activity, we have developed a system to create and contextualize whole-brain maps of stimulus- and behavior-dependent neural activity. This mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP)-mapping assay is technically simple, and data analysis is completely automated. Because MAP-mapping is performed on freely swimming fish, it is applicable to studies of nearly any stimulus or behavior. Here we demonstrate our high-throughput approach using pharmacological, visual and noxious stimuli, as well as hunting and feeding. The resultant maps outline hundreds of areas associated with behaviors.

22 March 2016 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TDTimothy W Dunn
Timothy W Dunn
YMYu Mu
Yu Mu
SNSujatha Narayan
Sujatha Narayan
OROwen Randlett
Owen Randlett
ENEva A Naumann
Eva A Naumann
MAMisha B Ahrens
Misha B Ahrens
In the absence of salient sensory cues to guide behavior, animals must still execute sequences of motor actions in order to forage and explore. How such successive motor actions are coordinated to form global locomotion trajectories is unknown. We mapped the structure of larval zebrafish swim trajectories in homogeneous environments and found that trajectories were characterized by alternating sequences of repeated turns to the left and to the right. Using whole-brain light-sheet imaging, we identified activity relating to the behavior in specific neural populations that we termed the anterior rhombencephalic turning region (ARTR). ARTR perturbations biased swim direction and reduced the dependence of turn direction on turn history, indicating that the ARTR is part of a network generating the temporal correlations in turn direction. We also find suggestive evidence for ARTR mutual inhibition and ARTR projections to premotor neurons. Finally, simulations suggest the observed turn sequences may underlie efficient exploration of local environments.

1 July 2012 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMichalis Agathocleous
Michalis Agathocleous
NLNicola K. Love
Nicola K. Love
OROwen Randlett
Owen Randlett
JHJulia J. Harris
Julia J. Harris
JLJinyue Liu
Jinyue Liu
WHWilliam A. Harris
William A. Harris
It is unclear whether proliferating and differentiating cells produce energy through different metabolic pathways. Harris and colleagues show, in the embryonic Xenopus retina, that dividing progenitors use glycogen for glycolysis, and that a transition to oxidative phosphorylation occurs as cells differentiate. Unlike healthy adult tissues, cancers produce energy mainly by aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation1. This adaptation, called the Warburg effect, may be a feature of all dividing cells, both normal and cancerous2, or it may be specific to cancers3. It is not known whether, in a normally growing tissue during development, proliferating and postmitotic cells produce energy in fundamentally different ways. Here we show in the embryonic Xenopus retina in vivo, that dividing progenitor cells depend less on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production than non-dividing differentiated cells, and instead use glycogen to fuel aerobic glycolysis. The transition from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation is connected to the cell differentiation process. Glycolysis is indispensable for progenitor proliferation and biosynthesis, even when it is not used for ATP production. These results suggest that the Warburg effect can be a feature of normal proliferation in vivo, and that the regulation of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation is critical for normal development.

1 April 2011 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OROwen Randlett
Owen Randlett
LPLucia Poggi
Lucia Poggi
Flavio R ZolessiFlavio R Zolessi
Flavio R Zolessi
WHWilliam A. Harris
William A. Harris
How the site of axon emergence is specified during neural development is not understood. Previous studies disagree on the relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. The axons of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) emerge basally in vivo, yet because RGCs develop from polarized neuroepithelial cells within a polarized environment, disentangling intrinsic and extrinsic influences is a challenge. We use time-lapse imaging to demonstrate that Laminin acting directly on RGCs is necessary and sufficient to orient axon emergence in vivo. Laminin contact with the basal processes of newborn RGCs prevents the cells from entering a stochastic Stage 2 phase, directs the rapid accumulation of the early axonal marker Kif5c560-YFP, and leads to the formation of axonal growth cones. These results suggest that contact-mediated cues may be critical for the site of axon emergence and account for the differences in cellular behavior observed in vitro and in vivo.

1 June 2015 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlix M.B. Lacoste
Alix M.B. Lacoste
DSDavid Schoppik
David Schoppik
DRDrew N. Robson
Drew N. Robson
MHMartin Haesemeyer
Martin Haesemeyer
RPRuben Portugues
Ruben Portugues
ASAlexander F. Schier
Alexander F. Schier

1 April 2019 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OROwen Randlett
Owen Randlett
MHMartin Haesemeyer
Martin Haesemeyer
GFGreg Forkin
Greg Forkin
HSHannah Shoenhard
Hannah Shoenhard
ASAlexander F. Schier
Alexander F. Schier
MGMichael Granato
Michael Granato