Laurence Carvalho

Laurence Carvalho

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Laurence Carvalho

Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) Oslo Norway

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 August 2005 in Freshwater Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Erik JeppesenErik Jeppesen
Erik Jeppesen
Martin SøndergaardMartin Søndergaard
Martin Søndergaard
JJJens Peder Jensen
Jens Peder Jensen
KHKarl E. Havens
Karl E. Havens
OAOrlane Anneville
Orlane Anneville
MWMonika Winder
Monika Winder
Summary: 1. This synthesis examines 35 long‐term (5–35 years, mean: 16 years) lake re‐oligotrophication studies. It covers lakes ranging from shallow (mean depth <5 m and/or polymictic) to deep (mean depth up to 177 m), oligotrophic to hypertrophic (summer mean total phosphorus concentration from 7.5 to 3500 μg L−1 before loading reduction), subtropical to temperate (latitude: 28–65°), and lowland to upland (altitude: 0–481 m). Shallow north‐temperate lakes were most abundant.2. Reduction of external total phosphorus (TP) loading resulted in lower in‐lake TP concentration, lower chlorophyll a (chl a) concentration and higher Secchi depth in most lakes. Internal loading delayed the recovery, but in most lakes a new equilibrium for TP was reached after 10–15 years, which was only marginally influenced by the hydraulic retention time of the lakes. With decreasing TP concentration, the concentration of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) also declined substantially.3. Decreases (if any) in total nitrogen (TN) loading were lower than for TP in most lakes. As a result, the TN : TP ratio in lake water increased in 80% of the lakes. In lakes where the TN loading was reduced, the annual mean in‐lake TN concentration responded rapidly. Concentrations largely followed predictions derived from an empirical model developed earlier for Danish lakes, which includes external TN loading, hydraulic retention time and mean depth as explanatory variables.4. Phytoplankton clearly responded to reduced nutrient loading, mainly reflecting declining TP concentrations. Declines in phytoplankton biomass were accompanied by shifts in community structure. In deep lakes, chrysophytes and dinophytes assumed greater importance at the expense of cyanobacteria. Diatoms, cryptophytes and chrysophytes became more dominant in shallow lakes, while no significant change was seen for cyanobacteria.5. The observed declines in phytoplankton biomass and chl a may have been further augmented by enhanced zooplankton grazing, as indicated by increases in the zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio and declines in the chl a : TP ratio at a summer mean TP concentration of <100–150 μg L−1. This effect was strongest in shallow lakes. This implies potentially higher rates of zooplankton grazing and may be ascribed to the observed large changes in fish community structure and biomass with decreasing TP contribution. In 82% of the lakes for which data on fish are available, fish biomass declined with TP. The percentage of piscivores increased in 80% of those lakes and often a shift occurred towards dominance by fish species characteristic of less eutrophic waters.6. Data on macrophytes were available only for a small subsample of lakes. In several of those lakes, abundance, coverage, plant volume inhabited or depth distribution of submerged macrophytes increased during oligotrophication, but in others no changes were observed despite greater water clarity.7. Recovery of lakes after nutrient loading reduction may be confounded by concomitant environmental changes such as global warming. However, effects of global change are likely to run counter to reductions in nutrient loading rather than reinforcing re‐oligotrophication.

29 June 2016 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STStephen J. Thackeray
Stephen J. Thackeray
PHPeter A. Henrys
Peter A. Henrys
DHDeborah Hemming
Deborah Hemming
JBJames R. Bell
James R. Bell
MBMarc S. Botham
Marc S. Botham
SWSarah Wanless
Sarah Wanless

1 September 2010 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDaniel Hering
Daniel Hering
BABorja Angel
Borja Angel
JCJacob Carstensen
Jacob Carstensen
LCLaurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho
MEMichael Elliott
Michael Elliott
WBWouter Van De Bund
Wouter Van De Bund

3 November 2010 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STStephen J. Thackeray
Stephen J. Thackeray
TSTimothy H. Sparks
Timothy H. Sparks
MFMorten Frederiksen
Morten Frederiksen
SBSarah Burthe
Sarah Burthe
PBPhilip J. Bacon
Philip J. Bacon
SWSarah Wanless
Sarah Wanless
Recent changes in the seasonal timing (phenology) of familiar biological events have been one of the most conspicuous signs of climate change. However, the lack of a standardized approach to analysing change has hampered assessment of consistency in such changes among different taxa and trophic levels and across freshwater, terrestrial and marine environments. We present a standardized assessment of 25 532 rates of phenological change for 726 UK terrestrial, freshwater and marine taxa. The majority of spring and summer events have advanced, and more rapidly than previously documented. Such consistency is indicative of shared large scale drivers. Furthermore, average rates of change have accelerated in a way that is consistent with observed warming trends. Less coherent patterns in some groups of organisms point to the agency of more local scale processes and multiple drivers. For the first time we show a broad scale signal of differential phenological change among trophic levels; across environments advances in timing were slowest for secondary consumers, thus heightening the potential risk of temporal mismatch in key trophic interactions. If current patterns and rates of phenological change are indicative of future trends, future climate warming may exacerbate trophic mismatching, further disrupting the functioning, persistence and resilience of many ecosystems and having a major impact on ecosystem services.

15 June 2020 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sebastian BirkSebastian Birk
Sebastian Birk
DCDaniel Stephen Chapman
Daniel Stephen Chapman
LCLaurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho
BSBryan M. Spears
Bryan M. Spears
HAHans Estrup Andersen
Hans Estrup Andersen
DHDaniel Hering
Daniel Hering

1 March 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLaurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho
EMEleanor B. Mackay
Eleanor B. Mackay
ACAna Cristina Cardoso
Ana Cristina Cardoso
Annette Baattrup-PedersenAnnette Baattrup-Pedersen
Annette Baattrup-Pedersen
Sebastian BirkSebastian Birk
Sebastian Birk
ASAnne Lyche Solheim
Anne Lyche Solheim
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is a pioneering piece of legislation that aims to protect and enhance aquatic ecosystems and promote sustainable water use across Europe. There is growing concern that the objective of good status, or higher, in all EU waters by 2027 is a long way from being achieved in many countries. Through questionnaire analysis of almost 100 experts, we provide recommendations to enhance WFD monitoring and assessment systems, improve programmes of measures and further integrate with other sectoral policies. Our analysis highlights that there is great potential to enhance assessment schemes through strategic design of monitoring networks and innovation, such as earth observation. New diagnostic tools that use existing WFD monitoring data, but incorporate novel statistical and trait-based approaches could be used more widely to diagnose the cause of deterioration under conditions of multiple pressures and deliver a hierarchy of solutions for more evidence-driven decisions in river basin management. There is also a growing recognition that measures undertaken in river basin management should deliver multiple benefits across sectors, such as reduced flood risk, and there needs to be robust demonstration studies that evaluate these. Continued efforts in 'mainstreaming' water policy into other policy sectors is clearly needed to deliver wider success with WFD goals, particularly with agricultural policy. Other key policy areas where a need for stronger integration with water policy was recognised included urban planning (waste water treatment), flooding, climate and energy (hydropower). Having a deadline for attaining the policy objective of good status is important, but even more essential is to have a permanent framework for river basin management that addresses the delays in implementation of measures. This requires a long-term perspective, far beyond the current deadline of 2027.