Katherine R. O'BRien

Katherine R. O'BRien

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Katherine R. O'BRien

School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2015 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarieke M. van Katwijk
Marieke M. van Katwijk
ATAnitra Thorhaug
Anitra Thorhaug
NMNúria Marbà
Núria Marbà
RORobert J. Orth
Robert J. Orth
CDCarlos M Duarte
Carlos M Duarte
JVJennifer J. Verduin
Jennifer J. Verduin
Summary: In coastal and estuarine systems, foundation species like seagrasses, mangroves, saltmarshes or corals provide important ecosystem services. Seagrasses are globally declining and their reintroduction has been shown to restore ecosystem functions. However, seagrass restoration is often challenging, given the dynamic and stressful environment that seagrasses often grow in. From our world‐wide meta‐analysis of seagrass restoration trials (1786 trials), we describe general features and best practice for seagrass restoration. We confirm that removal of threats is important prior to replanting. Reduced water quality (mainly eutrophication), and construction activities led to poorer restoration success than, for instance, dredging, local direct impact and natural causes. Proximity to and recovery of donor beds were positively correlated with trial performance. Planting techniques can influence restoration success. The meta‐analysis shows that both trial survival and seagrass population growth rate in trials that survived are positively affected by the number of plants or seeds initially transplanted. This relationship between restoration scale and restoration success was not related to trial characteristics of the initial restoration. The majority of the seagrass restoration trials have been very small, which may explain the low overall trial survival rate (i.e. estimated 37%). Successful regrowth of the foundation seagrass species appears to require crossing a minimum threshold of reintroduced individuals. Our study provides the first global field evidence for the requirement of a critical mass for recovery, which may also hold for other foundation species showing strong positive feedback to a dynamic environment. Synthesis and applications. For effective restoration of seagrass foundation species in its typically dynamic, stressful environment, introduction of large numbers is seen to be beneficial and probably serves two purposes. First, a large‐scale planting increases trial survival – large numbers ensure the spread of risks, which is needed to overcome high natural variability. Secondly, a large‐scale trial increases population growth rate by enhancing self‐sustaining feedback, which is generally found in foundation species in stressful environments such as seagrass beds. Thus, by careful site selection and applying appropriate techniques, spreading of risks and enhancing self‐sustaining feedback in concert increase success of seagrass restoration.

1 November 2015 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKieryn Kilminster
Kieryn Kilminster
KMKathryn McMahon
Kathryn McMahon
MWMichelle Waycott
Michelle Waycott
GKGary Kendrick
Gary Kendrick
PSPeter Scanes
Peter Scanes
JUJames Udy
James Udy

1 September 2016 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPaul S. Maxwell
Paul S. Maxwell
JEJohan S. Eklöf
Johan S. Eklöf
MKMarieke M. van Katwijk
Marieke M. van Katwijk
KOKatherine R. O'Brien
Katherine R. O'Brien
MTMaricela de la Torre‐Castro
Maricela de la Torre‐Castro
THTjisse van der Heide
Tjisse van der Heide

26 October 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VHValerie Hagger
Valerie Hagger
TWThomas Worthington
Thomas Worthington
CLCatherine Lovelock
Catherine Lovelock
MAMaria Fernanda Adame
Maria Fernanda Adame
TATatsuya Amano
Tatsuya Amano
MSMegan I. Saunders
Megan I. Saunders
Mangrove forests store high amounts of carbon, protect communities from storms, and support fisheries. Mangroves exist in complex social-ecological systems, hence identifying socioeconomic conditions associated with decreasing losses and increasing gains remains challenging albeit important. The impact of national governance and conservation policies on mangrove conservation at the landscape-scale has not been assessed to date, nor have the interactions with local economic pressures and biophysical drivers. Here, we assess the relationship between socioeconomic and biophysical variables and mangrove change across coastal geomorphic units worldwide from 1996 to 2016. Globally, we find that drivers of loss can also be drivers of gain, and that drivers have changed over 20 years. The association with economic growth appears to have reversed, shifting from negatively impacting mangroves in the first decade to enabling mangrove expansion in the second decade. Importantly, we find that community forestry is promoting mangrove expansion, whereas conversion to agriculture and aquaculture, often occurring in protected areas, results in high loss. Sustainable development, community forestry, and co-management of protected areas are promising strategies to reverse mangrove losses, increasing the capacity of mangroves to support human-livelihoods and combat climate change.

1 September 2018 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KOKatherine R. O'BRien
Katherine R. O'BRien
MWMichelle Waycott
Michelle Waycott
PMPaul Maxwell
Paul Maxwell
GKGary Kendrick
Gary Kendrick
JUJames W. Udy
James W. Udy
WDWilliam C. Dennison
William C. Dennison

5 April 2013 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMegan I. Saunders
Megan I. Saunders
JLJavier Leon
Javier Leon
Stuart PhinnStuart Phinn
Stuart Phinn
DCDavid P. Callaghan
David P. Callaghan
KOKatherine R. O'Brien
Katherine R. O'Brien
PMPeter J. Mumby
Peter J. Mumby