Filipe Machado Franca

Filipe Machado Franca

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Filipe Machado Franca

School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
FFFilipe França
Filipe França
TGToby A. Gardner
Toby A. Gardner
CHChristina Hicks
Christina Hicks
GLGareth D. Lennox
Gareth D. Lennox
NGNicholas A. J. Graham
Nicholas A. J. Graham

15 November 2019 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
EBErika Berenguer
Erika Berenguer
RCRachel Carmenta
Rachel Carmenta
FFFilipe França
Filipe França
This article clarifies the different types of fire in the Amazon, their different drivers and the positive feedbacks that can lead to more fires in the region. It then explores evidence regarding the...

19 July 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBErika Berenguer
Erika Berenguer
GLGareth D. Lennox
Gareth D. Lennox
JFJoice Ferreira
Joice Ferreira
YMYadvinder Malhi
Yadvinder Malhi
LALuiz E. O. C. Aragão
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
With humanity facing an unprecedented climate crisis, the conservation of tropical forests has never been so important – their vast terrestrial carbon stocks can be turned into emissions by climatic and human disturbances. However, the duration of these effects is poorly understood, and it is unclear whether impacts are amplified in forests with a history of previous human disturbance. Here, we focus on the Amazonian epicenter of the 2015–16 El Niño, a region that encompasses 1.2% of the Brazilian Amazon. We quantify, at high temporal resolution, the impacts of an extreme El Niño (EN) drought and extensive forest fires on plant mortality and carbon loss in undisturbed and human-modified forests. Mortality remained higher than pre-El Niño levels for 36 mo in EN-drought–affected forests and for 30 mo in EN-fire–affected forests. In EN-fire–affected forests, human disturbance significantly increased plant mortality. Our investigation of the ecological and physiological predictors of tree mortality showed that trees with lower wood density, bark thickness and leaf nitrogen content, as well as those that experienced greater fire intensity, were more vulnerable. Across the region, the 2015–16 El Niño led to the death of an estimated 2.5 ± 0.3 billion stems, resulting in emissions of 495 ± 94 Tg CO2. Three years after the El Niño, plant growth and recruitment had offset only 37% of emissions. Our results show that limiting forest disturbance will not only help maintain carbon stocks, but will also maximize the resistance of Amazonian forests if fires do occur.* Significance Amazonia is experiencing an increase in the frequency of extreme droughts and wildfires. However, the duration of their impacts on plant mortality and carbon stocks are poorly known, and it is unclear whether impacts are amplified in forests with a history of previous human disturbance. We show that plant mortality rates remain above baseline levels for over 3 y in forests affected by drought and 2.5 y in forests affected by both drought and fire. A history of human disturbance led to greater plant mortality in forests simultaneously affected by drought and fire. Our assessment of an area covering 1.2% of the Brazilian Amazon shows that regional drought and fires can have globally relevant impacts on the world’s carbon balance.

11 December 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlec P. Christie
Alec P. Christie
DADavid Abecasis
David Abecasis
MAMehdi Adjeroud
Mehdi Adjeroud
JAJuan C. Alonso
Juan C. Alonso
TATatsuya Amano
Tatsuya Amano
WSWilliam J. Sutherland
William J. Sutherland
Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings. Researchers employ many different study designs that vary in their risk of bias to evaluate the true effect of interventions or impacts. Here, we empirically quantify, on a large scale, the prevalence of different study designs and the magnitude of bias in their estimates. Randomised designs and controlled observational designs with pre-intervention sampling were used by just 23% of intervention studies in biodiversity conservation, and 36% of intervention studies in social science. We demonstrate, through pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 environmental datasets, that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational designs. We propose a model-based approach to combine study estimates that may suffer from different levels of study design bias, discuss the implications for evidence synthesis, and how to facilitate the use of more credible study designs.

27 January 2020 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FFFilipe M. França
Filipe M. França
CBCassandra E. Benkwitt
Cassandra E. Benkwitt
GPGuadalupe Peralta
Guadalupe Peralta
JRJames P. W. Robinson
James P. W. Robinson
NGNicholas A. J. Graham
Nicholas A. J. Graham
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
Tropical forests and coral reefs host a disproportionately large share of global biodiversity and provide ecosystem functions and services used by millions of people. Yet, ongoing climate change is leading to an increase in frequency and magnitude of extreme climatic events in the tropics, which, in combination with other local human disturbances, is leading to unprecedented negative ecological consequences for tropical forests and coral reefs. Here, we provide an overview of how and where climate extremes are affecting the most biodiverse ecosystems on Earth and summarize how interactions between global, regional and local stressors are affecting tropical forest and coral reef systems through impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. We also discuss some key challenges and opportunities to promote mitigation and adaptation to a changing climate at local and global scales. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.

22 April 2016 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FFFilipe Machado Franca
Filipe Machado Franca
JLJulio Neil Louzada
Julio Neil Louzada
VKVanesca Korasaki
Vanesca Korasaki
HGHannah Griffiths
Hannah Griffiths
JSJuliana M. Silveira
Juliana M. Silveira
BBBernard Josiah Barlow
Bernard Josiah Barlow