Muhammad Minhajuddin

Muhammad Minhajuddin

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Muhammad Minhajuddin

School of Computer Science and Technology, Algoma University Brampton, Brampton, Canada, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MMMuhammad Minhajuddin
Muhammad Minhajuddin
KTKhoa Tran
Khoa Tran
AGArjun Grewal
Arjun Grewal
RKRupinder Kaur
Rupinder Kaur
AAArghavan Asad
Arghavan Asad
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) connects quantum processing units (QPUs) to execute programs beyond the capacity of a single processor. Understanding its scalability requires examining the interactions between hardware, communication, software, and security. This structured review synthesizes 126 studies, mainly published between 2020 and 2026 with foundational earlier work, retrieved from eight sources and selected using documented inclusion and exclusion criteria. We organize the literature into five pillars: infrastructure, protocols, applications, compilation, and security. A common scoping rule distinguishes work enabling distributed computation from broader quantum communication research. The synthesis identifies interconnect rate and fidelity, classical control latency, remote-operation overhead, and coherence constraints as coupled limits on distributed execution. Infrastructure and protocol research includes experimental demonstrations, whereas application and compiler evaluations remain predominantly simulation-based. Security requires both protected interconnects and confidential, verifiable delegated computation. Comparisons across the pillars reveal tradeoffs between local computation, communication resources, sampling overhead, and trust assumptions. The review highlights unresolved challenges in distributed fault tolerance, transduction, interoperable software, benchmarking, and integrated security. Its central conclusion is that scalable DQC requires coordinated hardware–software–network design and evaluation of complete systems rather than isolated improvements within individual layers.