Keyi Wu

Keyi Wu

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Keyi Wu

Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2023 in Journal of Scientific Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KWKeyi Wu
Keyi Wu
TOThomas O’lEary-Roseberry
Thomas O’lEary-Roseberry
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
OGOmar Ghattas
Omar Ghattas

6 September 2022 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
KWKeyi Wu
Keyi Wu
TOThomas O'Leary-Roseberry
Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
OGOmar Ghattas
Omar Ghattas
We address the solution of large-scale Bayesian optimal experimental design (OED) problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) with infinite-dimensional parameter fields. The OED problem seeks to find sensor locations that maximize the expected information gain (EIG) in the solution of the underlying Bayesian inverse problem. Computation of the EIG is usually prohibitive for PDE-based OED problems. To make the evaluation of the EIG tractable, we approximate the (PDE-based) parameter-to-observable map with a derivative-informed projected neural network (DIPNet) surrogate, which exploits the geometry, smoothness, and intrinsic low-dimensionality of the map using a small and dimension-independent number of PDE solves. The surrogate is then deployed within a greedy algorithm-based solution of the OED problem such that no further PDE solves are required. We analyze the EIG approximation error in terms of the generalization error of the DIPNet and show they are of the same order. Finally, the efficiency and accuracy of the method are demonstrated via numerical experiments on OED problems governed by inverse scattering and inverse reactive transport with up to 16,641 uncertain parameters and 100 experimental design variables, where we observe up to three orders of magnitude speedup relative to a reference double loop Monte Carlo method.