Rohan Khera

Rohan Khera

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Rohan Khera

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 June 2016 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRohan Khera
Rohan Khera
MMMohammad Hassan Murad
Mohammad Hassan Murad
ACApoorva K. Chandar
Apoorva K. Chandar
PDParambir S. Dulai
Parambir S. Dulai
ZWZhen Wang
Zhen Wang
SSSiddharth Singh
Siddharth Singh
Five medications have been approved for the management of obesity, but data on comparative effectiveness are limited. To compare weight loss and adverse events among drug treatments for obesity using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 23, 2016; clinical trial registries. Randomized clinical trials conducted among overweight and obese adults treated with US Food and Drug Administration-approved long-term weight loss agents (orlistat, lorcaserin, naltrexone-bupropion, phentermine-topiramate, or liraglutide) for at least 1 year compared with another active agent or placebo. Two investigators identified studies and independently abstracted data using a predefined protocol. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed and relative ranking of agents was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Proportions of patients with at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss, magnitude of decrease in weight, and discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events at 1 year. Twenty-eight randomized clinical trials with 29 018 patients (median age, 46 years; 74% women; median baseline body weight, 100.5 kg; median baseline body mass index, 36.1) were included. A median 23% of placebo participants had at least 5% weight loss vs 75% of participants taking phentermine-topiramate (odds ratio [OR], 9.22; 95% credible interval [CrI], 6.63-12.85; SUCRA, 0.95), 63% of participants taking liraglutide (OR, 5.54; 95% CrI, 4.16-7.78; SUCRA, 0.83), 55% taking naltrexone-bupropion (OR, 3.96; 95% CrI, 3.03-5.11; SUCRA, 0.60), 49% taking lorcaserin (OR, 3.10; 95% CrI, 2.38-4.05; SUCRA, 0.39), and 44% taking orlistat (OR, 2.70; 95% CrI, 2.34-3.09; SUCRA, 0.22). All active agents were associated with significant excess weight loss compared with placebo at 1 year-phentermine-topiramate, 8.8 kg (95% CrI, -10.20 to -7.42 kg); liraglutide, 5.3 kg (95% CrI, -6.06 to -4.52 kg); naltrexone-bupropion, 5.0 kg (95% CrI, -5.94 to -3.96 kg); lorcaserin, 3.2 kg (95% CrI, -3.97 to -2.46 kg); and orlistat, 2.6 kg (95% CrI, -3.04 to -2.16 kg). Compared with placebo, liraglutide (OR, 2.95; 95% CrI, 2.11-4.23) and naltrexone-bupropion (OR, 2.64; 95% CrI, 2.10-3.35) were associated with the highest odds of adverse event-related treatment discontinuation. High attrition rates (30%-45% in all trials) were associated with lower confidence in estimates. Among overweight or obese adults, orlistat, lorcaserin, naltrexone-bupropion, phentermine-topiramate, and liraglutide, compared with placebo, were each associated with achieving at least 5% weight loss at 52 weeks. Phentermine-topiramate and liraglutide were associated with the highest odds of achieving at least 5% weight loss.

28 November 2017 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRohan Khera
Rohan Khera
SASuveen Angraal
Suveen Angraal
TCTyler Couch
Tyler Couch
JWJohn W. Welsh
John W. Welsh
BNBrahmajee K. Nallamothu
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
HKHarlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz
Publicly available data sets hold much potential and support the assessment of patterns of care and outcomes. Further, they lead to democratization of research, thereby allowing novel approaches to studying disease conditions, processes of care, and patient outcomes.1 However, the design properties of publicly available data sets may require specific analytic approaches. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS), which is a large administrative database produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), has been increasingly used as a data source for research.2 Developed under the AHRQ Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), the NIS includes administrative and demographic data from a 20% sample of inpatient hospitalizations in the United States and has been compiled annually since 1988 through a partnership between multiple statewide data organizations to annually contribute data for all-payer health care utilization.3,4

1 July 2017 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRohan Khera
Rohan Khera
HKHarlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz

24 June 2024 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRohan Khera
Rohan Khera
EOEvangelos K. Oikonomou
Evangelos K. Oikonomou
GNGirish N. Nadkarni
Girish N. Nadkarni
JMJessica R. Morley
Jessica R. Morley
JWJenna Wiens
Jenna Wiens
ETEric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol

12 January 2021 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNicholas S. Hendren
Nicholas S. Hendren
JLJames A. de Lemos
James A. de Lemos
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
SDSandeep R. Das
Sandeep R. Das
ARAnjali Rao
Anjali Rao
JGJustin L. Grodin
Justin L. Grodin
Background: Obesity may contribute to adverse outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, studies of large, broadly generalizable patient populations are lacking, and the effect of body mass index (BMI) on COVID-19 outcomes— particularly in younger adults—remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed data from patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at 88 US hospitals enrolled in the American Heart Association’s COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry with data collection through July 22, 2020. BMI was stratified by World Health Organization obesity class, with normal weight prespecified as the reference group. Results: Obesity, and, in particular, class III obesity, was overrepresented in the registry in comparison with the US population, with the largest differences among adults ≤50 years. Among 7606 patients, in-hospital death or mechanical ventilation occurred in 2109 (27.7%), in-hospital death in 1302 (17.1%), and mechanical ventilation in 1602 (21.1%). After multivariable adjustment, classes I to III obesity were associated with higher risks of in-hospital death or mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09–1.51], 1.57 [1.29–1.91], 1.80 [1.47–2.20], respectively), and class III obesity was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death (hazard ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.00–1.58]). Overweight and class I to III obese individuals were at higher risk for mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09–1.51], 1.54 [1.29–1.84], 1.88 [1.52–2.32], and 2.08 [1.68–2.58], respectively). Significant BMI by age interactions were seen for all primary end points ( P -interaction70 years. Severe obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m 2 ) was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death only in those ≤50 years (hazard ratio, 1.36 [1.01–1.84]). In adjusted analyses, higher BMI was associated with dialysis initiation and with venous thromboembolism but not with major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions: Obese patients are more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19, and are at higher risk of in-hospital death or mechanical ventilation, in particular, if young (age ≤50 years). Obese patients are also at higher risk for venous thromboembolism and dialysis. These observations support clear public health messaging and rigorous adherence to COVID-19 prevention strategies in all obese individuals regardless of age.

1 December 2014 in Atherosclerosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSnigdha Jain
Snigdha Jain
RKRohan Khera
Rohan Khera
VCVicente F. Corrales–Medina
Vicente F. Corrales–Medina
RTRaymond R. Townsend
Raymond R. Townsend
JCJulio A. Chirinos
Julio A. Chirinos