Stephen D. Eckermann

Stephen D. Eckermann

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Stephen D. Eckermann

Space Science Division U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2010 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAM. J. Alexander
M. J. Alexander
MGM. Geller
M. Geller
CMC. McLandress
C. McLandress
SPS. Polavarapu
S. Polavarapu
PPP. Preusse
P. Preusse
SWS. Watanabe
S. Watanabe
Recent observational and theoretical studies of the global properties of small‐scale atmospheric gravity waves have highlighted the global effects of these waves on the circulation from the surface to the middle atmosphere. The effects of gravity waves on the large‐scale circulation have long been treated via parametrizations in both climate and weather‐forecasting applications. In these parametrizations, key parameters describe the global distributions of gravity‐wave momentum flux, wavelengths and frequencies. Until recently, global observations could not define the required parameters because the waves are small in scale and intermittent in occurrence. Recent satellite and other global datasets with improved resolution, along with innovative analysis methods, are now providing constraints for the parametrizations that can improve the treatment of these waves in climate‐prediction models. Research using very‐high‐resolution global models has also recently demonstrated the capability to resolve gravity waves and their circulation effects, and when tested against observations these models show some very realistic properties. Here we review recent studies on gravity‐wave effects in stratosphere‐resolving climate models, recent observations and analysis methods that reveal global patterns in gravity‐wave momentum fluxes and results of very‐high‐resolution model studies, and we outline some future research requirements to improve the treatment of these waves in climate simulations. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society and Crown in the right of Canada

1 September 2014 in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
THTimothy Hogan
Timothy Hogan
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
JRJames Ridout
James Ridout
MPMelinda Peng
Melinda Peng
TWTimothy Whitcomb
Timothy Whitcomb
SCSimon Chang
Simon Chang

1 June 1995 in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCrispin J. Marks
Crispin J. Marks
SEStephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann
The WKB ray-tracing formalism is extended to accommodate internal gravity waves of all frequencies in a rotating, stratified, and compressible three-dimensional atmosphere. This includes the derivation of equations governing the dispersion and refraction of the ray paths, a realistic wave amplitude equation that takes into account both radiative and turbulent damping effects, and extensions of previous wave saturation schemes to accommodate dynamical and convective instabilities along generally slanted axes. These equations have been numerically coded into a global ray-tracing model that the authors have applied to the three-dimensional CIRA 1986 reference atmosphere model in a series of preliminary experiments to investigate the impact of the newly incorporated features on synthesized wave fields in the middle atmosphere. Three main points emerge from these experiments. First, there is a striking reduction in the high-frequency cutoff with decreasing horizontal wavenumber due to a more complete ... Abstract The WKB ray-tracing formalism is extended to accommodate internal gravity waves of all frequencies in a rotating, stratified, and compressible three-dimensional atmosphere. This includes the derivation of equations governing the dispersion and refraction of the ray paths, a realistic wave amplitude equation that takes into account both radiative and turbulent damping effects, and extensions of previous wave saturation schemes to accommodate dynamical and convective instabilities along generally slanted axes. These equations have been numerically coded into a global ray-tracing model that the authors have applied to the three-dimensional CIRA 1986 reference atmosphere model in a series of preliminary experiments to investigate the impact of the newly incorporated features on synthesized wave fields in the middle atmosphere. Three main points emerge from these experiments. First, there is a striking reduction in the high-frequency cutoff with decreasing horizontal wavenumber due to a more complete ...

18 July 2014 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OTOm P. Tripathi
Om P. Tripathi
MBMark Baldwin
Mark Baldwin
ACAndrew Charlton‐Perez
Andrew Charlton‐Perez
MCMartin Charron
Martin Charron
SEStephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann
SSSeok‐Woo Son
Seok‐Woo Son
Extreme variability of the winter‐ and spring‐time stratospheric polar vortex has been shown to affect extratropical tropospheric weather. Therefore, reducing stratospheric forecast error may be one way to improve the skill of tropospheric weather forecasts. In this review, the basis for this idea is examined. A range of studies of different stratospheric extreme vortex events shows that they can be skilfully forecasted beyond 5 days and into the sub‐seasonal range (0–30 days) in some cases. Separate studies show that typical errors in forecasting a stratospheric extreme vortex event can alter tropospheric forecast skill by 5–7% in the extratropics on sub‐seasonal time‐scales. Thus understanding what limits stratospheric predictability is of significant interest to operational forecasting centres. Both limitations in forecasting tropospheric planetary waves and stratospheric model biases have been shown to be important in this context.

1 March 2016 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DFDavid Fritts
David Fritts
RSRonald B. Smith
Ronald B. Smith
MTMichael J. Taylor
Michael J. Taylor
JDJames D. Doyle
James D. Doyle
SEStephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann
JMJun Ma
Jun Ma
The Deep Propagating Gravity Wave Experiment (DEEPWAVE) was designed to quantify gravity wave (GW) dynamics and effects from orographic and other sources to regions of dissipation at high altitudes. The core DEEPWAVE field phase took place from May through July 2014 using a comprehensive suite of airborne and ground-based instruments providing measurements from Earth’s surface to ∼100 km. Austral winter was chosen to observe deep GW propagation to high altitudes. DEEPWAVE was based on South Island, New Zealand, to provide access to the New Zealand and Tasmanian “hotspots” of GW activity and additional GW sources over the Southern Ocean and Tasman Sea. To observe GWs up to ∼100 km, DEEPWAVE utilized three new instruments built specifically for the National Science Foundation (NSF)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Gulfstream V (GV): a Rayleigh lidar, a sodium resonance lidar, and an advanced mesosphere temperature mapper. These measurements were supplemented by in situ probes, dropsondes, and a microwave temperature profiler on the GV and by in situ probes and a Doppler lidar aboard the German DLR Falcon. Extensive ground-based instrumentation and radiosondes were deployed on South Island, Tasmania, and Southern Ocean islands. Deep orographic GWs were a primary target but multiple flights also observed deep GWs arising from deep convection, jet streams, and frontal systems. Highlights include the following: 1) strong orographic GW forcing accompanying strong cross-mountain flows, 2) strong high-altitude responses even when orographic forcing was weak, 3) large-scale GWs at high altitudes arising from jet stream sources, and 4) significant flight-level energy fluxes and often very large momentum fluxes at high altitudes.

27 April 2009 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPeter Preusse
Peter Preusse
SEStephen D. Eckermann
Stephen D. Eckermann
MEManfred Ern
Manfred Ern
JOJens Oberheide
Jens Oberheide
RPRichard H. Picard
Richard H. Picard
MMMartin G. Mlynczak
Martin G. Mlynczak