Kevin D. Glazebrook

Kevin D. Glazebrook

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Kevin D. Glazebrook

Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 February 2011
Verified
Book
Open access
JGJohn Gittins
John Gittins
KGKevin Glazebrook
Kevin Glazebrook
RWRichard Weber
Richard Weber
Click on the title to browse this book

1 April 2003 in Mathematical Methods of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAP. S. Ansell
P. S. Ansell
KGK. D. Glazebrook
K. D. Glazebrook
José Niño-MoraJosé Niño-Mora
José Niño-Mora
MOM. O'keeffe
M. O'keeffe

1 August 2005 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGK.D. Glazebrook
K.D. Glazebrook
HMH.M. Mitchell
H.M. Mitchell
PAP.S. Ansell
P.S. Ansell

1 January 2020 in Transportation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JFJamie Fairbrother
Jamie Fairbrother
KZKonstantinos G. Zografos
Konstantinos G. Zografos
KGKevin D. Glazebrook
Kevin D. Glazebrook
Congestion is a problem at airports where capacity does not meet demand. At many such airports, airlines must request time slots for the purpose of landing or take off. Given the imbalance between demand and capacity, slot requests cannot always be scheduled as requested. The difference between the requested and allocated time slots is called displacement. Minimization of the total displacement is a key slot-scheduling objective and expresses the efficiency of the slot-scheduling process. Additionally, fairness has been proposed as a slot-scheduling criterion. Fairness relates to the allocation of the total schedule displacement among the various airlines. Single- and multiobjective models have been proposed for slot scheduling. However, currently the literature lacks models that incorporate the preferences of airlines regarding the allocation of displacement to their flights. This paper proposes a two-stage mechanism for the scheduling of slots at congested airports. The proposed mechanism considers efficiency and fairness objectives and incorporates the preferences of airlines in allocating the total displacement associated with the flights of each airline. The first stage of the mechanism constructs a reference schedule that is fair to the participating airlines. In the second stage, the airlines specify how the displacement allocated to them in the reference schedule should be distributed among their requests. The mechanism then adjusts the fair reference schedule to meet as many of these preferences as possible. The development and implementation of the proposed slot-scheduling mechanism is demonstrated using real data from a coordinated airport and simulated displacement preference data. The proposed slot-scheduling mechanism provides useful information to decision makers regarding the equity–efficiency trade-off and enhances the transparency and acceptability of the slot-scheduling outcome.

1 August 2009 in Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGK. D. Glazebrook
K. D. Glazebrook
CKC. Kirkbride
C. Kirkbride
JOJ. Ouenniche
J. Ouenniche
We propose a general Markovian model for the optimal control of admissions and subsequent routing of customers for service provided by a collection of heterogeneous stations. Queue-length information is available to inform all decisions. Admitted customers will abandon the system if required to wait too long for service. The optimisation goal is the maximisation of reward rate earned from service completions, net of the penalties paid whenever admission is denied, and the costs incurred upon every customer loss through impatience. We show that the system is indexable under mild conditions on model parameters and give an explicit construction of an index policy for admission control and routing founded on a proposal of Whittle for restless bandits. We are able to gain insights regarding the strength of performance of the index policy from the nature of solutions to the Lagrangian relaxation used to develop the indices. These insights are strengthened by the development of performance bounds. Although we are able to assert the optimality of the index heuristic in a range of asymptotic regimes, the performance bounds are also able to identify instances where its performance is relatively weak. Numerical studies are used to illustrate and support the theoretical analyses.

1 September 2012 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPColin Paterson
Colin Paterson
RTRuud Teunter
Ruud Teunter
KGKevin Glazebrook
Kevin Glazebrook