Neal Butchart

Neal Butchart

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Neal Butchart

Met Office Hadley Centre (MOHC), Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2014 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNeal Butchart
Neal Butchart
One of the more robust results of greenhouse gas-induced climate change to emerge from chemistry-climate and climate model projections in the last decade is, depending on the greenhouse gas scenario, an ∼2.0–3.2% per decade acceleration of the global mass circulation of tropospheric air through the stratosphere. This circulation is generally known as the Brewer-Dobson circulation and is characterized by tropospheric air rising into the stratosphere in the Tropics, moving poleward before descending in the middle and high latitudes. The circulation is, however, poorly constrained by observations, and many fundamental questions about it remain. In this review, historical developments in observations, theory, and models describing the Brewer-Dobson circulation are presented along with a reexamination of the basis of the current understanding of the Brewer-Dobson circulation and the mechanisms driving it and its response to climate change. Impacts of anthropogenically driven changes in the Brewer-Dobson circulation are also reviewed.

18 May 2015 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJoseph Kidston
Joseph Kidston
ASAdam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife
SHSteven C. Hardiman
Steven C. Hardiman
DMDann Mitchell
Dann Mitchell
NBNeal Butchart
Neal Butchart
LGLesley J. Gray
Lesley J. Gray

8 January 2021 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMark P. Baldwin
Mark P. Baldwin
BABlanca Ayarzaguena
Blanca Ayarzaguena
TBThomas Birner
Thomas Birner
NBNeal Butchart
Neal Butchart
ABAmy Butler
Amy Butler
NPNicholas Pedatella
Nicholas Pedatella

16 August 2006 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NBN. Butchart
N. Butchart
ASA. A. Scaife
A. A. Scaife
MBM. Bourqui
M. Bourqui
JGJ. de Grandpré
J. de Grandpré
SHS. H. E. Hare
S. H. E. Hare
MSM. Sigmond
M. Sigmond

15 October 2010 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NBNeal Butchart
Neal Butchart
ICI. Cionni
I. Cionni
VEV. Eyring
V. Eyring
TST. G. Shepherd
T. G. Shepherd
DWD. W. Waugh
D. W. Waugh
WTW. Tian
W. Tian
The response of stratospheric climate and circulation to increasing amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and ozone recovery in the twenty-first century is analyzed in simulations of 11 chemistry–climate models using near-identical forcings and experimental setup. In addition to an overall global cooling of the stratosphere in the simulations (0.59 ± 0.07 K decade−1 at 10 hPa), ozone recovery causes a warming of the Southern Hemisphere polar lower stratosphere in summer with enhanced cooling above. The rate of warming correlates with the rate of ozone recovery projected by the models and, on average, changes from 0.8 to 0.48 K decade−1 at 100 hPa as the rate of recovery declines from the first to the second half of the century. In the winter northern polar lower stratosphere the increased radiative cooling from the growing abundance of GHGs is, in most models, balanced by adiabatic warming from stronger polar downwelling. In the Antarctic lower stratosphere the models simulate an increase in low temperature extremes required for polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) formation, but the positive trend is decreasing over the twenty-first century in all models. In the Arctic, none of the models simulates a statistically significant increase in Arctic PSCs throughout the twenty-first century. The subtropical jets accelerate in response to climate change and the ozone recovery produces a westward acceleration of the lower-stratospheric wind over the Antarctic during summer, though this response is sensitive to the rate of recovery projected by the models. There is a strengthening of the Brewer–Dobson circulation throughout the depth of the stratosphere, which reduces the mean age of air nearly everywhere at a rate of about 0.05 yr decade−1 in those models with this diagnostic. On average, the annual mean tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere (∼70 hPa) increases by almost 2% decade−1, with 59% of this trend forced by the parameterized orographic gravity wave drag in the models. This is a consequence of the eastward acceleration of the subtropical jets, which increases the upward flux of (parameterized) momentum reaching the lower stratosphere in these latitudes.

3 March 2011 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBN. Butchart
N. Butchart
ACA. J. Charlton-Perez
A. J. Charlton-Perez
ICI. Cionni
I. Cionni
SHS. C. Hardiman
S. C. Hardiman
PHP. H. Haynes
P. H. Haynes
YYY. Yamashita
Y. Yamashita
[1] The stratospheric climate and variability from simulations of sixteen chemistry‐climate models is evaluated. On average the polar night jet is well reproduced though its variability is less well reproduced with a large spread between models. Polar temperature biases are less than 5 K except in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) lower stratosphere in spring. The accumulated area of low temperatures responsible for polar stratospheric cloud formation is accurately reproduced for the Antarctic but underestimated for the Arctic. The shape and position of the polar vortex is well simulated, as is the tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere. There is a wide model spread in the frequency of major sudden stratospheric warnings (SSWs), late biases in the breakup of the SH vortex, and a weak annual cycle in the zonal wind in the tropical upper stratosphere. Quantitatively, “metrics” indicate a wide spread in model performance for most diagnostics with systematic biases in many, and poorer performance in the SH than in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Correlations were found in the SH between errors in the final warming, polar temperatures, the leading mode of variability, and jet strength, and in the NH between errors in polar temperatures, frequency of major SSWs, and jet strength. Models with a stronger QBO have stronger tropical upwelling and a colder NH vortex. Both the qualitative and quantitative analysis indicate a number of common and long‐standing model problems, particularly related to the simulation of the SH and stratospheric variability.