Andrew David Maynard

Andrew David Maynard

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Andrew David Maynard

Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2008 in Nature Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPCraig Poland
Craig Poland
RDRodger Duffin
Rodger Duffin
IKIan Kinloch
Ian Kinloch
AMAndrew Maynard
Andrew Maynard
WWWilliam A. H. Wallace
William A. H. Wallace
KDKen Donaldson
Ken Donaldson

6 October 2005 in Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGünter Oberdörster
Günter Oberdörster
AMAndrew Maynard
Andrew Maynard
KDKen Donaldson
Ken Donaldson
VCVincent Castranova
Vincent Castranova
JFJulie Fitzpatrick
Julie Fitzpatrick
AGA report from the ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working Group
A report from the ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working Group
The rapid proliferation of many different engineered nanomaterials (defined as materials designed and produced to have structural features with at least one dimension of 100 nanometers or less) presents a dilemma to regulators regarding hazard identification. The International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute convened an expert working group to develop a screening strategy for the hazard identification of engineered nanomaterials. The working group report presents theelementsof a screening strategy rather than a detailed testing protocol. Based on an evaluation of the limited data currently available, the report presents a broad data gathering strategy applicable to this early stage in the development of a risk assessment process for nanomaterials. Oral, dermal, inhalation, and injection routes of exposure are included recognizing that, depending on use patterns, exposure to nanomaterials may occur by any of these routes. The three key elements of the toxicity screening strategy are: Physicochemical Characteristics,In VitroAssays (cellular and non-cellular), andIn VivoAssays.There is a strong likelihood that biological activity of nanoparticles will depend on physicochemical parameters not routinely considered in toxicity screening studies. Physicochemical properties that may be important in understanding the toxic effects of test materials include particle size and size distribution, agglomeration state, shape, crystal structure, chemical composition, surface area, surface chemistry, surface charge, and porosity.In vitrotechniques allow specific biological and mechanistic pathways to be isolated and tested under controlled conditions, in ways that are not feasible inin vivotests. Tests are suggested for portal-of-entry toxicity for lungs, skin, and the mucosal membranes, and target organ toxicity for endothelium, blood, spleen, liver, nervous system, heart, and kidney. Non-cellular assessment of nanoparticle durability, protein interactions, complement activation, and pro-oxidant activity is also considered.Tier 1in vivoassays are proposed for pulmonary, oral, skin and injection exposures, and Tier 2 evaluations for pulmonary exposures are also proposed. Tier 1 evaluations include markers of inflammation, oxidant stress, and cell proliferation in portal-of-entry and selected remote organs and tissues. Tier 2 evaluations for pulmonary exposures could include deposition, translocation, and toxicokinetics and biopersistence studies; effects of multiple exposures; potential effects on the reproductive system, placenta, and fetus; alternative animal models; and mechanistic studies.

15 November 2006 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrew D. Maynard
Andrew D. Maynard
RARobert J. Aitken
Robert J. Aitken
TBTilman Butz
Tilman Butz
VCVicki Colvin
Vicki Colvin
KDKen Donaldson
Ken Donaldson
DWDavid B. Warheit
David B. Warheit

1 November 2005 in American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAnna A. Shvedova
Anna A. Shvedova
EKElena R. Kisin
Elena R. Kisin
RMRobert Mercer
Robert Mercer
AMAshley R. Murray
Ashley R. Murray
VJVictor J. Johnson
Victor J. Johnson
PBPaul Baron
Paul Baron
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) are new materials of emerging technological importance. As SWCNT are introduced into the life cycle of commercial products, their effects on human health and environment should be addressed. We demonstrated that pharyngeal aspiration of SWCNT elicited unusual pulmonary effects in C57BL/6 mice that combined a robust but acute inflammation with early onset yet progressive fibrosis and granulomas. A dose-dependent increase in the protein, LDH, and γ-glutamyl transferase activities in bronchoalveolar lavage were found along with accumulation of 4-hydroxynonenal (oxidative biomarker) and depletion of glutathione in lungs. An early neutrophils accumulation ( day 1), followed by lymphocyte ( day 3) and macrophage ( day 7) influx, was accompanied by early elevation of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β; day 1) followed by fibrogenic transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 (peaked on day 7). A rapid progressive fibrosis found in mice exhibited two distinct morphologies: 1) SWCNT-induced granulomas mainly associated with hypertrophied epithelial cells surrounding SWCNT aggregates and 2) diffuse interstitial fibrosis and alveolar wall thickening likely associated with dispersed SWCNT. In vitro exposure of murine RAW 264.7 macrophages to SWCNT triggered TGF-β1 production similarly to zymosan but generated less TNF-α and IL-1β. SWCNT did not cause superoxide or NO·production, active SWCNT engulfment, or apoptosis in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Functional respiratory deficiencies and decreased bacterial clearance ( Listeria monocytogenes) were found in mice treated with SWCNT. Equal doses of ultrafine carbon black particles or fine crystalline silica (SiO2) did not induce granulomas or alveolar wall thickening and caused a significantly weaker pulmonary inflammation and damage.

1 June 2003 in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAnna Shvedova
Anna Shvedova
VCVincent Castranova
Vincent Castranova
EKElena Kisin
Elena Kisin
DSDiane Schwegler-Berry
Diane Schwegler-Berry
AMAshley Murray
Ashley Murray
PBPaul Baron
Paul Baron
Carbon nanotubes are new members of carbon allotropes similar to fullerenes and graphite. Because of their unique electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties, carbon nanotubes are important for novel applications in the electronics, aerospace, and computer industries. Exposure to graphite and carbon materials has been associated with increased incidence of skin diseases, such as carbon fiber dermatitis, hyperkeratosis, and naevi. We investigated adverse effects of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) using a cell culture of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes (HaCaT). After 18 h of exposure of HaCaT to SWCNT, oxidative stress and cellular toxicity were indicated by formation of free radicals, accumulation of peroxidative products, antioxidant depletion, and loss of cell viability. Exposure to SWCNT also resulted in ultrastructural and morphological changes in cultured skin cells. These data indicate that dermal exposure to unrefined SWCNT may lead to dermal toxicity due to accelerated oxidative stress in the skin of exposed workers.

1 August 2006 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AEAlison Elder
Alison Elder
RGRobert Gelein
Robert Gelein
VSVanessa Silva
Vanessa Silva
TFTessa Feikert
Tessa Feikert
LOLisa Opanashuk
Lisa Opanashuk
GOGünter Oberdörster
Günter Oberdörster
Studies in monkeys with intranasally instilled gold ultrafine particles (UFPs; < 100 nm) and in rats with inhaled carbon UFPs suggested that solid UFPs deposited in the nose travel along the olfactory nerve to the olfactory bulb.To determine if ...