Shelby Sutton Fields

Shelby Sutton Fields

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Shelby Sutton Fields

US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2023 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKyle P. Kelley
Kyle P. Kelley
AMAnna N. Morozovska
Anna N. Morozovska
EEEugene A. Eliseev
Eugene A. Eliseev
YLYongtao Liu
Yongtao Liu
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
SKSergei Kalinin
Sergei Kalinin

3 August 2022 in Advanced Electronic Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
TCTruong Cai
Truong Cai
SJSamantha T. Jaszewski
Samantha T. Jaszewski
ASAlejandro Salanova
Alejandro Salanova
TMTakanori Mimura
Takanori Mimura
JIJon F. Ihlefeld
Jon F. Ihlefeld
The presence of the top electrode on hafnium oxide‐based thin films during processing has been shown to drive an increase in the amount of metastable ferroelectric orthorhombic phase and polarization performance. This “Clamping Effect,” also referred to as the Capping or Confinement Effect, is attributed to the mechanical stress and confinement from the top electrode layer. However, other contributions to orthorhombic phase stabilization have been experimentally reported, which may also be affected by the presence of a top electrode. In this study, it is shown that the presence of the top electrode during thermal processing results in larger tensile biaxial stress magnitudes and concomitant increases in ferroelectric phase fraction and polarization response, whereas film chemistry, microstructure, and crystallization temperature are not affected. Through etching experiments and measurement of stress evolution for each processing step, it is shown that the top electrode locally inhibits out‐of‐plane expansion in the HZO during crystallization, which prevents equilibrium monoclinic phase formation and stabilizes the orthorhombic phase. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of the clamping effect and orthorhombic phase formation in ferroelectric hafnium oxide‐based thin films, which informs the future design of these materials to maximize ferroelectric phase purity and corresponding polarization behavior.

12 December 2022 in Applied Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JIJon F. Ihlefeld
Jon F. Ihlefeld
SJSamantha T. Jaszewski
Samantha T. Jaszewski
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
Ferroelectric hafnium oxides are poised to impact a wide range of microelectronic applications owing to their superior thickness scaling of ferroelectric stability and compatibility with mainstream semiconductors and fabrication processes. For broad-scale impact, long-term performance and reliability of devices using hafnia will require knowledge of the phases present and how they vary with time and use. In this Perspective article, the importance of phases present on device performance is discussed, including the extent to which specific classes of devices can tolerate phase impurities. Following, the factors and mechanisms that are known to influence phase stability, including substituents, crystallite size, oxygen point defects, electrode chemistry, biaxial stress, and electrode capping layers, are highlighted. Discussions will focus on the importance of considering both neutral and charged oxygen vacancies as stabilizing agents, the limited biaxial strain imparted to a hafnia layer by adjacent electrodes, and the strong correlation of biaxial stress with resulting polarization response. Areas needing additional research, such as the necessity for a more quantitative means to distinguish the metastable tetragonal and orthorhombic phases, quantification of oxygen vacancies, and calculation of band structures, including defect energy levels for pure hafnia and stabilized with substituents, are emphasized.

8 March 2021 in Applied Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
DODavid H. Olson
David H. Olson
SJSamantha T. Jaszewski
Samantha T. Jaszewski
Chris M. FancherChris M. Fancher
Chris M. Fancher
SSSean W. Smith
Sean W. Smith
JIJon F. Ihlefeld
Jon F. Ihlefeld
The elastic moduli of amorphous and crystalline atomic layer-deposited Hf1-xZrxO2 (HZO, x = 0, 0.31, 0.46, 0.79, 1) films prepared with TaN electrodes on silicon substrates were investigated using picosecond acoustic measurements. The moduli of the amorphous films were observed to increase between 211 ± 6 GPa for pure HfO2 and 302 ± 9 GPa for pure ZrO2. In the crystalline films, it was found that the moduli increased upon increasing the zirconium composition from 248 ± 6 GPa for monoclinic HfO2 to 267 ± 9 GPa for tetragonal ZrO2. Positive deviations from this increase were observed for the Hf0.69Zr0.31O2 and Hf0.54Zr0.46O2 compositions, which were measured to have moduli of 264 ± 8 GPa and 274 ± 8 GPa, respectively. These two compositions contained the largest fractions of the ferroelectric orthorhombic phase, as assessed from polarization and diffraction data. The biaxial stress states of the crystalline films were characterized through sin2( ψ ) x-ray diffraction analysis. The in-plane stresses were all found to be tensile and observed to increase with the increasing zirconium composition, between 2.54 ± 0.6 GPa for pure HfO2 and 5.22 ± 0.5 GPa for pure ZrO2. The stresses are consistent with large thermal expansion mismatches between the HZO films and silicon substrates. These results demonstrate a device-scale means to quantify biaxial stress for investigation on its effect on the ferroelectric properties of hafnia-based materials.

4 October 2021 in Journal of Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
SSSean W. Smith
Sean W. Smith
SJSamantha T. Jaszewski
Samantha T. Jaszewski
TMTakanori Mimura
Takanori Mimura
DDDiane Dickie
Diane Dickie
JIJon F. Ihlefeld
Jon F. Ihlefeld
The mechanisms leading to wake-up and fatigue in ferroelectric hafnium zirconium oxide thin film devices with symmetric RuO2 electrodes are investigated via polarization, relative permittivity, dielectric nonlinearity, pyroelectric coefficient, and microfocus x-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. The devices are observed to wake-up for up to 103 bipolar pulsed field cycles, after which fatigue occurs with polarization approaching zero following 108 cycles. Wake-up is accompanied by a decrease in both high-field permittivity and hysteresis loop pinching and an increase in the pyroelectric coefficient, indicating that the wake-up process involves a combination of transformations from the tetragonal to the orthorhombic phase and domain depinning from defect redistribution. Fatigue is observed to coincide with an increase in irreversible domain wall motion and a decrease in pyroelectric coefficient. Finite pyroelectric coefficients are measured on fully fatigued devices, indicating that domain pinning is a strong contributor to fatigue and that fatigued devices contain domain structures that are unable to switch under the fields applied for measurement. Microfocus XRD patterns measured on each device reveal that the phase constitution is qualitatively unaffected by field cycling and resultant polarization fatigue. These data indicate that the wake-up process has contributions from both phase transformations and domain depinning, whereas the fatigue process is driven primarily by domain pinning, and the near-zero measured switchable polarization is actually a poled device with immobile domains. These observations provide insight into the physical changes occurring during field cycling of HfO2-based ferroelectrics while examining a possible oxide electrode material for silicon CMOS device implementation.

23 March 2021 in Advanced Materials Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFShelby S. Fields
Shelby S. Fields
SSSean W. Smith
Sean W. Smith
Chris M. FancherChris M. Fancher
Chris M. Fancher
MHMichael David Henry
Michael David Henry
SWSteve L. Wolfley
Steve L. Wolfley
JIJon F. Ihlefeld
Jon F. Ihlefeld