Gwenaël Vourc’h

Gwenaël Vourc’h

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gwenaël Vourc’h

EPIA, INRA, F-63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 October 2015 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EVElise Vaumourin
Elise Vaumourin
GVGwenaël Vourc’h
Gwenaël Vourc’h
PGPatrick Gasqui
Patrick Gasqui
MVMuriel Vayssier-Taussat
Muriel Vayssier-Taussat
Most parasites co-occur with other parasites, although the importance of such multiparasitism has only recently been recognised. Co-infections may result when hosts are independently infected by different parasites at the same time or when interactions among parasite species facilitate co-occurrence. Such interactions can have important repercussions on human or animal health because they can alter host susceptibility, infection duration, transmission risks, and clinical symptoms. These interactions may be synergistic or antagonistic and thus produce diverse effects in infected humans and animals. Interactions among parasites strongly influence parasite dynamics and therefore play a major role in structuring parasite populations (both within and among hosts) as well as host populations. However, several methodological challenges remain when it comes to detecting parasite interactions. The goal of this review is to summarise current knowledge on the causes and consequences of multiparasitism and to discuss the different methods and tools that researchers have developed to study the factors that lead to multiparasitism. It also identifies new research directions to pursue.

1 October 2016 in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LVLaurence Vial
Laurence Vial
FSFrédéric Stachurski
Frédéric Stachurski
ALAgnes Leblond
Agnes Leblond
KHKarine Huber
Karine Huber
GVGwenaël Vourc’h
Gwenaël Vourc’h
Agustin Estrada-PeñaAgustin Estrada-Peña
Agustin Estrada-Peña

16 September 2014 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDThibaud Dugat
Thibaud Dugat
ACAmélie Chastagner
Amélie Chastagner
ALAnne-Claire Lagrée
Anne-Claire Lagrée
EPElisabeth Petit
Elisabeth Petit
BDBenoît Durand
Benoît Durand
NHNadia Haddad
Nadia Haddad
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a tick-borne intragranulocytic alpha-proteobacterium. It is the causative agent of tick-borne fever in ruminants, and of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans, two diseases which are becoming increasingly recognized in Europe and the USA. However, while several molecular typing tools have been developed over the last years, few of them are appropriate for in-depth exploration of the epidemiological cycle of this bacterium. Therefore we have developed a Multiple-Locus Variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) Analysis typing technique for A. phagocytophilum. Five VNTRs were selected based on the HZ human-derived strain genome, and were tested on the Webster human-derived strain and on 123 DNA samples: 67 from cattle, 7 from sheep, 15 from roe deer, 4 from red deer, 1 from a reindeer, 2 from horses, 1 from a dog, and 26 from ticks. From these samples, we obtained 84 different profiles, with a diversity index of 0.96 (0.99 for vertebrate samples, i.e. without tick samples). Our technique confirmed that A. phagocytophilum from roe deer or domestic ruminants belong to two different clusters, while A. phagocytophilum from red deer and domestic ruminants locate within the same cluster, questioning the respective roles of roe vs red deer as reservoir hosts for domestic ruminant strains in Europe. As expected, greater diversity was obtained between rather than within cattle herds. Our technique has great potential to provide detailed information on A. phagocytophilum isolates, improving both epidemiological and phylogenic investigations, thereby helping in the development of relevant prevention and control measures.

22 August 2015 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELElsa Léger
Elsa Léger
XLXiangye Liu
Xiangye Liu
SMSébastien Masseglia
Sébastien Masseglia
VNValérie Noël
Valérie Noël
GVGwenaël Vourc’h
Gwenaël Vourc’h
KMKaren D. McCoy
Karen D. McCoy
Reliable information on host use by arthropod vectors is required to study pathogen transmission ecology and to predict disease risk. Direct observation of host use is often difficult or impossible and indirect methods are therefore necessary. However, the reliability of currently available methods to identify the last host of blood-feeding arthropods has not been evaluated, and may be particularly problematic for ticks because host blood has been digested at capture. Biases in host detection may lead to erroneous conclusions on both vector ecology and pathogen circulation. Here, we experimentally tested for biases in host detection using the generalist three-host tick Ixodes ricinus as a model system. We fed ticks using an artificial feeding system and amplified blood meal traces post-moult (i.e., in the succeeding unfed life stage) via both a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and a reverse line blotting method. We then experimentally tested for three types of biases in host detection: 1) time post-moult, 2) tick life stage and 3) host type (non-nucleated mammal blood versus nucleated avian blood), and compared these biases between the two molecular methods. Our results show that all three factors can influence host detection in ticks but not necessarily in the expected way. Although host detection rates decreased with time post-moult, mammal blood tended to be more readily detected than bird blood. Tick life stage was also an important factor; detection was higher in nymphs than in adults and, in some cases, remnants from both larval and nymphal blood meals could be detected in the adult stage. These biases were similar for the two detection techniques. We show that different factors associated with questing ticks may influence our ability to correctly infer previous host use and that these factors may bias inferences from field-based studies. As these biases may be common to other vector-borne disease systems, their implications for our understanding of vector ecology and disease transmission require more explicit consideration.