The alveolar ridge undergoes a loss in volume and atrophy after tooth extraction. Understanding the wound healing and bone regeneration process after tooth extraction is a key factor in the insertion of dental implants. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the socket healing process after the extraction of upper premolars based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) over six months. Special focus was placed on the morphological changes in the alveolar crest and within the socket. A retrospective analysis of patients in need of tooth extraction in the upper premolar region was performed in this study. All patients received flapless tooth extraction under local anesthesia and CBCT immediately after tooth extraction. Further CBCT analysis was performed after three months for the first group (n = 18) and after six months for the second group (n = 18). The results showed that all sockets underwent an inward movement of the defect walls towards the defect center, resulting in reduced total alveolar ridge volume and defect volume. This result was observed after three months and persisted after six months. The inward movement was quantified as a vertical socket collapse of up to 30.1 ± 9.0% after three months and 34.3 ± 6.7% after six months. The horizontal inward movement was quantified as a buccal socket collapse of 47.7 ± 12.3% after three months and 55.7 ± 29.1% after six months. New bone formation within the socket was evident, especially in the occlusal part of the socket. Additionally, bone formation was primarily observed as bone apposition along the socket walls and did not reach the defect center in most cases. The combination of socket collapse and bone apposition led to the formation of cavitations inside the socket that were mostly localized under the occlusal part. These novel findings with respect to socket collapse and formation of cavitation represent a paradigm shift and call for reconsidering the current understanding of socket healing. Based on the data, socket healing should be understood as a patient-specific process that requires 3D radiographic analysis for planning dental implants.

Third molar extraction is a common oral surgical procedure that can be accompanied by challenges in wound healing and bone regeneration. Materials such as bone substitute materials (BSMs) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) are often used to support socket regeneration. This prospective randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial compared PRF application combined with BSM versus PRF alone in patients requiring bilateral third molar extraction. A total of 15 patients underwent standardized osteotomy procedures, with sockets filled either with PRF alone (control group) or with BSM + PRF on opposite sides (test group) under general anesthesia and with patients blinded to the treatment allocation. Postoperative pain and swelling were measured over 7 days using a visual analog scale and anatomical distance measurements, respectively. Bone regeneration was evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans after an average healing period of six months, with results showing no significant differences between groups in terms of postoperative pain or swelling (n = 12; 3 patients were lost to randomization). However, CBCT imaging revealed covered socket residuum (CSR)—non-mineralized areas within the socket—in the PRF only group, whereas the BSM + PRF group demonstrated more homogeneous and mineralized bone formation throughout the extraction sites (n = 8; 5 patients were lost to follow-up). These non-mineralized areas represent covered socket residuum within the extraction sockets, which poses a clinical risk of infection and may negatively affect the dental health of the adjacent second molar. Based on the presented findings, we recommend combining BSM with PRF to support bone regeneration and regulate the postoperative pain and swelling following third molar extraction. Nevertheless, further research is required to determine the most suitable BSM type in this regard.

Jawbone cavitations have been described for decades under various terminologies, including neuralgia-inducing cavitational osteonecrosis (NICO) and fatty degenerative osteolysis of the jawbone (FDOJ). Their biological nature and clinical relevance remain controversial. The present review aimed to summarize the current understanding of jawbone cavitations, identify relevant research gaps, and propose a unified descriptive terminology. This narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and manual searches of relevant journals. The available evidence was qualitatively synthesized. The results indicate that most published data on jawbone cavitations are derived from observational, retrospective, and cohort studies, with etiological concepts largely based on histopathological findings. Recent three-dimensional radiological analyses suggest that intraosseous non-mineralized areas frequently observed at former extraction sites may represent a physiological outcome of socket collapse and incomplete ossification rather than a pathological condition. This review introduces Covered Socket Residuum (CSR) as a radiological descriptive term and clearly distinguishes it from pathological entities such as NICO and FDOJ. Recognition of CSR is clinically relevant, particularly in dental implant planning, where unrecognized non-mineralized areas may compromise primary stability. The findings emphasize the role of three-dimensional radiological assessment for diagnosis and implant planning and discuss preventive and therapeutic strategies, including Guided Open Wound Healing (GOWH^TM). Prospective controlled clinical studies are required to validate this concept and determine its clinical relevance.

Background/Objectives: After tooth extraction the crest may close before the socket has mineralized, leaving a covered socket residuum (CSR). Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) accelerated soft tissue closure of molar and premolar sockets in a randomized controlled trial. We asked whether PRF also changes the way these sockets fill with bone. Methods: Radiological analysis of a prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial in which sockets were filled with solid PRF or left to heal unassisted. Cone beam computed tomography was acquired after extraction and after about three months. We assessed three-dimensional reconstructions for a CSR and for collapse of the walls and analysed registered scan pairs volumetrically with an observer-independent method. Results: Twenty-nine sockets were included (control n = 17, PRF n = 12). In all 21 sockets with an assignable three-dimensional reconstruction a CSR was found, and the walls moved inward in both groups. In 17 registered scan pairs, the median mineralized share of the original socket volume was 25% in the control and 51% in the PRF group (p = 0.07), and the non-mineralized volume 285 and 144 mm³ (p = 0.046). After adjustment for tooth type and follow-up interval, the mineralized share was 18 percentage points higher with PRF (p = 0.03). An earlier Fiji-based analysis of the same sockets showed the same group difference (p = 0.03). Every socket retained a coherent non-mineralized space. Conclusions: PRF did not prevent socket collapse or a CSR in premolar and first molar sockets, although it shifted early healing toward mineralization. Where the socket volume is to be preserved, a space-maintaining material is needed, with PRF as its carrier.