Yield losses to waterlogging are expected to become an increasingly costly and frequent issue in some regions of the world. Despite the extensive work that has been carried out examining the molecular and physiological responses to waterlogging, phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance has proven difficult. This difficulty is largely due to the high variability of waterlogging conditions such as duration, temperature, soil type, and growth stage of the crop. In this review, we highlight use of phenotyping to assess and improve waterlogging tolerance in temperate crop species. We start by outlining the experimental methods that have been utilized to impose waterlogging stress, ranging from highly controlled conditions of hydroponic systems to large-scale screenings in the field. We also describe the phenotyping traits used to assess tolerance ranging from survival rates and visual scoring to precise photosynthetic measurements. Finally, we present an overview of the challenges faced in attempting to improve waterlogging tolerance, the trade-offs associated with phenotyping in controlled conditions, limitations of classic phenotyping methods, and future trends using plant-imaging methods. If effectively utilized to increase crop resilience to changing climates, crop phenotyping has a major role to play in global food security.

Farmers and breeders aim to improve crop responses to abiotic stresses and secure yield under adverse environmental conditions. To achieve this goal and select the most resilient genotypes, plant breeders and researchers rely on phenotyping to quantify crop responses to abiotic stress. Recent advances in imaging technologies allow researchers to collect physiological data non-destructively and throughout time, making it possible to dissect complex plant responses into quantifiable traits. The use of image-based technologies enables the quantification of crop responses to stress in both controlled environmental conditions and field trials. This paper summarizes phenotyping imaging technologies (RGB, multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, among others) that have been used to assess different abiotic stresses including salinity, drought and nitrogen deficiency, while discussing their advantages and drawbacks. We present a detailed review of traits involved in abiotic tolerance, which have been quantified by a range of imaging sensors under high-throughput phenotyping facilities or using unmanned aerial vehicles in the field. We also provide an up-to-date compilation of spectral tolerance indices and discuss the progress and challenges in machine learning, including supervised and unsupervised models as well as deep learning.

Waterlogging is expected to become a more prominent yield restricting stress for barley as rainfall frequency is increasing in many regions due to climate change. The duration of waterlogging events in the field is highly variable throughout the season, and this variation is also observed in experimental waterlogging studies. Such variety of protocols make intricate physiological responses challenging to assess and quantify. To assess barley waterlogging tolerance in controlled conditions, we present an optimal duration and setup of simulated waterlogging stress using image-based phenotyping. Six protocols durations, 5, 10, and 14 days of stress with and without seven days of recovery, were tested. To quantify the physiological effects of waterlogging on growth and greenness, we used top down and side view RGB (Red-Green-Blue) images. These images were taken daily throughout each of the protocols using the PSI PlantScreen™ imaging platform. Two genotypes of two-row spring barley, grown in glasshouse conditions, were subjected to each of the six protocols, with stress being imposed at the three-leaf stage. Shoot biomass and root imaging data were analysed to determine the optimal stress protocol duration, as well as to quantify the growth and morphometric changes of barley in response to waterlogging stress. Our time-series results show a significant growth reduction and alteration of greenness, allowing us to determine an optimal protocol duration of 14 days of stress and seven days of recovery for controlled conditions. Moreover, to confirm the reproducibility of this protocol, we conducted the same experiment in a different facility equipped with RGB and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging sensors. Our results demonstrate that the selected protocol enables the assessment of genotypic differences, which allow us to further determine tolerance responses in a glasshouse environment. Altogether, this work presents a new and reproducible image-based protocol to assess early stage waterlogging tolerance, empowering a precise quantification of waterlogging stress relevant markers such as greenness, Fv/Fm and growth rates.

Waterlogging is a major constraint on barley productivity, yet its dynamic, multi-phase nature makes it challenging to dissect using traditional phenotyping approaches. High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms address this by enabling temporal, multi-sensor imaging of large populations, but generate complex datasets that demand new analytical frameworks. Here, we imaged 230 barley accessions over 14 days of waterlogging stress and seven days of recovery using visible, chlorophyll fluorescence, and hyperspectral sensors. Explainable AI was applied to classify stress responses into early stress, late stress, and recovery phases, achieving 86% classification accuracy, and to identify the hyperspectral indices most informative for each phase. Water index (WATER1) and structure insensitive pigment index (SIPI) emerged as primary predictors of stress response. Longitudinal genome-wide association studies (GWAS), using a treatment-by-marker interaction model, identified 236 significant loci across 12 linkage disequilibrium blocks, implicating candidate genes involved in oxidative stress regulation, transcriptional control, and auxin transport. MYB transcription factors were consistently identified across all stress phases, underscoring their central role in waterlogging adaptation. To support interpretation of longitudinal GWAS results, we developed 3D-QTLVis, an interactive visualisation tool that extends Manhattan plots across time, enabling clearer identification of dynamic genomic regions underlying stress tolerance.

Barley is the most produced crop in Ireland; it is essential as a fodder crop and a key ingredient for the malting industry, contributing to Irish national identity. In Ireland, climate change is bringing more extreme rain; leading to an increase in flooding and waterlogging events. Barley is particularly sensitive to waterlogging urging the need to harness genetic diversity and breed barley with increased waterlogging tolerance to maintain current agricultural production. One of the limiting factors in breeding is the drawbacks of traditional phenotyping. This project relies on modern high-throughput phenotyping, which allow non-destructive, continuous and quantitative data collection. Using imaging sensors in controlled conditions, we phenotyped a collection of barley accessions under controlled and waterlogged conditions using RGB, fluorescent and hyperspectral cameras (VNIR and SWIR). We used the core European Barley Heritage collection (ExHIBiT); made up of 230 diverse 2-row spring barley accessions. This collection was assembled, genotyped, agronomically characterized and its application for association mapping has been established by our team. We observed that 14 days of waterlogging lead to a significant reduction in pixel count (Project Shoot Area) and Quantum yield, showing a large impact on several hyperspectral indices. We also observed that 7 days of recovery after stress are fundamental for differentiate stress resilience. Work is ongoing to optimize hyperspectral image analysis, and establish parameters to distinguish plant performance, enabling to discriminate between resilient and sensitive accessions. These data will be used for association mapping to identify genetic regions contributing to waterlogging tolerance in spring barley.