Mike Nalls

Mike Nalls

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Mike Nalls

Center for Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias, National Institute on Aging and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMike A Nalls
Mike A Nalls
CBCornelis Blauwendraat
Cornelis Blauwendraat
KHKarl Heilbron
Karl Heilbron
SBSara Bandres-Ciga
Sara Bandres-Ciga
DCDiana Chang
Diana Chang
FZFutao Zhang
Futao Zhang

28 December 2023 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJonggeol Jeffrey Kim
Jonggeol Jeffrey Kim
DVDan Vitale
Dan Vitale
DODiego Véliz Otani
Diego Véliz Otani
MLMichelle Mulan Lian
Michelle Mulan Lian
KHKarl Heilbron
Karl Heilbron
IMIgnacio Mata
Ignacio Mata
Although over 90 independent risk variants have been identified for Parkinson’s disease using genome-wide association studies, most studies have been performed in just one population at a time. Here we performed a large-scale multi-ancestry meta-analysis of Parkinson’s disease with 49,049 cases, 18,785 proxy cases and 2,458,063 controls including individuals of European, East Asian, Latin American and African ancestry. In a meta-analysis, we identified 78 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 12 potentially novel loci (MTF2, PIK3CA, ADD1, SYBU, IRS2, USP8, PIGL, FASN, MYLK2, USP25, EP300 and PPP6R2) and fine-mapped 6 putative causal variants at 6 known PD loci. By combining our results with publicly available eQTL data, we identified 25 putative risk genes in these novel loci whose expression is associated with PD risk. This work lays the groundwork for future efforts aimed at identifying PD loci in non-European populations.

30 April 2024 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJacob M. Keaton
Jacob M. Keaton
ZKZoha Kamali
Zoha Kamali
TXTian Xie
Tian Xie
AVAhmad Vaez
Ahmad Vaez
AWAriel Williams
Ariel Williams
Harold SniederHarold Snieder
Harold Snieder
Hypertension affects more than one billion people worldwide. Here we identify 113 novel loci, reporting a total of 2,103 independent genetic signals (P < 5 × 10−8) from the largest single-stage blood pressure (BP) genome-wide association study to date (n = 1,028,980 European individuals). These associations explain more than 60% of single nucleotide polymorphism-based BP heritability. Comparing top versus bottom deciles of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) reveals clinically meaningful differences in BP (16.9 mmHg systolic BP, 95% CI, 15.5–18.2 mmHg, P = 2.22 × 10−126) and more than a sevenfold higher odds of hypertension risk (odds ratio, 7.33; 95% CI, 5.54–9.70; P = 4.13 × 10−44) in an independent dataset. Adding PRS into hypertension-prediction models increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) from 0.791 (95% CI, 0.781–0.801) to 0.826 (95% CI, 0.817–0.836, ∆AUROC, 0.035, P = 1.98 × 10−34). We compare the 2,103 loci results in non-European ancestries and show significant PRS associations in a large African-American sample. Secondary analyses implicate 500 genes previously unreported for BP. Our study highlights the role of increasingly large genomic studies for precision health research.

1 April 2022 in npj Parkinson's Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMary B. Makarious
Mary B. Makarious
HLHampton L. Leonard
Hampton L. Leonard
DVDan Vitale
Dan Vitale
HIHirotaka Iwaki
Hirotaka Iwaki
LSLana Sargent
Lana Sargent
MNMike A. Nalls
Mike A. Nalls
Personalized medicine promises individualized disease prediction and treatment. The convergence of machine learning (ML) and available multimodal data is key moving forward. We build upon previous work to deliver multimodal predictions of Parkinson’s disease (PD) risk and systematically develop a model using GenoML, an automated ML package, to make improved multi-omic predictions of PD, validated in an external cohort. We investigated top features, constructed hypothesis-free disease-relevant networks, and investigated drug–gene interactions. We performed automated ML on multimodal data from the Parkinson’s progression marker initiative (PPMI). After selecting the best performing algorithm, all PPMI data was used to tune the selected model. The model was validated in the Parkinson’s Disease Biomarker Program (PDBP) dataset. Our initial model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 89.72% for the diagnosis of PD. The tuned model was then tested for validation on external data (PDBP, AUC 85.03%). Optimizing thresholds for classification increased the diagnosis prediction accuracy and other metrics. Finally, networks were built to identify gene communities specific to PD. Combining data modalities outperforms the single biomarker paradigm. UPSIT and PRS contributed most to the predictive power of the model, but the accuracy of these are supplemented by many smaller effect transcripts and risk SNPs. Our model is best suited to identifying large groups of individuals to monitor within a health registry or biobank to prioritize for further testing. This approach allows complex predictive models to be reproducible and accessible to the community, with the package, code, and results publicly available.

