Susan J. Chivers

Susan J. Chivers

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Susan J. Chivers

NOAA, NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Marine Mammal and Turtle Division 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla California 92037 U.S.A.

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 February 2016 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElizabeth Becker
Elizabeth Becker
KFKarin A. Forney
Karin A. Forney
PFPaul C. Fiedler
Paul C. Fiedler
JBJay Barlow
Jay Barlow
SCSusan J. Chivers
Susan J. Chivers
JRJessica V. Redfern
Jessica V. Redfern
Species distribution models are now widely used in conservation and management to predict suitable habitat for protected marine species. The primary sources of dynamic habitat data have been in situ and remotely sensed oceanic variables (both are considered “measured data”), but now ocean models can provide historical estimates and forecast predictions of relevant habitat variables such as temperature, salinity, and mixed layer depth. To assess the performance of modeled ocean data in species distribution models, we present a case study for cetaceans that compares models based on output from a data assimilative implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) to those based on measured data. Specifically, we used seven years of cetacean line-transect survey data collected between 1991 and 2009 to develop predictive habitat-based models of cetacean density for 11 species in the California Current Ecosystem. Two different generalized additive models were compared: one built with a full suite of ROMS output and another built with a full suite of measured data. Model performance was assessed using the percentage of explained deviance, root mean squared error (RMSE), observed to predicted density ratios, and visual inspection of predicted and observed distributions. Predicted distribution patterns were similar for models using ROMS output and measured data, and showed good concordance between observed sightings and model predictions. Quantitative measures of predictive ability were also similar between model types, and RMSE values were almost identical. The overall demonstrated success of the ROMS-based models opens new opportunities for dynamic species management and biodiversity monitoring because ROMS output is available in near real time and can be forecast.

1 October 2005 in Marine Mammal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCS. J. Chivers
S. J. Chivers
RLR. G. Leduc
R. G. Leduc
KRK. M. Robertson
K. M. Robertson
NBN. B. Barros
N. B. Barros
ADA. E. Dizon
A. E. Dizon

1 January 2002 in J. Cetacean Res. Manage.
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCS. J. Chivers
S. J. Chivers
ADA. E. Dizon
A. E. Dizon
PGP. J. Gearin
P. J. Gearin
KRK. M. Robertson
K. M. Robertson
Concern about the conservation and management of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) populations, which have experienced relatively large incidental fishery kills in localised areas throughout their range, has prompted research to better understand their population structure. Both mitochondrial and nuclear (microsatellites) DNA were used to examine the intra-specific structure of harbour porpoise inhabiting the eastern North Pacific Ocean. Null hypotheses of panmixia were tested after mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequence data (402 base pairs; n = 249) and allele frequency data (9 polymorphic loci; n = 194) were sub-divided into geographic strata defined a priori. Strata were based on sampling discontinuities and not discontinuities in population distribution. The mtDNA and nuclear gene data revealed statistically significant genetic differentiation between most strata (a = 0.05) suggesting demographic independence of fairly small sub-units within the population. Since harbour porpoises are essentially continuously distributed in the eastern North Pacific, this degree of genetic differentiation was unexpected and needs to be considered in developing a sound management plan to protect them.

26 June 2015 in Marine Mammal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSusan J. Chivers
Susan J. Chivers
WPWayne L. Perryman
Wayne L. Perryman
MLMorgan S. Lynn
Morgan S. Lynn
TGTim Gerrodette
Tim Gerrodette
FAFrederick I. Archer
Frederick I. Archer
JDJames P. Dines
James P. Dines

15 July 2018 in Aquatic Mammals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan J. Chivers
Susan J. Chivers
WPWayne L. Perryman
Wayne L. Perryman
MLMorgan S. Lynn
Morgan S. Lynn
KWKristi West
Kristi West
JBJr. Robert L. Brownell
Jr. Robert L. Brownell

27 October 2018 in Marine Mammal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSusan J. Chivers
Susan J. Chivers
WPWayne L. Perryman
Wayne L. Perryman
MLMorgan S. Lynn
Morgan S. Lynn