Leena Myllys

Leena Myllys

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Leena Myllys

University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2014 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJolanta Miadlikowska
Jolanta Miadlikowska
FKFrank Kauff
Frank Kauff
FHFilip Högnabba
Filip Högnabba
JOJeffrey Oliver
Jeffrey Oliver
KMKatalin Molnár
Katalin Molnár
SSSoili Stenroos
Soili Stenroos

24 August 2015 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pradeep K. DivakarPradeep K. Divakar
Pradeep K. Divakar
ACAna Crespo
Ana Crespo
MWMats Wedin
Mats Wedin
SLSteven D. Leavitt
Steven D. Leavitt
DHDavid L. Hawksworth
David L. Hawksworth
HLHelge Thorsten Lumbsch
Helge Thorsten Lumbsch

30 April 2010 in Cladistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSoili Stenroos
Soili Stenroos
TLTomi Laukka
Tomi Laukka
SHSeppo Huhtinen
Seppo Huhtinen
PDPeter Döbbeler
Peter Döbbeler
LMLeena Myllys
Leena Myllys
JHJaakko Hyvönen
Jaakko Hyvönen

19 July 2019 in Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBC.G. Boluda
C.G. Boluda
VRV.J. Rico
V.J. Rico
PDP.K. Divakar
P.K. Divakar
ONO. Nadyeina
O. Nadyeina
LML. Myllys
L. Myllys
DHD.L. Hawksworth
D.L. Hawksworth
In many lichen-forming fungi, molecular phylogenetic analyses lead to the discovery of cryptic species within traditional morphospecies. However, in some cases, molecular sequence data also questions the separation of phenotypically characterised species. Here we apply an integrative taxonomy approach – including morphological, chemical, molecular, and distributional characters – to re-assess species boundaries in a traditionally speciose group of hair lichens, Bryoria sect. Implexae. We sampled multilocus sequence and microsatellite data from 142 specimens from a broad intercontinental distribution. Molecular data included DNA sequences of the standard fungal markers ITS, IGS, GAPDH, two newly tested loci (FRBi15 and FRBi16), and SSR frequencies from 18 microsatellite markers. Datasets were analysed with Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction, phenogram reconstruction, STRUCTURE Bayesian clustering, principal coordinate analysis, haplotype network, and several different species delimitation analyses (ABGD, PTP, GMYC, and DISSECT). Additionally, past population demography and divergence times are estimated. The different approaches to species recognition do not support the monophyly of the 11 currently accepted morphospecies, and rather suggest the reduction of these to four phylogenetic species. Moreover, three of these are relatively recent in origin and cryptic, including phenotypically and chemically variable specimens. Issues regarding the integration of an evolutionary perspective into taxonomic conclusions in species complexes, which have undergone recent diversification, are discussed. The four accepted species, all epitypified by sequenced material, are Bryoria fuscescens, B. glabra, B. kockiana, and B. pseudofuscescens. Ten species rank names are reduced to synonymy. In the absence of molecular data, they can be recorded as the B. fuscescens complex. Intraspecific phenotype plasticity and factors affecting the speciation of different morphospecies in this group of Bryoria are outlined.

5 October 2011 in The Lichenologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LMLeena Myllys
Leena Myllys
SVSaara Velmala
Saara Velmala
HHHåkon Holien
Håkon Holien
PHPekka Halonen
Pekka Halonen
LWLi-Song Wang
Li-Song Wang
TGTrevor Goward
Trevor Goward
The phylogenetic relationships of the genusBryoriawere examined using ITS, partial glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and mitochondrial SSU rDNA sequence data in addition to 20 chemical and morphological characters. This first comprehensive molecular study to assessBryoriaphylogeny includes representatives from all the traditionally recognized four sections. Combined cladistic analyses of 88Bryoriaspecimens representing at least 25 species resulted in highly resolved phylogenies. Based on the results, a new infrageneric classification for the genus is proposed. Five sections are recognized, largely corresponding to the existing classification, with the addition of sectionAmericanae. The study shows that while most species with an erect growth-form are clearly monophyletic, current species status of many pendent taxa can be questioned.

1 April 2003 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLeena Myllys
Leena Myllys
SSSoili Stenroos
Soili Stenroos
ATArne Thell
Arne Thell
TATeuvo Ahti
Teuvo Ahti