9 August 2018 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MNMike A. Nalls
Mike A. Nalls
CBCornelis Blauwendraat
Cornelis Blauwendraat
CVCostanza L. Vallerga
Costanza L. Vallerga
KHKarl Heilbron
Karl Heilbron
SBSara Bandres-Ciga
Sara Bandres-Ciga
FCfor the International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium
for the International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium
We performed the largest genome-wide association study of PD to date, involving the analysis of 7.8M SNPs in 37.7K cases, 18.6K UK Biobank proxy-cases, and 1.4M controls. We identified 90 independent genome-wide significant signals across 78 loci, including 38 independent risk signals in 37 novel loci. These variants explained 26-36% of the heritable risk of PD. Tests of causality within a Mendelian randomization framework identified putatively causal genes for 70 risk signals. Tissue expression enrichment analysis suggested that signatures of PD loci were heavily brain-enriched, consistent with specific neuronal cell types being implicated from single cell expression data. We found significant genetic correlations with brain volumes, smoking status, and educational attainment. In sum, these data provide the most comprehensive understanding of the genetic architecture of PD to date by revealing many additional PD risk loci, providing a biological context for these risk factors, and demonstrating that a considerable genetic component of this disease remains unidentified.

29 November 2019 in Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLHampton Leonard
Hampton Leonard
CBCornelis Blauwendraat
Cornelis Blauwendraat
LKLynne Krohn
Lynne Krohn
FFFaraz Faghri
Faraz Faghri
HIHirotaka Iwaki
Hirotaka Iwaki
ZGZiv Gan-Or
Ziv Gan-Or
Background Classical randomisation of clinical trial patients creates a source of genetic variance that may be contributing to the high failure rate seen in neurodegenerative disease trials. Our objective was to quantify genetic difference between randomised trial arms and determine how imbalance can affect trial outcomes. Methods 5851 patients with Parkinson’s disease of European ancestry data and two simulated virtual cohorts based on public data were used. Data were resampled at different sizes for 1000 iterations and randomly assigned to the two arms of a simulated trial. False-negative and false-positive rates were estimated using simulated clinical trials, and per cent difference in genetic risk score (GRS) and allele frequency was calculated to quantify variance between arms. Results 5851 patients with Parkinson’s disease (mean (SD) age, 61.02 (12.61) years; 2095 women (35.81%)) as well as simulated patients from virtually created cohorts were used in the study. Approximately 90% of the iterations had at least one statistically significant difference in individual risk SNPs between each trial arm. Approximately 5%–6% of iterations had a statistically significant difference between trial arms in mean GRS. For significant iterations, the average per cent difference for mean GRS between trial arms was 130.87%, 95% CI 120.89 to 140.85 (n=200). Glucocerebrocidase (GBA) gene-only simulations see an average 18.86%, 95% CI 18.01 to 19.71 difference in GRS scores between trial arms (n=50). When adding a drug effect of −0.5 points in MDS-UPDRS per year at n=50, 33.9% of trials resulted in false negatives. Conclusions Our data support the hypothesis that within genetically unmatched clinical trials, genetic heterogeneity could confound true therapeutic effects as expected. Clinical trials should undergo pretrial genetic adjustment or, at the minimum, post-trial adjustment and analysis for failed trials.