Wilco Hazeleger

Wilco Hazeleger

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Wilco Hazeleger

Utrecht University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 November 2016 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHReindert J. Haarsma
Reindert J. Haarsma
MRMalcolm J. Roberts
Malcolm J. Roberts
PVPier Luigi Vidale
Pier Luigi Vidale
CSCatherine A. Senior
Catherine A. Senior
ABAlessio Bellucci
Alessio Bellucci
JSJin-Song von Storch
Jin-Song von Storch
Robust projections and predictions of climate variability and change, particularly at regional scales, rely on the driving processes being represented with fidelity in model simulations. The role of enhanced horizontal resolution in improved process representation in all components of the climate system is of growing interest, particularly as some recent simulations suggest both the possibility of significant changes in large-scale aspects of circulation as well as improvements in small-scale processes and extremes. However, such high-resolution global simulations at climate timescales, with resolutions of at least 50 km in the atmosphere and 0.25° in the ocean, have been performed at relatively few research centres and generally without overall coordination, primarily due to their computational cost. Assessing the robustness of the response of simulated climate to model resolution requires a large multi-model ensemble using a coordinated set of experiments. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) is the ideal framework within which to conduct such a study, due to the strong link to models being developed for the CMIP DECK experiments and other model intercomparison projects (MIPs). Increases in high-performance computing (HPC) resources, as well as the revised experimental design for CMIP6, now enable a detailed investigation of the impact of increased resolution up to synoptic weather scales on the simulated mean climate and its variability. The High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) presented in this paper applies, for the first time, a multi-model approach to the systematic investigation of the impact of horizontal resolution. A coordinated set of experiments has been designed to assess both a standard and an enhanced horizontal-resolution simulation in the atmosphere and ocean. The set of HighResMIP experiments is divided into three tiers consisting of atmosphere-only and coupled runs and spanning the period 1950–2050, with the possibility of extending to 2100, together with some additional targeted experiments. This paper describes the experimental set-up of HighResMIP, the analysis plan, the connection with the other CMIP6 endorsed MIPs, as well as the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations. HighResMIP thereby focuses on one of the CMIP6 broad questions, “what are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases?”, but we also discuss how it addresses the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) grand challenges.

1 January 2009 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGStephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies
ABArne Biastoch
Arne Biastoch
CBClaus Böning
Claus Böning
FBFrank Bryan
Frank Bryan
GDGokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu
JYJianjun Yin
Jianjun Yin

7 December 2011 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WHW. Hazeleger
W. Hazeleger
XWX. Wang
X. Wang
CSC. Severijns
C. Severijns
SŞS. Ştefănescu
S. Ştefănescu
RBR. Bintanja
R. Bintanja
KWK. van der Wiel
K. van der Wiel

1 October 2010 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WHWilco Hazeleger
Wilco Hazeleger
CSCamiel Severijns
Camiel Severijns
TSTido Semmler
Tido Semmler
SŞSimona Ştefănescu
Simona Ştefănescu
SYShuting Yang
Shuting Yang
UWUlrika Willén
Ulrika Willén
International audienceno abstrac

1 February 2021 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPeter Bauer
Peter Bauer
BSBjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens
WHWilco Hazeleger
Wilco Hazeleger

17 February 2021 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJana Sillmann
Jana Sillmann
TSTheodore G. Shepherd
Theodore G. Shepherd
BHBart van den Hurk
Bart van den Hurk
WHWilco Hazeleger
Wilco Hazeleger
OMOlivia Martius
Olivia Martius
JZJakob Zscheischler
Jakob Zscheischler
The climate science community is challenged to adopt an actionable risk perspective, which is difficult to align with the traditional focus on model‐based probabilistic climate change projections. Event‐based storylines can provide a way out of this conundrum by putting emphasis on plausibility rather than probability. This links directly to common practices in disaster risk management using “stress‐testing” for emergency preparedness based on events that are conditional on specific and plausible assumptions. Event‐based storylines allow for conditional explanations, without full attribution of every causal factor, which is crucial when some aspects of the latter are complex and highly uncertain.