Rochelle F. Andreotti

Rochelle F. Andreotti

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Rochelle F. Andreotti

Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University College of Medicine , Nashville, TN, 37232-2675

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RARochelle F. Andreotti
Rochelle F. Andreotti
DTDirk Timmerman
Dirk Timmerman
LSLori M. Strachowski
Lori M. Strachowski
WFWouter Froyman
Wouter Froyman
BBBeryl R. Benacerraf
Beryl R. Benacerraf
PGPhyllis Glanc
Phyllis Glanc
The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US risk stratification and management system for evaluation of ovarian and other adnexal masses is based on a standardized lexicon, incorporates all cl... The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US risk stratification and management system is designed to provide consistent interpretations, to decrease or eliminate ambiguity in US repor...

1 October 2018 in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARochelle F. Andreotti
Rochelle F. Andreotti
DTDirk Timmerman
Dirk Timmerman
BBBeryl R. Benacerraf
Beryl R. Benacerraf
GBGenevieve L. Bennett
Genevieve L. Bennett
TBTom Bourne
Tom Bourne
PGPhyllis Glanc
Phyllis Glanc

1 January 2008 in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLibby L. Shadinger
Libby L. Shadinger
RARochelle F. Andreotti
Rochelle F. Andreotti
RKRachel L. Kurian
Rachel L. Kurian
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the most closely associated sonographic and clinical characteristics of ovarian torsion. Methods The medical records and sonographic studies of 39 patients with pathologically proven ovarian torsion diagnosed at our institution from July 1, 2000, through December 31, 2005, were retrospectively reviewed. The volumes of the affected ovaries and ovary/mass complexes were compared with an age‐appropriate standard. Statistical significance of the data was assessed by a likelihood ratio χ2 analysis. Results All patients (100%) had a chief symptom of abdominal pain. Thirty‐three (85%) reported vomiting; 22 (56%) had leukocytosis; and 7 (18%) had a documented elevated temperature. All affected ovaries and ovary/mass complexes were enlarged. Twenty‐one (54%) had arterial flow on Doppler interrogation, and 18 (46%) had no arterial flow. Thirteen (33%) had venous flow, and 26 (67%) had no venous flow. Differences in the arterial and venous flow patterns between the premenarchal and reproductive age groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions Abdominal pain, vomiting, ovarian enlargement, and absence of ovarian venous Doppler flow are the most frequently shown clinical and sonographic indicators of ovarian torsion. However, ovarian enlargement, even in the presence of arterial and venous Doppler flow, is the most commonly associated sonographic finding. Suspicion of ovarian torsion should be high in the setting of clinical symptoms and ovarian enlargement regardless of the presence or absence of an ovarian Doppler signal.

1 September 2023 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLori M. Strachowski
Lori M. Strachowski
PJPriyanka Jha
Priyanka Jha
CPCatherine H. Phillips
Catherine H. Phillips
MPMisty M. Blanchette Porter
Misty M. Blanchette Porter
WFWouter Froyman
Wouter Froyman
RARochelle F. Andreotti
Rochelle F. Andreotti
First published in 2019, the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) US provides a standardized lexicon for ovarian and adnexal lesions, enables stratification of these lesions with use of a numeric score based on morphologic features to indicate the risk of malignancy, and offers management guidance. This risk stratification system has subsequently been validated in retrospective studies and has yielded good interreader concordance, even with users of different levels of expertise. As use of the system increased, it was recognized that an update was needed to address certain clinical challenges, clarify recommendations, and incorporate emerging data from validation studies. Additional morphologic features that favor benignity, such as the bilocular feature for cysts without solid components and shadowing for solid lesions with smooth contours, were added to O-RADS US for optimal risk-appropriate scoring. As O-RADS US 4 has been shown to be an appropriate cutoff for malignancy, it is now recommended that lower-risk O-RADS US 3 lesions be followed with US if not excised. For solid lesions and cystic lesions with solid components, further characterization with MRI is now emphasized as a supplemental evaluation method, as MRI may provide higher specificity. This statement summarizes the updates to the governing concepts, lexicon terminology and assessment categories, and management recommendations found in the 2022 version of O-RADS US.

1 November 2019 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDeborah Levine
Deborah Levine
MPMaitray D. Patel
Maitray D. Patel
ESElizabeth Suh-Burgmann
Elizabeth Suh-Burgmann
RARochelle F. Andreotti
Rochelle F. Andreotti
BBBeryl R. Benacerraf
Beryl R. Benacerraf
DBDouglas L. Brown
Douglas L. Brown
In postmenopausal women, simple cysts greater than 1 cm in size should be described but do not need follow-up imaging unless they are greater than 3–5 cm, using the higher threshold for exceptional... This multidisciplinary consensus update aligns prior Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) guidelines on simple adnexal cysts with recent large studies showing exceptionally low risk of cance...

1 August 2024 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRShuchi K. Rodgers
Shuchi K. Rodgers
MHMindy M. Horrow
Mindy M. Horrow
PDPeter M. Doubilet
Peter M. Doubilet
MFMary C. Frates
Mary C. Frates
AKAnne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy
LSLori M. Strachowski
Lori M. Strachowski
The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound First-Trimester US Lexicon recommends well-defined, scientific, and specific terminology to communicate clearly across disciplines, minimize bias and harm, and respect patient preferences.