Joachim Claudet

Joachim Claudet

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Joachim Claudet

CNRS, PSL-EPHE-UPVD, CRIOBE, Paris, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2008 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJoachim Claudet
Joachim Claudet
COCraig W. Osenberg
Craig W. Osenberg
LBLisandro Benedetti‐Cecchi
Lisandro Benedetti‐Cecchi
PDPaolo Domenici
Paolo Domenici
JGJosé‐Antonio García‐Charton
José‐Antonio García‐Charton
SPSerge Planes
Serge Planes

1 January 2015 in GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HEHilde Eggermont
Hilde Eggermont
EBEstelle Balian
Estelle Balian
JAJosé Azevedo
José Azevedo
VBVictor Beumer
Victor Beumer
TBTomas Brodin
Tomas Brodin
XRXavier Le Roux
Xavier Le Roux
Greening roofs or walls to cool down city areas during summer, to capture storm water, to abate pollution, and to increase human well-being while enhancing biodiversity: nature-based solutions (NBS) refer to the sustainable management and use of nature for tackling societal challenges. Building on and comple- menting traditional biodiversity conservation and management strategies, NBS integrate science, policy, and practice and create biodiversity benefits in terms of diverse, well-managed ecosystems.

10 September 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKirsten Grorud-Colvert
Kirsten Grorud-Colvert
JSJenna Sullivan-Stack
Jenna Sullivan-Stack
CRCallum Roberts
Callum Roberts
VCVanessa Constant
Vanessa Constant
BCBárbara Horta E Costa
Bárbara Horta E Costa
JLJane Lubchenco
Jane Lubchenco
Consistency in conservation: Marine protected areas (MPAs) are now well established globally as tools for conservation, for enhancing marine biodiversity, and for promoting sustainable fisheries. That said, which regions are labeled as MPAs varies substantially, from those that full protect marine species and prohibit human extraction to those that permit everything from intensive fishing to mining. This inconsistency can in some cases inhibit both conservation and quantifying the proportion of the marine environment that is truly protected. Grorud-Colvert et al . review the consistency of MPAs and propose a framework by which levels of protection can be evaluated and improved. —SNV

1 January 2020 in One Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJoachim Claudet
Joachim Claudet
LBLaurent Bopp
Laurent Bopp
WCWilliam W.L. Cheung
William W.L. Cheung
RDRodolphe Devillers
Rodolphe Devillers
EEElva Escobar-Briones
Elva Escobar-Briones
FGFrançoise Gaill
Françoise Gaill

23 October 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEleanor Sterling
Eleanor Sterling
CFChristopher Filardi
Christopher Filardi
ATAnne Toomey
Anne Toomey
ASAmanda Sigouin
Amanda Sigouin
EBErin Betley
Erin Betley
SJStacy D. Jupiter
Stacy D. Jupiter

1 April 2010 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJ. Claudet
J. Claudet
COC. W. Osenberg
C. W. Osenberg
PDP. Domenici
P. Domenici
Fabio BadalamentiFabio Badalamenti
Fabio Badalamenti
MMM. Milazzo
M. Milazzo
SPS. Planes
S. Planes
Marine reserves are assumed to protect a wide range of species from deleterious effects stemming from exploitation. However, some species, due to their ecological characteristics, may not respond positively to protection. Very little is known about the effects of life history and ecological traits (e.g., mobility, growth, and habitat) on responses of fish species to marine reserves. Using 40 data sets from 12 European marine reserves, we show that there is significant variation in the response of different species of fish to protection and that this heterogeneity can be explained, in part, by differences in their traits. Densities of targeted size‐classes of commercial species were greater in protected than unprotected areas. This effect of protection increased as the maximum body size of the targeted species increased, and it was greater for species that were not obligate schoolers. However, contrary to previous theoretical findings, even mobile species with wide home ranges benefited from protection: the effect of protection was at least as strong for mobile species as it was for sedentary ones. Noncommercial bycatch and unexploited species rarely responded to protection, and when they did (in the case of unexploited bentho‐pelagic species), they exhibited the opposite response: their densities were lower inside reserves. The use of marine reserves for marine conservation and fisheries management implies that they should ensure protection for a wide range of species with different life‐history and ecological traits. Our results suggest this is not the case, and instead that effects vary with economic value, body size, habitat, depth range, and schooling behavior.