Randy L. Diehl

Randy L. Diehl

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Randy L. Diehl

Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2004 in Annual Review of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDRandy L. Diehl
Randy L. Diehl
ALAndrew J. Lotto
Andrew J. Lotto
LHLori L. Holt
Lori L. Holt
This chapter focuses on one of the first steps in comprehending spoken language: How do listeners extract the most fundamental linguistic elements—consonants and vowels, or the distinctive features which compose them—from the acoustic signal? We begin by describing three major theoretical perspectives on the perception of speech. Then we review several lines of research that are relevant to distinguishing these perspectives. The research topics surveyed include categorical perception, phonetic context effects, learning of speech and related nonspeech categories, and the relation between speech perception and production. Finally, we describe challenges facing each of the major theoretical perspectives on speech perception.

1 January 2008 in Journal of Phonetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJohn Kingston
John Kingston
RDRandy L. Diehl
Randy L. Diehl
CKCecilia J. Kirk
Cecilia J. Kirk
WCWendy A. Castleman
Wendy A. Castleman

7 September 2007 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDRandy L Diehl
Randy L Diehl
Speech perception is remarkably robust. This paper examines how acoustic and auditory properties of vowels and consonants help to ensure intelligibility. First, the source–filter theory of speech production is briefly described, and the relationship between vocal-tract properties and formant patterns is demonstrated for some commonly occurring vowels. Next, two accounts of the structure of preferred sound inventories, quantal theory and dispersion theory, are described and some of their limitations are noted. Finally, it is suggested that certain aspects of quantal and dispersion theories can be unified in a principled way so as to achieve reasonable predictive accuracy.

14 September 1995
Verified
Book
Closed access
BCBruce Connell
Bruce Connell
AAAmalia Arvaniti
Amalia Arvaniti
JKJohn Kingston
John Kingston
RDRandy L. Diehl
Randy L. Diehl
TNTerrance M. Nearey
Terrance M. Nearey
CBCatherine P. Browman
Catherine P. Browman
The work published in Phonology and Phonetic Evidence presents an integrated phonetics-phonology approach in what has become an established field, laboratory phonology. This 1995 volume is divided into three sections. Part I deals with the status and role of features in phonological representations; Part II, on prosody, contains, amongst others, two papers which present for the first time detailed acoustic and perceptual evidence on the rhythm rule; and Part III, on articulatory organisation, includes several papers which from different perspectives test hypotheses derived from articulatory phonology, thereby testifying to the great influence this theory has exerted in recent years. This, the fourth in the series of Papers in Laboratory Phonology, will be welcomed by all those interested in phonetics, phonology and their interface.

1 April 2009 in Speech Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAdrian Garcia-Sierra
Adrian Garcia-Sierra
RDRandy L. Diehl
Randy L. Diehl
Craig ChamplinCraig Champlin
Craig Champlin

1 July 1996 in Perception & Psychophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RFRichard P. Fahey
Richard P. Fahey
RDRandy L. Diehl
Randy L. Diehl
Traunmüller (1981) suggested that the tonotopic distance between the first formant (F 1) and the fundamental frequency (F 0) is a major determinant of perceived vowel height. In the present study, subjects identified a vowel-height continuum ranging in formant pattern from /?/ to /ε/, at fiveF 0 values. IncreasingF 0 led to an increased probability of /I/ responses (i.e., the phoneme boundary shifted toward the /ε/ end of the continuum). Various conditions of filtering out the lower harmonics of the stimuli caused only marginal shifts of the phoneme boundary. The experiments provide evidence against interpretations of Traunmüller’s (1981) results that claim that vowel height is determined by the distance betweenF 1 and the lowest harmonic that is present in the basilar membrane excitation pattern.