Victor Gray

Victor Gray

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Victor Gray

Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, U.K.

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2014 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
DDDamir Dzebo
Damir Dzebo
MAMaria Abrahamsson
Maria Abrahamsson
BABo Albinsson
Bo Albinsson
KMKasper Moth-Poulsen
Kasper Moth-Poulsen
This perspective discusses recent progress in photon upconversion systems and devices for solar energy applications.

1 May 2018 in Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
KMKasper Moth-Poulsen
Kasper Moth-Poulsen
BABo Albinsson
Bo Albinsson
MAMaria Abrahamsson
Maria Abrahamsson

21 September 2015 in Journal of Materials Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
DDDamir Dzebo
Damir Dzebo
ALAngelica Lundin
Angelica Lundin
JAJonathan Alborzpour
Jonathan Alborzpour
MAMaria Abrahamsson
Maria Abrahamsson
KMKasper Moth-Poulsen
Kasper Moth-Poulsen
Molecules based on anthracene are commonly used in applications such as OLEDs and triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. In future design of blue emitting materials it is useful to know which part of the molecule can be altered in order to obtain new physical properties without losing the inherent optical properties. We have studied the effect of substitution of 9,10-substituted anthracenes. Eight anthracenes with aromatic phenyl and thiophene substituents were synthesised, containing both electron donating and accepting groups. The substitutions were found to affect the UV/Vis absorption only to a small extent, however the fluorescence properties were more affected with the thiophene substituents that decreased the fluorescence quantum yield from unity to <10%. DFT calculations confirm the minor change in absorption and indicate that the first and second triplet state energies are also unaffected. Finally the three most fluorescent derivatives 4-(10-phenylanthracene-9-yl)pyridine, 9-phenyl-10-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)anthracene and 4-(10-phenylanthracene-9-yl)benzonitrile were successfully utilized as annihilators in a triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA-UC) system employing platinum octaethylporphyrin as the sensitizer. The observed upconversion quantum yields, ϕUC, slightly exceeded that of the benchmark annihilator 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA).

2 November 2022 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAndrew J. Carrod
Andrew J. Carrod
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
KBKarl Börjesson
Karl Börjesson
Here we consolidate recent advances in the fields of triplet–triplet annihilation photon upconversion and singlet fission. We further describe their utility in increasing the efficiency of photovoltaic devices.

5 April 2017 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
ADAmbra Dreos
Ambra Dreos
PEPaul Erhart
Paul Erhart
BABo Albinsson
Bo Albinsson
KMKasper Moth-Poulsen
Kasper Moth-Poulsen
MAMaria Abrahamsson
Maria Abrahamsson
Triplet–triplet annihilation photon upconversion (TTA-UC) can, through a number of energy transfer processes, efficiently combine two low frequency photons into one photon of higher frequency. TTA-UC systems consist of one absorbing species (the sensitizer) and one emitting species (the annihilator). Herein, we show that the structurally similar annihilators, 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA, 1), 9-(4-phenylethynyl)-10-phenylanthracene (2) and 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene (BPEA, 3) have very different upconversion efficiencies, 15.2 ± 2.8%, 15.9 ± 1.3% and 1.6 ± 0.8%, respectively (of a maximum of 50%). We show that these results can be understood in terms of a loss channel, previously unaccounted for, originating from the difference between the BPEA singlet and triplet surface shapes. The difference between the two surfaces results in a fraction of the triplet state population having geometries not energetically capable of forming the first singlet excited state. This is supported by TD-DFT calculations of the annihilator excited state surfaces as a function of phenyl group rotation. We thereby highlight that the commonly used “spin-statistical factor” should be used with caution when explaining TTA-efficiencies. Furthermore, we show that the precious metal free zinc octaethylporphyrin (ZnOEP) can be used for efficient sensitization and that the upconversion quantum yield is maximized when sensitizer–annihilator spectral overlap is minimized (ZnOEP with 2).

31 May 2017 in Chemical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VGVictor Gray
Victor Gray
PXPan Xia
Pan Xia
ZHZhiyuan Huang
Zhiyuan Huang
EMEmily Moses
Emily Moses
AFAlexander Fast
Alexander Fast
MTMing Lee Tang
Ming Lee Tang
Herein we report the first example of nanocrystal (NC) sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation based photon upconversion from the visible to ultraviolet (vis-to-UV). Many photocatalyzed reactions, such as water splitting, require UV photons in order to function efficiently. Upconversion is one possible means of extending the usable range of photons into the visible. Vis-to-UV upconversion is achieved with CdS/ZnS core–shell NCs as the sensitizer and 2,5-diphenyloxazole (PPO) as annihilator and emitter. The ZnS shell was crucial in order to achieve any appreciable upconversion. From time resolved photoluminescence and transient absorption measurements we conclude that the ZnS shell affects the NC and triplet energy transfer (TET) from NC to PPO in two distinct ways. Upon ZnS growth the surface traps are passivated thus increasing the TET. The shell, however, also acts as a tunneling barrier for TET, reducing the efficiency. This leads to an optimal shell thickness where the upconversion quantum yield (Φ′UC) is maximized. Here the maximum Φ′UC was determined to be 5.2 ± 0.5% for 4 monolayers of ZnS shell on CdS NCs.