Gindo Tampubolon

Gindo Tampubolon

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gindo Tampubolon

NIHR Policy Research Unit on Healthy Ageing, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 April 2018 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAsri Maharani
Asri Maharani
PDPiers Dawes
Piers Dawes
JNJames Nazroo
James Nazroo
GTGindo Tampubolon
Gindo Tampubolon
NPNeil Pendleton
Neil Pendleton
THTherese von Hanno
Therese von Hanno

20 June 2020 in World Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJohan Oldekop
Johan Oldekop
RHRory Horner
Rory Horner
DHDavid Hulme
David Hulme
RARoshan Adhikari
Roshan Adhikari
BABina Agarwal
Bina Agarwal
YZYin-Fang Zhang
Yin-Fang Zhang

1 June 2007 in Research Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMA. Mina
A. Mina
RRR. Ramlogan
R. Ramlogan
GTG. Tampubolon
G. Tampubolon
JMJ.S. Metcalfe
J.S. Metcalfe

25 April 2018 in Age and Ageing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAsri Maharani
Asri Maharani
PDPiers Dawes
Piers Dawes
JNJames Nazroo
James Nazroo
GTGindo Tampubolon
Gindo Tampubolon
NPNeil Pendleton
Neil Pendleton
Highly prevalagent hearing and vision sensory impairments among older people may contribute to the risk of cognitive decline and pathological impairments including dementia. This study aims to determine whether single and dual sensory impairment (hearing and/or vision) are independently associated with cognitive decline among older adults and to describe cognitive trajectories according to their impairment pattern. we used data from totals of 13,123, 11,417 and 21,265 respondents aged 50+ at baseline from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), respectively. We performed growth curve analysis to identify cognitive trajectories, and a joint model was used to deal with attrition problems in longitudinal ageing surveys. respondents with a single sensory impairment had lower episodic memory score than those without sensory impairment in HRS (β = −0.15, P < 0.001), ELSA (β = −0.14, P < 0.001) and SHARE (β = −0.26, P < 0.001). The analysis further shows that older adults with dual sensory impairment in HRS (β = −0.25, P < 0.001), ELSA (β = −0.35, P < 0.001) and SHARE (β = −0.68, P < 0.001) remembered fewer words compared with those with no sensory impairment. The stronger associations between sensory impairment and lower episodic memory levels were found in the joint model which accounted for attrition. hearing and/or vision impairments are a marker for the risk of cognitive decline that could inform preventative interventions to maximise cognitive health and longevity. Further studies are needed to investigate how sensory markers could inform strategies to improve cognitive ageing.

2 February 2015 in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlan Marshall
Alan Marshall
JNJames Nazroo
James Nazroo
GTGindo Tampubolon
Gindo Tampubolon
BVBram Vanhoutte
Bram Vanhoutte
Background The level of frailty in the older population across age cohorts and how this changes is a factor in determining future care costs and may also influence the extent of socioeconomic and gender inequalities in frailty. Methods We model cohort-specific trajectories in frailty among the community dwelling population older than 50 years, using five waves (2002–2010) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. We stratify our analysis by wealth and gender and use a frailty index, based on accumulation of ‘deficits’. Results For males and females between the ages of 50 and 70 in 2002, frailty trajectories for adjacent age cohorts converge. However, levels of frailty are higher in recent compared with earlier cohorts at the older ages (for cohorts aged over 70 in 2002). These cohort differences are largest in the poorest wealth group, while for the most affluent, frailty trajectories overlap across all adjacent cohorts suggesting no change across cohorts. Conclusions A key driver of the cohort differences in frailty that we observe is likely to be increased survival of frail individuals. Importantly, this paper illustrates that the social conditions experienced across the wealth distribution impacts on the rate of deficit accumulation in older populations. Our results on trajectories of frailty between 2002 and 2010 are pessimistic and, in the context of rising life expectancies, suggest that poorer older people in particular spend additional years of life in a frail state.

12 April 2019 in The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAsri Maharani
Asri Maharani
PDPiers Dawes
Piers Dawes
JNJames Nazroo
James Nazroo
GTGindo Tampubolon
Gindo Tampubolon
NPNeil Pendleton
Neil Pendleton
THTherese von Hanno
Therese von Hanno
Objectives: We aimed to determine whether self-assessed single (hearing or visual) and dual sensory (hearing and visual) impairments are associated with cognitive decline and incident possible cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) and probable dementia. Method: Data were drawn from the 1996–2014 surveys of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), involving 19,618 respondents who had no probable dementia and who were aged 50 years or older at the baseline. We used linear mixed models to test the association between self-assessed sensory impairment and cognitive decline followed by a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the relative risk of incident possible CIND and probable dementia associated with the presence of sensory impairment. Results: Respondents with self-assessed single and dual sensory impairment performed worse in cognitive tests than those without sensory impairment. The fully adjusted incidence of developing possible CIND was 17% higher for respondents with hearing impairment than those without hearing impairment. Respondents with visual impairment had 35% and 25% higher risk for developing possible CIND and probable dementia, respectively, than those without visual impairment. Respondents with dual sensory impairment at baseline were 38% and 26% more likely to develop possible CIND and probable dementia, respectively, than those with no sensory impairment. Discussion: Self-assessed sensory impairment is independently associated with cognitive decline and incident possible CIND and probable dementia. Further studies are needed to identify the mechanism underlying this association and to determine whether treatment of sensory impairment could ameliorate cognitive decline and delay the onset of dementia among older adults.