Claudia Friess

Claudia Friess

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Claudia Friess

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg Florida USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2023 in Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSusan K. Lowerre‐Barbieri
Susan K. Lowerre‐Barbieri
NBNancy J. Brown-Peterson
Nancy J. Brown-Peterson
DWDavid M. Wyanski
David M. Wyanski
HMHeather E. Moncrief‐Cox
Heather E. Moncrief‐Cox
KKKevin J. Kolmos
Kevin J. Kolmos
CFClaudia Friess
Claudia Friess
Objective: This paper highlights the complexity of marine fish spawner–recruit systems and how they vary across species and ecosystems while providing a universal terminology and framework to evaluate fish reproduction. We emphasize the gonadal development important to assess maturity, fecundity, where and when fish spawn, and transition and sex assignment in protogynous species.Methods: We review and compare reproductive traits in warmwater and coldwater fishes. Reproductive phases for both sexes and protogynous species are defined and histological micrographs presented. New methods are developed to assess maturity; spawning seasonality; peak spawning; and, for protogynous species, sex assignment.Result: Protogyny, extended spawning seasons, and indeterminate fecundity are more common in warmwater than coldwater systems. The following reproductive phases are defined as immature, transitional (sex change), early developing (the first stage of entrainment in the reproductive cycle), late developing (stages needed to complete maturational competence), spawning, regressing (spawning season termination), and regenerating (fish that are mature but outside of the spawning season). A method to assess the certainty of maturity assignment based on reproductive phase and the age and size range sampled is presented, as are best practices to estimate size and age at maturity. To remove the subjectivity from current methods to estimate spawning seasonality, we present a new quantitative method to identify the core spawning season and peak spawning months.Conclusion: A species’ ability to adapt to fishing and climate change varies with their reproductive strategy. Improving our understanding of fish reproduction necessitates standardizing methodology and terminology.

8 April 2026 in Fisheries Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CFClaudia Friess
Claudia Friess
EAEric C. Anderson
Eric C. Anderson
LALisa E. Ailloud
Lisa E. Ailloud
DPDavid S. Portnoy
David S. Portnoy
SLSusan K. Lowerre-Barbieri
Susan K. Lowerre-Barbieri