Gaius R. Shaver

Gaius R. Shaver

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gaius R. Shaver

The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2001 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. Syndonia Bret-Harte
M. Syndonia Bret-Harte
GSGaius R. Shaver
Gaius R. Shaver
JZJennifer P. Zoerner
Jennifer P. Zoerner
JJJill F. Johnstone
Jill F. Johnstone
JWJoanna L. Wagner
Joanna L. Wagner
JLJames A. Laundre
James A. Laundre

16 June 2007 in Journal of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSG. R. Shaver
G. R. Shaver
LSL. E. Street
L. E. Street
ERE. B. Rastetter
E. B. Rastetter
MWM. T. VAN Wijk
M. T. VAN Wijk
MWMathew Williams
Mathew Williams
Summary: Arctic landscapes are characterized by extreme vegetation patchiness, often with sharply defined borders between very different vegetation types. This patchiness makes it difficult to predict landscape‐level C balance and its change in response to environment. Here we develop a model of net CO2 flux by arctic landscapes that is independent of vegetation composition, using instead a measure of leaf area derived from NDVI (normalized‐difference vegetation index). Using the light response of CO2 flux (net ecosystem exchange, NEE) measured in a wide range of vegetation in arctic Alaska and Sweden, we exercise the model using various data subsets for parameter estimation and tests of predictions. Overall, the model consistently explains ~80% of the variance in NEE knowing only the estimated leaf area index (LAI), photosynthetically active photon flux density (PPFD) and air temperature. Model parameters derived from measurements made in one site or vegetation type can be used to predict NEE in other sites or vegetation types with acceptable accuracy and precision. Further improvements in model prediction may come from incorporating an estimate of moss area in addition to LAI, and from using vegetation‐specific estimates of LAI. The success of this model at predicting NEE independent of any information on species composition indicates a high level of convergence in canopy structure and function in the arctic landscape.

1 February 1998 in Ecological Monographs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSG. R. Shaver
G. R. Shaver
LJL. C. Johnson
L. C. Johnson
DCD. H. Cades
D. H. Cades
GMG. Murray
G. Murray
JLJ. A. Laundre
J. A. Laundre
AGA. E. Giblin
A. E. Giblin
The aim of this research was to analyze the effects of increased N or P availability, increased air temperature, and decreased light intensity on wet sedge tundra in northern Alaska. Nutrient availab...

23 January 2017 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJohn E. Hobbie
John E. Hobbie
GSGaius R. Shaver
Gaius R. Shaver
EREdward B. Rastetter
Edward B. Rastetter
JCJessica E. Cherry
Jessica E. Cherry
SGScott Goetz
Scott Goetz
GKGeorge Kling
George Kling
Long-term measurements of ecological effects of warming are often not statistically significant because of annual variability or signal noise. These are reduced in indicators that filter or reduce the noise around the signal and allow effects of climate warming to emerge. In this way, certain indicators act as medium pass filters integrating the signal over years-to-decades. In the Alaskan Arctic, the 25-year record of warming of air temperature revealed no significant trend, yet environmental and ecological changes prove that warming is affecting the ecosystem. The useful indicators are deep permafrost temperatures, vegetation and shrub biomass, satellite measures of canopy reflectance (NDVI), and chemical measures of soil weathering. In contrast, the 18-year record in the Greenland Arctic revealed an extremely high summer air-warming of 1.3 °C/decade; the cover of some plant species increased while the cover of others decreased. Useful indicators of change are NDVI and the active layer thickness.

1 August 1996 in Arctic and Alpine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSG. R. Shaver
G. R. Shaver
JLJ. A. Laundre
J. A. Laundre
AGA. E. Giblin
A. E. Giblin
KNKnute Nadelhoffer
Knute Nadelhoffer
In the arctic landscape, vegetation composition and structure are strongly affected by topographic position and associated variation in microclimate. Along a si...

19 August 2013 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSG. R. Shaver
G. R. Shaver
ERE. B. Rastetter
E. B. Rastetter
VSV. Salmon
V. Salmon
LSL. E. Street
L. E. Street
MWM. J. van de Weg
M. J. van de Weg
MWMathew Williams
Mathew Williams
Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of C varies greatly among Arctic ecosystems. Here, we show that approximately 75 per cent of this variation can be accounted for in a single regression model that predicts NEE as a function of leaf area index (LAI), air temperature and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The model was developed in concert with a survey of the light response of NEE in Arctic and subarctic tundras in Alaska, Greenland, Svalbard and Sweden. Model parametrizations based on data collected in one part of the Arctic can be used to predict NEE in other parts of the Arctic with accuracy similar to that of predictions based on data collected in the same site where NEE is predicted. The principal requirement for the dataset is that it should contain a sufficiently wide range of measurements of NEE at both high and low values of LAI, air temperature and PAR, to properly constrain the estimates of model parameters. Canopy N content can also be substituted for leaf area in predicting NEE, with equal or greater accuracy, but substitution of soil temperature for air temperature does not improve predictions. Overall, the results suggest a remarkable convergence in regulation of NEE in diverse ecosystem types throughout the Arctic.