Xiao Yan

Xiao Yan

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Xiao Yan

Institute for Math and AI, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZCZhenkun Cai
Zhenkun Cai
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
KMKaihao Ma
Kaihao Ma
YWYidi Wu
Yidi Wu
YHYuzhen Huang
Yuzhen Huang
FYFan Yu
Fan Yu
Effective parallelization strategies are crucial for the performance of distributed deep neural network (DNN) training. Recently, several methods have been proposed to search parallelization strategies but they all optimize a single objective (e.g., execution time, memory consumption) and produce only one strategy. We propose Frontier Tracking (FT), an efficient algorithm that finds a set of Pareto-optimal parallelization strategies to explore the best trade-off among different objectives. FT can minimize the memory consumption when the number of devices is limited and fully utilize additional resources to reduce the execution time. Based on FT , we develop a user-friendly system, called TensorOpt , which allows users to run their distributed DNN training jobs without caring the details about searching and coding parallelization strategies. Experimental results show that TensorOpt is more flexible in adapting to resource availability compared with existing frameworks.

9 March 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYidi Wu
Yidi Wu
KMKaihao Ma
Kaihao Ma
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
ZLZhi Liu
Zhi Liu
ZCZhenkun Cai
Zhenkun Cai
FYFan Yu
Fan Yu
We study how to support elasticity, that is, the ability to dynamically adjust the parallelism (i.e., the number of GPUs), for deep neural network (DNN) training in a GPU cluster. Elasticity can benefit multi-tenant GPU cluster management in many ways, for example, achieving various scheduling objectives (e.g., job throughput, job completion time, GPU efficiency) according to cluster load variations, utilizing transient idle resources, and supporting performance profiling, job migration, and straggler mitigation. We propose EDL, which enables elastic deep learning with a simple API and can be easily integrated with existing deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow and PyTorch. EDL also incorporates techniques that are necessary to reduce the overhead of parallelism adjustments, such as stop-free scaling and dynamic data pipeline. We demonstrate with experiments that EDL can indeed bring significant benefits to the above-listed applications in GPU cluster management.

13 May 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
WNWentao Ning
Wentao Ning
Reynold C.K. ChengReynold C.K. Cheng
Reynold C.K. Cheng
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
BKBen Kao
Ben Kao
NHNan Huo
Nan Huo
BTBo Tang
Bo Tang
Global popularity (GP) bias is the phenomenon that popular items are recommended much more frequently than they should be, which goes against the goal of providing personalized recommendations and harms user experience and recommendation accuracy. Many methods have been proposed to reduce GP bias but they fail to notice the fundamental problem of GP, i.e., it considers popularity from a global perspective of all users and uses a single set of popular items, and thus cannot capture the interests of individual users. As such, we propose a user-aware version of item popularity named personal popularity (PP), which identifies different popular items for each user by considering the users that share similar interests. As PP models the preferences of individual users, it naturally helps to produce personalized recommendations and mitigate GP bias. To integrate PP into recommendation, we design a general personal popularity aware counterfactual (PPAC) framework, which adapts easily to existing recommendation models. In particular, PPAC recognizes that PP and GP have both direct and indirect effects on recommendations and controls direct effects with counterfactual inference techniques for unbiased recommendations. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Stevenn9981/PPAC.

21 October 2023
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
WNWentao Ning
Wentao Ning
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
WLWeiwen Liu
Weiwen Liu
Reynold C.K. ChengReynold C.K. Cheng
Reynold C.K. Cheng
RZRui Zhang
Rui Zhang
BTBo Tang
Bo Tang

23 October 2023
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PGPing Gong
Ping Gong
RLRenjie Liu
Renjie Liu
ZMZunyao Mao
Zunyao Mao
ZCZhenkun Cai
Zhenkun Cai
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
ZLZhuozhao Li
Zhuozhao Li

4 August 2023
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PYPeiqi Yin
Peiqi Yin
XYXiao Yan
Xiao Yan
JZJinjing Zhou
Jinjing Zhou
QFQiang Fu
Qiang Fu
ZCZhenkun Cai
Zhenkun Cai
MWMinjie Wang
Minjie Wang
While many systems have been developed to train graph neural networks (GNNs), efficient model evaluation, which computes node embedding according to a given model, remains to be addressed. For instance, using the widely adopted node-wise approach, model evaluation can account for over 90% of the time in the end-to-end training process due to neighbor explosion, which means that a node accesses its multi-hop neighbors. The layer-wise approach avoids neighbor explosion by conducting computation layer by layer in GNN models. However, layer-wise model evaluation takes considerable implementation efforts because users need to manually decompose the GNN model into layers, and different implementations are required for GNN models with different structures. In this paper, we present DGI -a framework for easy and efficient GNN model evaluation, which automatically translates the training code of a GNN model for layer-wise evaluation to minimize user effort. DGI is general for different GNN models and evaluation requests (e.g., computing embedding for all or some of the nodes), and supports out-of-core execution on large graphs that cannot fit in CPU memory. Under the hood, DGI traces the computation graph of GNN model, partitions the computation graph into layers that are suitable for layer-wise evaluation according to tailored rules, and executes each layer efficiently by reordering the computation tasks and managing device memory consumption. Experiment results show that DGI matches hand-written implementations of layer-wise evaluation in efficiency and consistently outperforms node-wise evaluation across different datasets and hardware settings, and the speedup can be over 1,000x.