Michael L. Banner

Michael L. Banner

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Michael L. Banner

University of New South Wales

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

54Years (1973-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 1994 in Journal of Physical Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPeter D. Craig
Peter D. Craig
MBMichael L. Banner
Michael L. Banner
Until recently, measurements below the ocean surface have tended to confirm “law of the wall” behavior, in which the velocity profile is logarithmic, and energy dissipation decays inversely with depth. Recent measurements, however, show a sublayer, within meters of the surface, in which turbulence is enhanced by the action of surface waves. In this layer, dissipation appears to decay with inverse depth raised to a power estimated between 3 and 4.6. The present study shows that a conventional model, employing a “level 2½” turbulence closure scheme predicts near-surface dissipation decaying as inverse depth to the power 3.4. The model shows agreement in detail with measured profiles of dissipation. This is despite the fact that empirical constants in the model are determined for situations very different from this near-surface application. The action of breaking waves is modeled by a turbulent kinetic energy input at the surface. In the wave-enhanced layer, the downward flux of turbulent kinetic en... Abstract Until recently, measurements below the ocean surface have tended to confirm “law of the wall” behavior, in which the velocity profile is logarithmic, and energy dissipation decays inversely with depth. Recent measurements, however, show a sublayer, within meters of the surface, in which turbulence is enhanced by the action of surface waves. In this layer, dissipation appears to decay with inverse depth raised to a power estimated between 3 and 4.6. The present study shows that a conventional model, employing a “level 2½” turbulence closure scheme predicts near-surface dissipation decaying as inverse depth to the power 3.4. The model shows agreement in detail with measured profiles of dissipation. This is despite the fact that empirical constants in the model are determined for situations very different from this near-surface application. The action of breaking waves is modeled by a turbulent kinetic energy input at the surface. In the wave-enhanced layer, the downward flux of turbulent kinetic en...

1 December 2007 in Progress in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLuigi Cavaleri
Luigi Cavaleri
JAJ.-H.G.M. Alves
J.-H.G.M. Alves
FAF. Ardhuin
F. Ardhuin
ABAlexander Babanin
Alexander Babanin
MBM. Banner
M. Banner
Ian YoungIan Young
Ian Young

22 October 1976 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. L. Banner
M. L. Banner
WMW. K. Melville
W. K. Melville
Conditions leading to the onset of air-flow separation over a mobile air-water interface are discussed. It is argued that, in a frame of reference in which the interfacial boundary assumes a steady shape, the occurrence of separation requires a stagnation point on the interface. In the case of air blowing over water waves, this corresponds to the onset of wave breaking. These arguments are strongly supported by flow visualization and pressure measurements carried out in a laboratory wind-wave flume. Furthermore, the pressure measurements show a greatly enhanced interfacial shear stress for a breaking wave compared with that over an unbroken wave of the same wavelength. The implications of these findings for wind-wave generation are discussed.

1 August 2006 in Journal of Physical Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMark A. Donelan
Mark A. Donelan
ABAlexander Babanin
Alexander Babanin
Ian YoungIan Young
Ian Young
MBMichael L. Banner
Michael L. Banner
Nearly all of the momentum transferred from wind to waves comes about through wave-induced pressure acting on the slopes of waves: known as form drag. Direct field measurements of the wave-induced pressure in airflow over water waves are difficult and consequently rare. Those that have been reported are for deep water conditions and conditions in which the level of forcing, measured by the ratio of wind speed to the speed of the dominant (spectral peak) waves, is quite weak, U10/cp < 3. The data reported here were obtained over a large shallow lake during the Australian Shallow Water Experiment (AUSWEX). The propagation speeds of the dominant waves were limited by depth and the waves were correspondingly steep. This wider range of forcing and concomitant wave steepness revealed some new aspects of the rate of wave amplification by wind, the so-called wind input source function, in the energy balance equation for wind-driven water waves. It was found that the exponential growth rate parameter (fractional energy increase per radian) depended on the slope of the waves, ak, vanishing as ak → 0. For very strong forcing a condition of “full separation” occurs, where the airflow detaches from the crests and reattaches on the windward face leaving a separation zone over the leeward face and the troughs. In a sense, the outer flow does not “see” the troughs and the resulting wave-induced pressure perturbation is much reduced, leading to a reduction in the wind input source function relative to that obtained by extrapolation from more benign conditions. The source function parameterized on wave steepness and degree of separation is shown to be in agreement with previous field and laboratory data obtained in conditions of much weaker forcing and wave steepness. The strongly forced steady-state conditions of AUSWEX have enabled the authors to define a generalized wind input source function that is suitable for a wide range of conditions.

28 August 1974 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. L. Banner
M. L. Banner
OPO. M. Phillips
O. M. Phillips
It is shown that the surface wind drift in the ocean substantially reduces the maximum wave height ξxand wave orbital velocity that can be attained before breaking. Ifqis the magnitude of the surface drift at the point where the wave profile crosses the mean water level andcis the wave speed, then\[ \zeta_{\max} = \frac{c^2}{2g}\bigg(1-\frac{q}{c}\bigg)^2. \]Incipient breaking in a steady wave train is characterized by the occurrence of stagnation points at wave crests, but not necessarily by discontinuities in slope. After breaking, there is in the mean flow a stagnation point relative to the wave profile near the crest of the broken wave, on one side of which the water tumbles forward and behind which it recedes more smoothly to the rear. Some simple flow visualization studies indicate the general extent of the wake behind the breaking region.

21 October 1974 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OPO. M. Phillips
O. M. Phillips
MBM. L. Banner
M. L. Banner
Wind, blowing over a water surface, induces a thin layer of high vorticity in which the wind stress is supported by molecular viscosity; the magnitude of the surface drift, the velocity difference across the layer, being of the order of 3% of the wind speed. When long waves move across the surface, there is a nonlinear augmentation of the surface drift near the long-wave crests, so that short waves, superimposed on the longer ones, experience an augmented drift in these regions. This is shown to reduce the maximum amplitude that the short waves can attain when they are at the point of incipient breaking.Theoretical estimates of the reduction are compared with measurements in wind-wave tanks by the authors and by Mitsuyasu (1966) in which long mechanically generated waves are superimposed on short wind-generated waves. The reductions measured in the energy density of the short waves by increasing the slope of the longer ones at constant wind speed are generally consistent with the predictions of the theory in a variety of cases.