Robert F. Schwabe

Robert F. Schwabe

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Robert F. Schwabe

Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2007 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEkihiro Seki
Ekihiro Seki
SMSamuele De Minicis
Samuele De Minicis
CÖChristoph H Österreicher
Christoph H Österreicher
JKJohannes Kluwe
Johannes Kluwe
YOYosuke Osawa
Yosuke Osawa
RSRobert F Schwabe
Robert F Schwabe

17 October 2013 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRobert F. Schwabe
Robert F. Schwabe
CJChristian Jobin
Christian Jobin

22 November 2013 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIngmar Mederacke
Ingmar Mederacke
CHChristine C. Hsu
Christine C. Hsu
JTJuliane S. Troeger
Juliane S. Troeger
PHPeter Huebener
Peter Huebener
XMXueru Mu
Xueru Mu
RSRobert F. Schwabe
Robert F. Schwabe
Although organ fibrosis causes significant morbidity and mortality in chronic diseases, the lack of detailed knowledge about specific cellular contributors mediating fibrogenesis hampers the design of effective antifibrotic therapies. Different cellular sources, including tissue-resident and bone marrow-derived fibroblasts, pericytes and epithelial cells, have been suggested to give rise to myofibroblasts, but their relative contributions remain controversial, with profound differences between organs and different diseases. Here we employ a novel Cre-transgenic mouse that marks 99% of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), a liver-specific pericyte population, to demonstrate that HSCs give rise to 82–96% of myofibroblasts in models of toxic, cholestatic and fatty liver disease. Moreover, we exclude that HSCs function as facultative epithelial progenitor cells in the injured liver. On the basis these findings, HSCs should be considered the primary cellular target for antifibrotic therapies across all types of liver disease.

4 February 2011 in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTom Lüdde
Tom Lüdde
RSRobert F. Schwabe
Robert F. Schwabe

1 April 2012 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDianne H. Dapito
Dianne H. Dapito
AMAli Mencin
Ali Mencin
GGGeum-Youn Gwak
Geum-Youn Gwak
JPJean-Philippe Pradere
Jean-Philippe Pradere
MJMyoung-Kuk Jang
Myoung-Kuk Jang
RSRobert F. Schwabe
Robert F. Schwabe

26 July 2014 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEkihiro Seki
Ekihiro Seki
RSRobert F. Schwabe
Robert F. Schwabe
Inflammation is one of the most characteristic features of chronic liver disease of viral, alcoholic, fatty, and autoimmune origin. Inflammation is typically present in all disease stages and associated with the development of fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the past decade, numerous studies have contributed to improved understanding of the links between hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Here, we review mechanisms that link inflammation with the development of liver fibrosis, focusing on the role of inflammatory mediators in hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation and HSC survival during fibrogenesis and fibrosis regression. We will summarize the contributions of different inflammatory cells, including hepatic macrophages, T and B lymphocytes, natural killer cells and platelets, as well as key effectors, such as cytokines, chemokines, and damage‐associated molecular patterns. Furthermore, we will discuss the relevance of inflammatory signaling pathways for clinical liver disease and for the development of antifibrogenic strategies. (Hepatology 2015;61:1066–1079)