Amber Kaye Parker

Amber Kaye Parker

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Amber Kaye Parker

Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2011 in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APA.K. Parker
A.K. Parker
ICI.G. DE Cortázar-Atauri
I.G. DE Cortázar-Atauri
CLCornelis van Leeuwen
Cornelis van Leeuwen
ICI. Chuine
I. Chuine

27 January 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IMIgnacio Morales-Castilla
Ignacio Morales-Castilla
ICIñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri
Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri
BCBenjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook
TLThierry Lacombe
Thierry Lacombe
APAmber Parker
Amber Parker
EWElizabeth M. Wolkovich
Elizabeth M. Wolkovich
Agrobiodiversity—the variation within agricultural plants, animals, and practices—is often suggested as a way to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on crops [S. A. Woodet al.,Trends Ecol. Evol.30, 531–539 (2015)]. Recently, increasing research and attention has focused on exploiting the intraspecific genetic variation within a crop [Hajjaret al.,Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.123, 261–270 (2008)], despite few relevant tests of how this diversity modifies agricultural forecasts. Here, we quantify how intraspecific diversity, via cultivars, changes global projections of growing areas. We focus on a crop that spans diverse climates, has the necessary records, and is clearly impacted by climate change: winegrapes (predominantlyVitis viniferasubspeciesvinifera). We draw on long-term French records to extrapolate globally for 11 cultivars (varieties) with high diversity in a key trait for climate change adaptation—phenology. We compared scenarios where growers shift to more climatically suitable cultivars as the climate warms or do not change cultivars. We find that cultivar diversity more than halved projected losses of current winegrowing areas under a 2 °C warming scenario, decreasing areas lost from 56 to 24%. These benefits are more muted at higher warming scenarios, reducing areas lost by a third at 4 °C (85% versus 58%). Our results support the potential of in situ shifting of cultivars to adapt agriculture to climate change—including in major winegrowing regions—as long as efforts to avoid higher warming scenarios are successful.

1 October 2013 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAmber Parker
Amber Parker
ICInaki Garcia de Cortázar-Atauri
Inaki Garcia de Cortázar-Atauri
ICIsabelle Chuine
Isabelle Chuine
GBGérard Barbeau
Gérard Barbeau
BBBenjamin Bois
Benjamin Bois
CLCornelis van Leeuwen
Cornelis van Leeuwen

5 July 2011 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAmber Parker
Amber Parker
SCSarah L. Cuddihy
Sarah L. Cuddihy
TSTae G. Son
Tae G. Son
MVMargreet C.M. Vissers
Margreet C.M. Vissers
CWChristine Winterbourn
Christine Winterbourn

3 March 2015 in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APA.K. Parker
A.K. Parker
RHRainer Hofmann
Rainer Hofmann
CLCornelis van Leeuwen
Cornelis van Leeuwen
AMA.R.G. McLachlan
A.R.G. McLachlan
MTM.C.T. Trought
M.C.T. Trought

22 September 2014 in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APA.K. Parker
A.K. Parker
RHRainer Hofmann
Rainer Hofmann
CLCornelis van Leeuwen
Cornelis van Leeuwen
AMA.R.G. McLachlan
A.R.G. McLachlan
MTM.C.T. Trought
M.C.T. Trought