Jinmeng Li

Jinmeng Li

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Jinmeng Li

Department of Biomaterials, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, the Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2020 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJinmeng Li
Jinmeng Li
JJJohn A. Jansen
John A. Jansen
XWX. Frank Walboomers
X. Frank Walboomers
JBJeroen Van Den Beucken
Jeroen Van Den Beucken

1 May 2019 in Materials Science and Engineering: C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJinlong Shao
Jinlong Shao
BWBing Wang
Bing Wang
JLJinmeng Li
Jinmeng Li
JJJohn Jansen
John Jansen
XWX. Frank Walboomers
X. Frank Walboomers
FYFang Yang
Fang Yang

14 January 2020 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEvy Aerts
Evy Aerts
JLJinmeng Li
Jinmeng Li
MSMies J. Van Steenbergen
Mies J. Van Steenbergen
TDTanika Degrande
Tanika Degrande
JJJohn A. Jansen
John A. Jansen
XWX. Frank Walboomers
X. Frank Walboomers
Porous titanium fiber mesh (TFM) is considered a suitable scaffold material for bone reconstruction. Also, TFM can be used to cover the surface of bone‐anchored devices, that is, orthopedic or dental implants. The titanium fiber size has an effect of the stiffness as well as porosity of the titanium mesh, which can influence the behavior of bone forming cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to vary TFM composition, in order to achieve different stiffness, and to assess the effects of such variation on the behavior of bone marrow‐derived stromal cells (BMSCs). With that purpose, nine types of TFM (porosities 60–87%; fiber size 22–50 μm), were examined for their mechanical properties as well as their effect on the proliferation and differentiation of rat bone marrow‐derived stromal cells (rBMSCs) up to 21 days. Dynamic mechanical analysis revealed that the stiffness of TFM were lower than of solid titanium and decreased with larger fiber sizes. The stiffness could effectively be tailored by altering fiber properties, which altered the pore simultaneously. For the 22 and 35 μm size fiber meshes with the highest porosity, the stiffness closely matched the value found in literature for cortical bone. Finally, all tested TFM types supported the growth and differentiation of rBMSCs. We concluded that TFM material has been proven cytocompatible. Further preclinical studies are needed to assess which TFM type is most suitable as clinical use for bone ingrowth and bone regeneration.