Travis L. DeVault

Travis L. DeVault

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Travis L. DeVault

University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Aiken SC USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 July 2003 in Oikos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTravis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault
JRJr. Olin E. Rhodes
Jr. Olin E. Rhodes
JSJohn A. Shivik
John A. Shivik

1 May 2009 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDavid J. Glista
David J. Glista
TDTravis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault
JDJ. Andrew DeWoody
J. Andrew DeWoody

1 January 2011 in Ornithology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDaniel G. Wenny
Daniel G. Wenny
TDTravis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault
MJMatthew D. Johnson
Matthew D. Johnson
DKDave Kelly
Dave Kelly
CSCagan H. Sekercioglu
Cagan H. Sekercioglu
CWChristopher J Whelan
Christopher J Whelan

11 September 2018 in Ecological Monographs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBM. Eric Benbow
M. Eric Benbow
PBPhilip S. Barton
Philip S. Barton
MUMichael D. Ulyshen
Michael D. Ulyshen
JBJames C. Beasley
James C. Beasley
TDTravis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault
JPJennifer L. Pechal
Jennifer L. Pechal
Decomposition contributes to global ecosystem function by contributing to nutrient recycling, energy flow, and limiting biomass accumulation. The decomposer organisms influencing this process form diverse, complex, and highly dynamic communities that often specialize on different plant or animal resources. Despite performing the same net role, there is a need to conceptually synthesize information on the structure and function of decomposer communities across the spectrum of dead plant and animal resources. A lack of synthesis has limited cross‐disciplinary learning and research in important areas of ecosystem and community ecology. Here we expound on the “necrobiome” concept and develop a framework describing the decomposer communities and their interactions associated with plant and animal resource types within multiple ecosystems. We outline the biotic structure and ecological functions of the necrobiome, along with how the necrobiome fits into a broader landscape and ecosystem context. The expanded necrobiome model provides a set of perspectives on decomposer communities across resource types, and conceptually unifies plant and animal decomposer communities into the same framework, while acknowledging key differences in processes and mechanisms. This framework is intended to raise awareness among researchers, and advance the construction of explicit, mechanistic hypotheses that further our understanding of decomposer community contributions to biodiversity, the structure and function of ecosystems, global nutrient recycling and energy flow.

30 January 2019 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJacob E. Hill
Jacob E. Hill
TDTravis L. DeVault
Travis L. DeVault
JBJerrold L. Belant
Jerrold L. Belant

1 March 2004 in Canadian Journal of Zoology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTravis L DeVault
Travis L DeVault
JBJr. I Lehr Brisbin
Jr. I Lehr Brisbin
JRJr. Olin E Rhodes
Jr. Olin E Rhodes
Vertebrate scavengers and decomposers compete for animal carcasses in all temperate and tropical ecosystems. We examined the influence of carcass size, forest type, and air temperature on the fate of rodent carcasses at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA. Three hundred rodent carcasses were placed at random locations in forested habitats and scavengers were identified using remote photography. Seventeen species of vertebrates removed 104 of 300 (35%) rodent carcasses over a year. Raccoons (Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758)) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana Kerr, 1792) scavenged most frequently. For scavenged carcasses, the mean time to carcass removal was 2.58 days after placement. Carcass acquisition by scavengers and decomposers was influenced moderately by forest type and carcass size, although ambient air temperature considerably influenced the fate of carcasses. Vertebrates removed fewer carcasses as temperatures increased: only 28 of 144 (19%) carcasses were scavenged when temperatures exceeded 17 °C. The temporal pattern of carcass removal by vertebrates, however, did not vary with temperature. Consistent rates of carcass removal by vertebrates across the year and increased activity by insects during warm weather led to elevated levels of decomposition during summer months. This study confirms the complexity and dynamic nature of competitive relationships among scavengers and decomposers.