Background: Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the USA. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods: This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 h of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 h will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient-reported quality of life measures. Discussion: In vitro and in vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04217551. Registered on 30 December 2019.

Background: The number of migrants and asylum seekers at the Mexico-US border has increased to historic levels. Our objective was to determine the medical diagnoses and treatments of migrating people seeking care in humanitarian clinics in Matamoros, Mexico.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patient encounters by migrating people through a humanitarian clinic in Matamoros, Mexico, from November 22, 2019, to March 18, 2021. The clinics were operated by Global Response Medicine in concert with local non-governmental organizations. Clinical encounters were each coded to the appropriate ICD-10/CPT code and categorized according to organ system. We categorized medications using the WHO List of Essential Medicines and used multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between demographic variables and condition frequency.Results: We found a total of 8,156 clinical encounters, which included 9,744 diagnoses encompassing 132 conditions (median age 26.8 years, female sex 58.2%). People originated from 24 countries, with the majority from Central America (n = 5598, 68.6%). The most common conditions were respiratory (n = 1466, 15.0%), musculoskeletal (n = 1081, 11.1%), and skin diseases (n = 473, 4.8%). Children were at higher risk for respiratory disease (aOR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.61–2.10), while older adults had greater risk for joint disorders (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.73–6.02). Women had decreased risk for injury (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40–0.63) and higher risk for genitourinary diseases (aOR = 4.99, 95% CI: 3.72–6.85) compared with men. Among 10,405 medications administered, analgesics were the most common (n = 3190, 30.7%) followed by anti-infectives (n = 2175, 21.1%).Conclusions: In this large study of a migrating population at the Mexico-US border, we found a variety of clinical conditions, with respiratory, musculoskeletal, and skin illnesses the most common in this study period which encompassed a period of restrictive immigration policy and the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Intranasal insulin is a putative neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest, but safety in humans at doses extrapolated from animal models is unknown. This phase I, open‐label adaptive dose‐escalation study explores the maximum tolerated dose of intranasal insulin in healthy human participants. Placebo or insulin at doses from 0 to 1000 units was given to healthy participants intranasally on repeated weekly visits. Serum glucose, insulin, and C‐peptide levels were measured serially at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration. Twenty‐four participants (12 female, median age 53, IQR 35–61) were enrolled. There was minimal change in average serum glucose after administration of intranasal insulin. Average serum insulin increased slightly in a dose‐dependent manner, reaching maximum concentrations at 15 min. C‐peptide decreased over time from administration in all groups. One participant had severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL at 45 min) and a different participant had mild hypoglycemia (51 mg/dL at 30 min), both after receiving 600 U intranasal insulin. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with increases in serum insulin. Both participants continued in the study without hypoglycemia after additional doses. High‐dose intranasal insulin up to 1000 U was generally well tolerated, with minimal measurable systemic absorption and without significant aggregate changes in mean glucose. Idiosyncratic episodic systemic absorption and hypoglycemia require further study and additional caution in potential clinical application. Further study of its target engagement and efficacy as a neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest at these doses is warranted.

Background Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 hours of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 hours will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient reported quality of life measures. Discussion In-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217551, 2019-12-30).

Background/Introduction: Meaningful medical data are crucial for response teams in the aftermath of disaster. Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems have revolutionized healthcare by facilitating real-time data collection, storage, and analysis. These capabilities are particularly relevant for post-disaster and austere environments. fEMR, an EMR system designed for such settings, enables rapid documentation of patient information, treatments, and outcomes, ensuring critical data capture. Objectives: Data collected through fEMR can be leveraged to perform comprehensive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of emergency medical services, assess operational needs and efficiency, and support public health syndromic surveillance. Method/Description: Analyzing these data identifies patterns and trends or assesses treatment effectiveness. This insight facilitates data-driven decision-making and the optimization of medical protocols. fEMR’s real-time reports enhance situational awareness and operational coordination among response units. The aggregated data can detect trends, classify case-mix, and facilitate after-action reviews, contributing to continuous improvement in emergency preparedness and response strategies. The system also supports fulfilling reporting requirements for health agencies and funding organizations, ensuring accountability and transparency. Results/Outcomes: EMRs like fEMR are vital for emergency response teams, supporting immediate patient care and ongoing M&E of disaster response efforts. Its robust data management capabilities support evidence-based practices and strategic planning, improving the effectiveness of emergency medical services in disaster scenarios. Conclusion: The effective use of fEMR in disaster response scenarios highlights its significance in enhancing operational efficiency, ensuring accountability, and improving the overall effectiveness of emergency medical services through comprehensive data management and real-time reporting.