Generative retrieval (GR) directly predicts the identifiers of relevant documents (i.e., docids) based on a parametric model. It has achieved solid performance on many ad-hoc retrieval tasks. So far, these tasks have assumed a static document collection. In many practical scenarios, however, document collections are dynamic, where new documents are continuously added to the corpus. The ability to incrementally index new documents while preserving the ability to answer queries with both previously and newly indexed relevant documents is vital to applying GR models. In this paper, we address this practical continual learning problem for GR. We put forward a novel Continual-LEarner for generatiVE Retrieval (CLEVER) model and make two major contributions to continual learning for GR: (i) To encode new documents into docids with low computational cost, we present Incremental Product Quantization, which updates a partial quantization codebook according to two adaptive thresholds; and (ii) To memorize new documents for querying without forgetting previous knowledge, we propose a memory-augmented learning mechanism, to form meaningful connections between old and new documents. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed model.

Knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILTs) typically require retrieving relevant documents from trustworthy corpora, e.g., Wikipedia, to produce specific answers. Very recently, a pre-trained generative retrieval model for KILTs, named CorpusBrain, was proposed and reached new state-of-the-art retrieval performance. However, most research on KILTs, including CorpusBrain, has predominantly focused on a static document collection, overlooking the dynamic nature of real-world scenarios, where new documents are continuously being incorporated into the source corpus. To address this gap, it is crucial to explore the capability of retrieval models to effectively handle the dynamic retrieval scenario inherent in KILTs. In this work, we first introduce the continual document learning (CDL) task for KILTs and build a novel benchmark dataset named KILT++ based on the original KILT dataset for evaluation. Then, we conduct a comprehensive study of the use of pre-trained CorpusBrain on KILT++. Unlike the promising results in the stationary scenario, CorpusBrain is prone to catastrophic forgetting in the dynamic scenario, hence hampering retrieval performance. To alleviate this issue, we propose CorpusBrain++, a continual generative pre-training framework that enhances the original model along two key dimensions: (i) We employ a backbone-adapter architecture: the dynamic adapter is learned for each downstream KILT task via task-specific pre-training objectives; the backbone parameters that are task-shared are kept unchanged to offer foundational retrieval capacity. (ii) We use an experience replay strategy based on exemplar documents that are similar to new documents, to prevent catastrophic forgetting of old documents. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of CorpusBrain++ in comparison to both traditional and generative information retrieval methods.

Community Question Answering (CQA) sites such as Yahoo! Answers and Baidu Knows have emerged as rich knowledge resources for information seekers. However, answers posted to CQA sites often vary a lot in their qualities. User votes from the community may partially reflect the overall quality of the answer, but they are often missing. Hence, automatic selection of "good'' answers becomes a practical research problem that will help us manage the quality of accumulated knowledge. Without loss of generality, a good answer should deliver not only relevant but also trustworthy information that can help resolve the information needs of the posted question, but the latter has received less investigation in the past. In this paper, we propose a novel matching-verification framework for automatic answer selection. The matching component assesses the relevance of a candidate answer to a given question as conventional QA methods. The major enhancement is the verification component, which aims to leverage the wisdom of crowds, e.g., some big information repository, for trustworthiness measurement. Given a question, we take the top retrieved results from the information repository as the supporting evidences to distill the consensus representation. A major challenge is that there is no guarantee that one can always obtain reliable consensus from the wisdom of crowds for a question due to the noisy nature and the limitation of the existing search technology.Therefore, we decompose the trustworthiness measurement into two parts, i.e., a verification score which measures the consistency between a candidate answer and the consensus representation, and a confidence score which measures the reliability of the consensus itself. Empirical studies on three real-world CQA data collections, i.e. YahooQA, QuoraQA and AmazonQA, show that our approach can significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods on the answer selection task.