Sandrine Bony

Sandrine Bony

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Sandrine Bony

LMD / IPSL, CNRS, Sorbonne University, 4 place Jussieu, Paris F75252 Cedex 05, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 May 2016 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VEVeronika Eyring
Veronika Eyring
SBSandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony
GMGerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl
CSCatherine A. Senior
Catherine A. Senior
BSBjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens
KTKarl E. Taylor
Karl E. Taylor
By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current, and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and CMIP historical simulations (1850–near present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP; (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure, and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble; and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and CMIP historical simulations to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP historical simulations, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. Participation in CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs by individual modelling groups will be at their own discretion and will depend on their scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: – How does the Earth system respond to forcing? – What are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases? – How can we assess future climate changes given internal climate variability, predictability, and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.

20 July 2020 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOlivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher
JSJérôme Servonnat
Jérôme Servonnat
AAAnna Lea Albright
Anna Lea Albright
OAOlivier Aumont
Olivier Aumont
YBYves Balkanski
Yves Balkanski
NVNicolas Vuichard
Nicolas Vuichard
This study presents the global climate model IPSL‐CM6A‐LR developed at IPSL to study natural climate variability and climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This article describes the different model components, their coupling, and the simulated climate in comparison to previous model versions. We focus here on the representation of the physical climate along with the main characteristics of the global carbon cycle. The model's climatology, as assessed from a range of metrics (related in particular to radiation, temperature, precipitation, wind), is strongly improved in comparison to previous model versions. Although they are reduced, a number of known biases and shortcomings (e.g., double ITCZ, frequency of midlatitude wintertime blockings, and ENSO dynamics) persist. The equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response have both increased from the previous climate model IPSL‐CM5A‐LR used in CMIP5. A large ensemble of more than 30 members for the historical period (1850‐2018) and a smaller ensemble for a range of emissions scenarios (until 2100 and 2300) are also presented and discussed.

24 February 2013 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJ.-L. Dufresne
J.-L. Dufresne
MFM.-A. Foujols
M.-A. Foujols
SDS. Denvil
S. Denvil
ACA. Caubel
A. Caubel
OMO. Marti
O. Marti
NVN. Vuichard
N. Vuichard
We present the global general circulation model IPSL-CM5 developed to study the long-term response of the climate system to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the 5th Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). This model includes an interactive carbon cycle, a representation of tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, and a comprehensive representation of aerosols. As it represents the principal dynamical, physical, and bio-geochemical processes relevant to the climate system, it may be referred to as an Earth System Model. However, the IPSL-CM5 model may be used in a multitude of configurations associated with different boundary conditions and with a range of complexities in terms of processes and interactions. This paper presents an overview of the different model components and explains how they were coupled and used to simulate historical climate changes over the past 150 years and different scenarios of future climate change. A single version of the IPSL-CM5 model (IPSL-CM5A-LR) was used to provide climate projections associated with different socio-economic scenarios, including the different Representative Concentration Pathways considered by CMIP5 and several scenarios from the Special Report on Emission Scenarios considered by CMIP3. Results suggest that the magnitude of global warming projections primarily depends on the socio-economic scenario considered, that there is potential for an aggressive mitigation policy to limit global warming to about two degrees, and that the behavior of some components of the climate system such as the Arctic sea ice and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation may change drastically by the end of the twenty-first century in the case of a no climate policy scenario. Although the magnitude of regional temperature and precipitation changes depends fairly linearly on the magnitude of the projected global warming (and thus on the scenario considered), the geographical pattern of these changes is strikingly similar for the different scenarios. The representation of atmospheric physical processes in the model is shown to strongly influence the simulated climate variability and both the magnitude and pattern of the projected climate changes.

26 October 2005 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony
JDJean‐Louis Dufresne
Jean‐Louis Dufresne

31 March 2015 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony
BSBjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens
DFDargan M. W. Frierson
Dargan M. W. Frierson
CJChristian Jakob
Christian Jakob
MKMasa Kageyama
Masa Kageyama
MWMark J. Webb
Mark J. Webb

8 August 2006 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FHFrédéric Hourdin
Frédéric Hourdin
IMIonela Musat
Ionela Musat
SBSandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony
PBPascale Braconnot
Pascale Braconnot
FCFrancis Codron
Francis Codron
FLFrançois Lott
François Lott